CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsSuzuki e Vitara vs Mitsubishi ASX
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Suzuki e Vitara vs Mitsubishi ASX

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecSuzukiMitsubishi
Price (RRP)$36,990$37,740
Range (WLTP)344km
Battery49 kWh
Power128kW113kW
0-100 km/h9s11.9s
Max DC Charge129kW
10-80% Charge Time17 min
Fuel Economy15 kWh/100km6.4 L/100km
Boot Space306L350L
Towing750kg1,200kg
Warranty5yr / 999.999k km10yr / 200k km
ANCAP Safety5 Stars5 Stars

Price Breakdown

The Suzuki e Vitara starts from $36,990 before on-road costs, while the Mitsubishi ASX opens at $37,740. That makes the Suzuki e Vitara the more affordable entry point by $750.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $40,689 and $41,514 respectively.

The Suzuki e Vitara qualifies for FBT exemption as an electric vehicle, which can dramatically reduce the effective cost for novated lease buyers. The Mitsubishi ASX, as a petrol model, does not qualify.

Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Suzuki e Vitara by roughly $5,520 in fuel alone.

Safety Rundown

Both the Suzuki e Vitara and Mitsubishi ASX hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating. Adult occupant protection scored 77% for the Suzuki e Vitara and 76% for the Mitsubishi ASX.

Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. The Mitsubishi ASX packs more ADAS features with 5 out of 10 key systems fitted, compared to 0 in the Suzuki e Vitara.

Both include the essentials: a reversing camera.

Feature Showdown

Both come with modern infotainment systems. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

Drivetrain

The Suzuki e Vitara uses a Electric Motor producing 128kW and 189Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a FWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 9 seconds.

The Mitsubishi ASX responds with a Petrol making 113kW and 270Nm, paired to a automatic driving the front wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 11.9 seconds.

The Suzuki e Vitara has the clear power advantage at 128kW vs 113kW. In the real-world sprint, the Suzuki e Vitara is 2.9s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Suzuki e Vitara measures 4,275mm long on a 2,700mm wheelbase, 5mm longer than the Mitsubishi ASX at 4,270mm (2,634mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Suzuki e Vitara generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 306L in the Suzuki e Vitara and 350L in the Mitsubishi ASX, giving the Mitsubishi ASX a 44L advantage.

For towing, the Mitsubishi ASX leads with a 1,200kg braked capacity vs 750kg. That 450kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

10.4m to 10.4m

Suzuki e Vitara Motion FWD
10.4mTighter
Best
Mitsubishi ASX LS
10.4m
Best
Suzuki e Vitara
10.4m · Good

Based on 10.4m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Mitsubishi ASX
10.4m · Good

Based on 10.4m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $720/year for the Suzuki e Vitara and $1,824/year for the Mitsubishi ASX. That is a $1,104 annual difference in favour of the Suzuki e Vitara.

Estimated annual total: $720 (Suzuki e Vitara) vs $1,824 (Mitsubishi ASX). The Suzuki e Vitara saves you roughly $1,104 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 5 years / 999,999km (Suzuki e Vitara) vs 10 years / 200,000km (Mitsubishi ASX). The Mitsubishi ASX has longer coverage.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Suzuki e Vitara if: You want the lower entry price, prioritise performance, want lower running costs, or prefer Suzuki's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Mitsubishi ASX if: You need more boot space, value a longer warranty, need stronger towing, or prefer Mitsubishi's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Mitsubishi ASX takes 4 of 7 key spec categories. The Suzuki e Vitara will save you roughly $1,104 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Mitsubishi ASX has a clear edge. The Mitsubishi ASX adds peace of mind with a longer 10-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Suzuki e Vitara and Mitsubishi ASX?

The Suzuki e Vitara is the cheapest at $36,990 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Mitsubishi ASX by $750.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Mitsubishi ASX uses the least fuel at 6.4L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched — Suzuki e Vitara and Mitsubishi ASX all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which has the most boot space?

The Mitsubishi ASX has the largest boot at 350L.

Which can tow the most?

The Mitsubishi ASX has the highest braked towing capacity at 1,200kg.

Which has the best warranty?

The Mitsubishi ASX has the longest warranty at 10 years / 200k km.

Which is the most powerful?

The Suzuki e Vitara makes the most power at 128kW. The Suzuki e Vitara is quickest to 100km/h in 9s.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs