CS
CarSorted
Home›Comparisons›Subaru Forester vs Mazda CX-5
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Subaru Forester vs Mazda CX-5

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

Data checked: specs 29 Aug 2026, price 7 Oct 2026

Winner
Subaru Forester
Subaru

Subaru Forester

13 of 27 standard · no option data · 14 no data

From $45,990

Body

SUV

Fuel type

Petrol

Engine

Petrol

Power

136kW

Economy

7.9 L/100km

Safety

5★ ANCAP

Boot (seats up)

496L

76CarSorted Score / 100

Top CarSorted Score, 76 vs 75, but the Mazda CX-5 is $6,000 cheaper

Mazda CX-5
Mazda

Mazda CX-5

16 of 27 standard · no option data · 11 no data

From $39,990

Body

SUV

Fuel type

Petrol

Engine

Petrol

Power

132kW

Economy

7.4 L/100km

Safety

5★ ANCAP

Boot (seats up)

466L

75CarSorted Score / 100

Driver assistance, as the maker lists it

Swipe across. Tap a feature to see what it does and each car's source.

StandardOptional: printed price, +pack or NCO (no-cost)No, not offeredNo dataCounts beside each car use the same colours; ? is no option data.

Car
Subaru ForesterAWD6?06
Mazda CX-5G25 Pure AWD8?04

From each manufacturer's Australian equipment list. No data means that car's document does not say. The drawings are our own illustrations of how each kind of system works.

SpecSubaruMazda
Price (RRP)$45,990$39,990
Equipped to matchEach car with the other's standard kit

$45,990RRP

  • no option data for this car

$39,990RRP

  • no option data for this car

Printed option prices only. A pack is counted once and makes the figure a floor when it carries no printed price. Nothing is inferred from the other car.

Fuel typePetrolPetrol
Power136kW132kW
0-100 km/h—8.7s
Fuel Economy7.9 L/100km7.4 L/100km
Boot (seats up)496L466L
Towing1,800kg1,800kg
Warranty5yr / Unlimited5yr / Unlimited
ANCAP Safety5 Stars5 Stars

Track the Subaru Forester & Mazda CX-5

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

The Subaru Forester starts from $45,990 before on-road costs, while the Mazda CX-5 opens at $39,990. That makes the Mazda CX-5 the more affordable entry point by $6,000.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $50,589 and $43,989 respectively.

Over 5 years, the running costs are nearly identical since both have similar efficiency.

Safety Rundown

Both the Subaru Forester and Mazda CX-5 hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating. Adult occupant protection scored 83% for the Subaru Forester and 90% for the Mazda CX-5.

Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. We can confirm 5 of 10 key ADAS systems on the Mazda CX-5, against 4 on the Subaru Forester.

Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, lane keep assist, adaptive cruise control, a reversing camera.

Recalls on our record

Subaru Forester

  • REC-005831 · published 20 Nov 2023The front drive shaft may not meet manufacturing specifications and the outer race of the front driveshaft may crack.Year range on the notice: 2023
  • REC-001604 · published 2 Jun 2021The rear stabiliser bracket bolts may not have been sufficiently tightened during production.Year range on the notice: 2017 - 2020
  • REC-001224 · published 3 Dec 2019Over time the aluminium positive crankcase ventilation (PCV) valve may fracture, allowing the engine to draw an increased amount of engine oil.Year range on the notice: 2018 - 2019
  • 8 more on the model page.

Mazda CX-5

  • REC-005009 · published 2 Dec 2021The low pressure fuel pump impeller may become deformed and cause the fuel pump to stop working.Year range on the notice: 2017 - 2019
  • REC-000898 · published 19 Mar 2020The daytime running lights (DRL) may flicker or fail to illuminate while driving.Year range on the notice: 2015 - 2016
  • REC-000894 · published 10 Oct 2019The affected vehicles may accumulate carbon deposits in the intake shutter valve, in addition to premature wear of certain engine components.Year range on the notice: 2012 - 2018
  • 2 more on the model page.

