CS
CarSorted
Home›Comparisons›Toyota Camry vs Volvo S40
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Toyota Camry vs Volvo S40

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular Sedans compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

Data checked: specs 12 Aug 2026, price 6 Sep 2026

Specifications in progress

Volvo S40: we're still completing price, kerb weight, seat count, warranty and ground clearance.

A blank cell below means we don't have that figure, not that the car scores badly on it. We leave them empty rather than estimate, so any row where one car is blank isn't a like-for-like comparison yet.

SpecToyotaVolvo
Price (RRP)$39,990TBC
Fuel typeHybridPetrol
Power170kW125kW
0-100 km/h8.1s8.9s
Fuel Economy4 L/100km9.1 L/100km
Boot (seats up)524L404L
Towing1,200kg1,500kg
Warranty5yr / Unlimited—
ANCAP Safety5 StarsNo data

Track the Toyota Camry & Volvo S40

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

Pricing for one or both models is yet to be confirmed for the Australian market. We will update this comparison when official RRPs are announced.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Feature Showdown

Both come with modern infotainment systems.

The Toyota Camry stands out with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto — features our data doesn't list for the Volvo S40. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Drivetrain

The Toyota Camry uses a 2.5L 4-cyl Dual VVT-i Hybrid producing 170kW and 221Nm of torque, sent through a cvt to a FWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 8.1 seconds.

The Volvo S40 lines up making 125kW and 230Nm, paired to a 5-speed geartronic automatic driving the front wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 8.9 seconds.

The Toyota Camry has the clear power advantage at 170kW vs 125kW. In the 0-100 sprint (manufacturer-claimed), the Toyota Camry is 0.8s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Toyota Camry measures 4,920mm long on a 2,825mm wheelbase, 444mm longer than the Volvo S40 at 4,476mm (2,640mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Toyota Camry generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 524L in the Toyota Camry and 404L in the Volvo S40, giving the Toyota Camry a 120L advantage.

For towing, the Volvo S40 leads with a 1,500kg braked capacity vs 1,200kg. That 300kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

10.6m to 11.2m

TightestVolvo S40 2.4i GeartronicTightest turn at 10.6m, easiest U-turns and carparks
Volvo S40 2.4i Geartronic
10.6mTighter
Best
Toyota Camry Ascent Hybrid
11.2m
Worst
Toyota Camry Ascent Hybrid
11.2m · Average

Based on 11.2m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Volvo S40 2.4i Geartronic
10.6m · Good

Based on 10.6m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Compare U-turns side by side

Turning Circle · U-turn compare

kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars
Tap to add/remove
TightestVolvo S40Tightest turn at 10.6m, needs the least road to swing around
Toyota Camry11.2 m
Average△ 3-point
Volvo S40Tightest10.6 m
Good△ 3-point
Scrub the turn

0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep

Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $1,140/year for the Toyota Camry and $2,594/year for the Volvo S40. That is a $1,454 annual difference in favour of the Toyota Camry.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Toyota Camry if: You prioritise performance, need more boot space, want lower running costs, or prefer Toyota's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Volvo S40 if: You need stronger towing, or prefer Volvo's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Toyota Camry comes out ahead on the CarSorted Score (75 vs 36), taking 4 of 5 key spec rows below. The deciding gaps: safety (Toyota Camry ahead by 61), value (Toyota Camry ahead by 47), fuel economy (Toyota Camry ahead by 46). The Toyota Camry will save you roughly $1,454 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Toyota Camry has a clear edge. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Toyota Camry and Volvo S40?

The Toyota Camry is the cheapest at $39,990 before on-road costs.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Toyota Camry uses the least fuel at 4L/100km on the combined cycle.

What are the ANCAP safety ratings?

Toyota Camry holds a 5-star ANCAP rating. We have no published ANCAP rating for Volvo S40, so there is nothing to compare on crash performance. Compare the active-safety features above instead.

Which has the most boot space?

The Toyota Camry has the largest boot at 524L with the seats up.

Which can tow the most?

The Volvo S40 has the highest braked towing capacity at 1,500kg.

Which is the most powerful?

The Toyota Camry makes the most power at 170kW. The Toyota Camry is quickest to 100km/h in 8.1s.

Free newsletter

Stay across the market

Get our weekly new-car rundown of launches, price moves, deals and reviews, straight from the data.

  • Weekly new-car rundown
  • Price cuts and new deals
  • New launches and reviews

No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All Sedans · Best hybrid cars · Best family cars