Toyota LandCruiser Prado vs Isuzu MU-X
A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.
Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.
Toyota LandCruiser Prado
From $73,200
SUV
2.8L 4-cyl Turbo-Diesel 48V V-Active
150kW
10.6 L/100km
5★ ANCAP
390L
Isuzu MU-X
From $43,900
SUV
Diesel
120kW
6.4 L/100km
5★ ANCAP
311L
Price Breakdown
The Toyota LandCruiser Prado starts from $73,200 before on-road costs, while the Isuzu MU-X opens at $43,900. That makes the Isuzu MU-X the more affordable entry point by $29,300.
Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $80,520 and $48,290 respectively.
Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Isuzu MU-X by roughly $5,985 in fuel alone.
Safety Rundown
Both the Toyota LandCruiser Prado and Isuzu MU-X hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating. Adult occupant protection scored 85% for the Toyota LandCruiser Prado and 86% for the Isuzu MU-X.
Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. The Isuzu MU-X packs more ADAS features with 6 out of 10 key systems fitted, compared to 5 in the Toyota LandCruiser Prado.
Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, lane keep assist, adaptive cruise control, a reversing camera. Airbag count is 9 in the Toyota LandCruiser Prado and 8 in the Isuzu MU-X.
Feature Showdown
The Toyota LandCruiser Prado features a 12.3-inch touchscreen, while the Isuzu MU-X gets a 8-inch display and 4.2-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.
Drivetrain
The Toyota LandCruiser Prado uses a 2.8L 4-cyl Turbo-Diesel 48V V-Active producing 150kW and 500Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a 4WD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 9.6 seconds.
The Isuzu MU-X responds with a Diesel making 120kW and 400Nm, paired to a automatic driving the rear wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 11 seconds.
The Toyota LandCruiser Prado has the clear power advantage at 150kW vs 120kW. In the real-world sprint, the Toyota LandCruiser Prado is 1.4s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.
Space & Comfort
The Toyota LandCruiser Prado measures 4,990mm long on a 2,850mm wheelbase, 130mm longer than the Isuzu MU-X at 4,860mm (2,855mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Isuzu MU-X generally means more rear legroom.
Boot space is 390L in the Toyota LandCruiser Prado and 311L in the Isuzu MU-X, giving the Toyota LandCruiser Prado a 79L advantage. The Isuzu MU-X seats 7 vs 5.
For towing, the Isuzu MU-X leads with a 3,500kg braked capacity vs 3,500kg. That 0kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.
Turning Circle
Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.
11.6m to 11.8m
Based on 11.8m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Based on 11.6m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Turning circle ratings
True Cost to Own
Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $3,021/year for the Toyota LandCruiser Prado and $1,824/year for the Isuzu MU-X. That is a $1,197 annual difference in favour of the Isuzu MU-X.
Estimated annual total: $3,021 (Toyota LandCruiser Prado) vs $1,824 (Isuzu MU-X). The Isuzu MU-X saves you roughly $1,197 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.
Warranty: 5 years / 999,999km (Toyota LandCruiser Prado) vs 6 years / 150,000km (Isuzu MU-X). The Isuzu MU-X has longer coverage.
Who Should Buy Which?
Buy the Toyota LandCruiser Prado if: You prioritise performance, need more boot space, or prefer Toyota's approach to design and ownership experience.
Buy the Isuzu MU-X if: You want the lower entry price, want lower running costs, value a longer warranty, or prefer Isuzu's approach to design and ownership experience.
The Verdict
This is genuinely close. The Toyota LandCruiser Prado and Isuzu MU-X trade blows across the spec sheet, and neither runs away with an outright win. The Isuzu MU-X will save you roughly $1,197 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Toyota LandCruiser Prado has a clear edge. The Isuzu MU-X adds peace of mind with a longer 6-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.
Common questions
Which is cheapest, Toyota LandCruiser Prado and Isuzu MU-X?
The Isuzu MU-X is the cheapest at $43,900 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Toyota LandCruiser Prado by $29,300.
Which is the most fuel-efficient?
The Isuzu MU-X uses the least fuel at 6.4L/100km on the combined cycle.
Which is safest?
They are evenly matched — Toyota LandCruiser Prado and Isuzu MU-X all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.
Which has the most boot space?
The Toyota LandCruiser Prado has the largest boot at 390L.
Which can tow the most?
The Toyota LandCruiser Prado has the highest braked towing capacity at 3,500kg.
Which has the best warranty?
The Isuzu MU-X has the longest warranty at 6 years / 150k km.
Which is the most powerful?
The Toyota LandCruiser Prado makes the most power at 150kW. The Toyota LandCruiser Prado is quickest to 100km/h in 9.6s.
Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.
Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026
Comments (0)
Sign in to join the conversation
No comments yet. Be the first!
