CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsToyota RAV4 vs MG QS
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Toyota RAV4 vs MG QS

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecToyotaMG
Price (RRP)$45,990$46,990
Power143kW153kW
0-100 km/h8.4s
Fuel Economy6.6 L/100km8.4 L/100km
Boot Space580L203L
Towing800kg2,000kg
Warranty5yr / unlimited10yr / 250k km
ANCAP Safety5 Stars5 Stars

Price Breakdown

The Toyota RAV4 starts from $45,990 before on-road costs, while the MG QS opens at $46,990. That makes the Toyota RAV4 the more affordable entry point by $1,000.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $50,589 and $51,689 respectively.

Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Toyota RAV4 by roughly $2,565 in fuel alone.

Safety Rundown

Both the Toyota RAV4 and MG QS hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating. Adult occupant protection scored 93% for the Toyota RAV4 and 88% for the MG QS.

Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. Both models are evenly matched with 7 out of 10 key ADAS systems.

Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, lane keep assist, adaptive cruise control, a reversing camera. Airbag count is 8 in the Toyota RAV4 and 7 in the MG QS. The MG QS adds a 360-degree camera that the Toyota RAV4 misses.

Feature Showdown

The Toyota RAV4 features a 10.5-inch touchscreen, while the MG QS gets a 12.3-inch display and 12.3-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The MG QS counters with panoramic roof, power tailgate and ambient lighting that the Toyota RAV4 does not offer. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Drivetrain

The Toyota RAV4 uses a Petrol Hybrid producing 143kW and 221Nm of torque, sent through a cvt (e-cvt) to a FWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 8.4 seconds.

The MG QS responds with a 2.0L Turbo Petrol making 153kW and 360Nm, paired to a automatic driving the front wheels.

The MG QS has the clear power advantage at 153kW vs 143kW. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Toyota RAV4 measures 4,600mm long on a 2,690mm wheelbase, 383mm shorter than the MG QS at 4,983mm (2,915mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the MG QS generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 580L in the Toyota RAV4 and 203L in the MG QS, giving the Toyota RAV4 a 377L advantage. The MG QS seats 7 vs 5.

For towing, the MG QS leads with a 2,000kg braked capacity vs 800kg. That 1,200kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

10.6m diameter

Good

Toyota RAV4 GX Hybrid 2WD
10.6m
Toyota RAV4
10.6m · Good

Based on 10.6m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $1,881/year for the Toyota RAV4 and $2,394/year for the MG QS. That is a $513 annual difference in favour of the Toyota RAV4.

Estimated annual total: $1,881 (Toyota RAV4) vs $2,394 (MG QS). The Toyota RAV4 saves you roughly $513 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 5 years (Toyota RAV4) vs 10 years / 250,000km (MG QS). The MG QS has longer coverage.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Toyota RAV4 if: You want the lower entry price, need more boot space, want lower running costs, or prefer Toyota's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the MG QS if: You prioritise performance, value a longer warranty, need stronger towing, or prefer MG's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

This is genuinely close. The Toyota RAV4 and MG QS trade blows across the spec sheet, and neither runs away with an outright win. The Toyota RAV4 will save you roughly $513 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Toyota RAV4 has a clear edge. The MG QS adds peace of mind with a longer 10-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Toyota RAV4 and MG QS?

The Toyota RAV4 is the cheapest at $45,990 before on-road costs. That undercuts the MG QS by $1,000.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Toyota RAV4 uses the least fuel at 6.6L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched — Toyota RAV4 and MG QS all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which has the most boot space?

The Toyota RAV4 has the largest boot at 580L.

Which can tow the most?

The MG QS has the highest braked towing capacity at 2,000kg.

Which has the best warranty?

The MG QS has the longest warranty at 10 years / 250k km.

Which is the most powerful?

The MG QS makes the most power at 153kW.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs