CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsSuzuki Ignis vs Mazda CX-3
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Suzuki Ignis vs Mazda CX-3

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecSuzukiMazda
Price (RRP)$22,490$27,800
Power61kW110kW
0-100 km/h12.8s10.9s
Fuel Economy4.9 L/100km6 L/100km
Boot Space260L350L
Towing1,000kg
Warranty3yr / 100k km5yr / 999.999k km
ANCAP Safety5 Stars5 Stars

Price Breakdown

The Suzuki Ignis starts from $22,490 before on-road costs, while the Mazda CX-3 opens at $27,800. That makes the Suzuki Ignis the more affordable entry point by $5,310.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $24,739 and $30,580 respectively.

Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Suzuki Ignis by roughly $1,565 in fuel alone.

Safety Rundown

Both the Suzuki Ignis and Mazda CX-3 hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating.

Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. Both models are evenly matched with 1 out of 10 key ADAS systems.

Both include the essentials: a reversing camera.

Feature Showdown

Both come with modern infotainment systems. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

Drivetrain

The Suzuki Ignis uses a Petrol producing 61kW and 113Nm of torque, sent through a cvt to a FWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 12.8 seconds.

The Mazda CX-3 responds with a Petrol making 110kW and 195Nm, paired to a automatic driving the front wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 10.9 seconds.

The Mazda CX-3 has the clear power advantage at 110kW vs 61kW. In the real-world sprint, the Mazda CX-3 is 1.9s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Suzuki Ignis measures 3,700mm long on a 2,435mm wheelbase, 575mm shorter than the Mazda CX-3 at 4,275mm (2,570mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Mazda CX-3 generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 260L in the Suzuki Ignis and 350L in the Mazda CX-3, giving the Mazda CX-3 a 90L advantage.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

10.6m diameter

Good

Mazda CX-3 G20 Pure
10.6m
Mazda CX-3
10.6m · Good

Based on 10.6m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $1,397/year for the Suzuki Ignis and $1,710/year for the Mazda CX-3. That is a $313 annual difference in favour of the Suzuki Ignis.

Estimated annual total: $1,397 (Suzuki Ignis) vs $1,710 (Mazda CX-3). The Suzuki Ignis saves you roughly $313 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 3 years / 100,000km (Suzuki Ignis) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Mazda CX-3). The Mazda CX-3 has longer coverage.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Suzuki Ignis if: You want the lower entry price, want lower running costs, or prefer Suzuki's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Mazda CX-3 if: You prioritise performance, need more boot space, value a longer warranty, or prefer Mazda's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Mazda CX-3 takes 4 of 6 key spec categories. The Suzuki Ignis will save you roughly $313 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Mazda CX-3 has a clear edge. The Mazda CX-3 adds peace of mind with a longer 5-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Suzuki Ignis and Mazda CX-3?

The Suzuki Ignis is the cheapest at $22,490 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Mazda CX-3 by $5,310.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Suzuki Ignis uses the least fuel at 4.9L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched — Suzuki Ignis and Mazda CX-3 all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which has the most boot space?

The Mazda CX-3 has the largest boot at 350L.

Which can tow the most?

The Mazda CX-3 has the highest braked towing capacity at 1,000kg.

Which has the best warranty?

The Mazda CX-3 has the longest warranty at 5 years / 1000k km.

Which is the most powerful?

The Mazda CX-3 makes the most power at 110kW. The Mazda CX-3 is quickest to 100km/h in 10.9s.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs