CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsToyota Aurion vs BMW 3 Series
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Toyota Aurion vs BMW 3 Series

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular Sedans compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

Specifications in progress

Toyota Aurion: we're still completing price, 0-100km/h and ground clearance.

A blank cell below means we don't have that figure, not that the car scores badly on it. We leave them empty rather than estimate, so any row where one car is blank isn't a like-for-like comparison yet.

SpecToyotaBMW
Price (RRP)TBC$94,700
Fuel typePetrolPetrol
Power200kW190kW
0-100 km/h5.8s
Fuel Economy9.3 L/100km6.5 L/100km
Boot Space515L480L
Towing1,600kg1,600kg
Warranty3yr / 100k km5yr / Unlimited
ANCAP Safety5 StarsNo data

Track the Toyota Aurion & BMW 3 Series

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

Pricing for one or both models is yet to be confirmed for the Australian market. We will update this comparison when official RRPs are announced.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Feature Showdown

Both come with modern infotainment systems.

The BMW 3 Series counters with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto and Harman Kardon audio. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Interior trim differs: the Toyota Aurion gets leather upholstery while the BMW 3 Series offers sensatec synthetic leather.

Drivetrain

The Toyota Aurion uses a 2GR-FE 3.5L V6 petrol producing 200kW and 336Nm of torque, sent through a 6-speed automatic to a FWD layout.

The BMW 3 Series responds with a Petrol making 190kW and 400Nm, paired to a auto driving the rear wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 5.8 seconds.

The Toyota Aurion has the clear power advantage at 200kW vs 190kW. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Toyota Aurion measures 4,835mm long on a 2,775mm wheelbase, 122mm longer than the BMW 3 Series at 4,713mm (2,851mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the BMW 3 Series generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 515L in the Toyota Aurion and 480L in the BMW 3 Series, giving the Toyota Aurion a 35L advantage.

For towing, the BMW 3 Series leads with a 1,600kg braked capacity vs 1,600kg. That 0kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

11.0m to 11.0m

TightestToyota Aurion ProdigyTightest turn at 11.0m, easiest U-turns and carparks
Toyota Aurion Prodigy
11.0mTighter
Best
BMW 3 Series 330i Sedan
11.0m
Best
Toyota Aurion Prodigy
11.0m · Good

Based on 11.0m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
BMW 3 Series 330i Sedan
11.0m · Good

Based on 11.0m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Compare U-turns side by side

Turning Circle · U-turn compare

kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars
Tap to add/remove
TightestToyota AurionTightest turn at 11.0m, needs the least road to swing around
Toyota AurionTightest11.0 m
Good△ 3-point
BMW 3 Series11.0 m
Good△ 3-point
Scrub the turn

0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep

Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $2,651/year for the Toyota Aurion and $1,853/year for the BMW 3 Series. That is a $798 annual difference in favour of the BMW 3 Series.

Warranty: 3 years / 100,000km (Toyota Aurion) vs 5 years / 999,999km (BMW 3 Series). The BMW 3 Series has longer coverage. Capped-price servicing: 4yr (Toyota Aurion)—.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Toyota Aurion if: You prioritise performance, need more boot space, or prefer Toyota's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the BMW 3 Series if: You want lower running costs, value a longer warranty, or prefer BMW's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

This is genuinely close. The Toyota Aurion and BMW 3 Series trade blows across the spec sheet, and neither runs away with an outright win. The BMW 3 Series will save you roughly $798 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Toyota Aurion has a clear edge. The BMW 3 Series adds peace of mind with a longer 5-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Toyota Aurion and BMW 3 Series?

The BMW 3 Series is the cheapest at $94,700 before on-road costs.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The BMW 3 Series uses the least fuel at 6.5L/100km on the combined cycle.

What are the ANCAP safety ratings?

Toyota Aurion holds a 5-star ANCAP rating. We have no published ANCAP rating for BMW 3 Series, so there is nothing to compare on crash performance. Compare the active-safety features above instead.

Which has the most boot space?

The Toyota Aurion has the largest boot at 515L.

Which can tow the most?

The Toyota Aurion has the highest braked towing capacity at 1,600kg.

Which has the best warranty?

The BMW 3 Series has the longest warranty at 5 years / Unlimited.

Which is the most powerful?

The Toyota Aurion makes the most power at 200kW.

Free newsletter

Stay across the market

Get our weekly new-car rundown of launches, price moves, deals and reviews, straight from the data.

  • Weekly new-car rundown
  • Price cuts and new deals
  • New launches and reviews

No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All Sedans · Best family cars