CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsSkoda Scala vs Mazda Mazda3
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Skoda Scala vs Mazda Mazda3

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular Hatchbacks compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecSkodaMazda
Price (RRP)$30,900$26,490
Fuel typePetrolPetrol
Power85kW114kW
0-100 km/h10.1s9.7s
Fuel Economy5.4 L/100km5.9 L/100km
Boot Space467L295L
Towing1,200kg1,200kg
Warranty7yr / Unlimited5yr / Unlimited
ANCAP SafetyNo dataNo data

Track the Skoda Scala & Mazda Mazda3

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

The Skoda Scala starts from $30,900 before on-road costs, while the Mazda Mazda3 opens at $26,490. That makes the Mazda Mazda3 the more affordable entry point by $4,410.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $33,990 and $29,139 respectively.

Over 5 years, the running costs are nearly identical since both have similar efficiency.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Feature Showdown

The Skoda Scala features a 8.3-inch touchscreen paired with a 8-inch digital dash, while the Mazda Mazda3 gets a 8.8-inch display and 7-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The Skoda Scala stands out with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto that you will not find on the Mazda Mazda3. The Mazda Mazda3 counters with Apple CarPlay. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Drivetrain

The Skoda Scala uses a Petrol producing 85kW and 200Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a FWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 10.1 seconds.

The Mazda Mazda3 responds with a Petrol making 114kW and 200Nm, paired to a automatic driving the front wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 9.7 seconds.

The Mazda Mazda3 has the clear power advantage at 114kW vs 85kW. In the real-world sprint, the Mazda Mazda3 is 0.4s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Skoda Scala measures 4,362mm long on a 2,649mm wheelbase, 98mm shorter than the Mazda Mazda3 at 4,460mm (2,725mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Mazda Mazda3 generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 467L in the Skoda Scala and 295L in the Mazda Mazda3, giving the Skoda Scala a 172L advantage.

For towing, the Mazda Mazda3 leads with a 1,200kg braked capacity vs 1,200kg. That 0kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

10.2m to 10.6m

Skoda Scala 85TSI Select
10.2mTighter
Best
Mazda Mazda3 G20 Pure
10.6m
Worst
Skoda Scala 85TSI Select
10.2m · Good

Based on 10.2m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Mazda3 G20 Pure
10.6m · Good

Based on 10.6m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $1,539/year for the Skoda Scala and $1,682/year for the Mazda Mazda3. That is a $143 annual difference in favour of the Skoda Scala.

Estimated annual total: $1,539 (Skoda Scala) vs $1,682 (Mazda Mazda3). The Skoda Scala saves you roughly $143 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 7 years / 999,999km (Skoda Scala) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Mazda Mazda3). The Skoda Scala has longer coverage.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Skoda Scala if: You need more boot space, want lower running costs, value a longer warranty, or prefer Skoda's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Mazda Mazda3 if: You want the lower entry price, prioritise performance, or prefer Mazda's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

This is genuinely close. The Skoda Scala and Mazda Mazda3 trade blows across the spec sheet, and neither runs away with an outright win. The Skoda Scala will save you roughly $143 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Skoda Scala has a clear edge. The Skoda Scala adds peace of mind with a longer 7-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Skoda Scala and Mazda Mazda3?

The Mazda Mazda3 is the cheapest at $26,490 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Skoda Scala by $4,410.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Skoda Scala uses the least fuel at 5.4L/100km on the combined cycle.

What are the ANCAP safety ratings?

None of Skoda Scala and Mazda Mazda3 carry a published ANCAP rating yet — check back as they are tested.

Which has the most boot space?

The Skoda Scala has the largest boot at 467L.

Which can tow the most?

The Skoda Scala has the highest braked towing capacity at 1,200kg.

Which has the best warranty?

The Skoda Scala has the longest warranty at 7 years / Unlimited.

Which is the most powerful?

The Mazda Mazda3 makes the most power at 114kW. The Mazda Mazda3 is quickest to 100km/h in 9.7s.

Free: Chinese Cars in Australia Cheat Sheet

Sign up free and we'll email you our Chinese Cars Cheat Sheet (PDF) — all 22 brands ranked on service, parts, warranty and dealer experience. Plus new-car launches, reviews and founding-member pricing on the upcoming CarSorted Pro Report. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.

By subscribing, you agree to receive marketing emails. You can unsubscribe at any time. View our Privacy Policy.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All Hatchbacks · Best family cars