A recall covers the builds its notice lists, not every car of a model. Check your VIN at vehiclerecalls.gov.au.

Feature Showdown

The Subaru Forester features a 11.6-inch touchscreen paired with a 4.2-inch digital dash, while the Mazda CX-5 gets a 12.9-inch display and 10.3-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The Subaru Forester stands out with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto — features our data doesn't list for the Mazda CX-5. The Mazda CX-5 counters with Apple CarPlay. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Drivetrain

The Subaru Forester uses a Petrol producing 136kW and 247Nm of torque, sent through a cvt to a AWD layout.

The Mazda CX-5 responds with a Petrol making 132kW and 242Nm, paired to a automatic driving all four wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 8.7 seconds.

The Subaru Forester has the clear power advantage at 136kW vs 132kW. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Subaru Forester measures 4,655mm long on a 2,670mm wheelbase, 35mm shorter than the Mazda CX-5 at 4,690mm (2,815mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Mazda CX-5 generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 496L in the Subaru Forester and 466L in the Mazda CX-5, giving the Subaru Forester a 30L advantage. Fold the rears and you get 1174L vs 1594L.

For towing, the Mazda CX-5 leads with a 1,800kg braked capacity vs 1,800kg. That 0kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

10.8m to 11.2m

TightestSubaru Forester AWDTightest turn at 10.8m, easiest U-turns and carparks
Subaru Forester AWD
10.8mTighter
Best
Mazda CX-5 G25 Pure AWD
11.2m
Worst
Subaru Forester AWD
10.8m · Good

Based on 10.8m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Mazda CX-5 G25 Pure AWD
11.2m · Average

Based on 11.2m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Compare U-turns side by side

Turning Circle · U-turn compare

kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars
Tap to add/remove
TightestSubaru ForesterTightest turn at 10.8m, needs the least road to swing around
Subaru ForesterTightest10.8 m
Good△ 3-point
Mazda CX-511.2 m
Average△ 3-point
Scrub the turn

0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep

Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $2,252/year for the Subaru Forester and $2,109/year for the Mazda CX-5. That is a $143 annual difference in favour of the Mazda CX-5.

Warranty: 5 years / 999,999km (Subaru Forester) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Mazda CX-5). Both match on warranty length.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Subaru Forester if: You prioritise performance, need more boot space, or prefer Subaru's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Mazda CX-5 if: You want the lower entry price, want lower running costs, or prefer Mazda's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

Subaru Forester: Top CarSorted Score, 76 vs 75, but the Mazda CX-5 is $6,000 cheaper

The Subaru Forester comes out ahead on the CarSorted Score (76 vs 75), taking 2 of 4 key spec rows below. The deciding gaps: safety (Subaru Forester ahead by 10), fuel economy (Mazda CX-5 ahead by 4), value (Mazda CX-5 ahead by 3). The Mazda CX-5 will save you roughly $143 a year in fuel. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

One enquiry, local dealers' best price on each. Free for you to use. If you buy, the dealer may pay us a commission.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Subaru Forester and Mazda CX-5?

The Mazda CX-5 is the cheapest at $39,990 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Subaru Forester by $6,000.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Mazda CX-5 uses the least fuel at 7.4L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched on crash rating: Subaru Forester and Mazda CX-5 all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which has the most boot space?

The Subaru Forester has the largest boot at 496L with the seats up (1,174L with the seats folded).

Which can tow the most?

The Subaru Forester has the highest braked towing capacity at 1,800kg.

Which is the most powerful?

The Subaru Forester makes the most power at 136kW.

Free newsletter

Stay across the market

Get our weekly new-car rundown of launches, price moves, deals and reviews, straight from the data.

  • Weekly new-car rundown
  • Price cuts and new deals
  • New launches and reviews

No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs · Best mid-size SUVs