CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsMG QS vs Volkswagen Tayron
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

MG QS vs Volkswagen Tayron

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecMGVolkswagen
Price (RRP)$46,990$48,290
Fuel typePetrolPetrol
Power153kW110kW
Fuel Economy8.4 L/100km7.6 L/100km
Boot Space203L345L
Towing2,000kg1,800kg
Warranty10yr / 250k km5yr / Unlimited
ANCAP Safety5 Stars5 Stars

Track the MG QS & Volkswagen Tayron

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

The MG QS starts from $46,990 before on-road costs, while the Volkswagen Tayron opens at $48,290. That makes the MG QS the more affordable entry point by $1,300.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $51,689 and $53,119 respectively.

Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Volkswagen Tayron by roughly $1,140 in fuel alone.

Safety Rundown

Both the MG QS and Volkswagen Tayron hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating. Adult occupant protection scored 88% for the MG QS and 87% for the Volkswagen Tayron.

Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. The MG QS packs more ADAS features with 7 out of 10 key systems fitted, compared to 6 in the Volkswagen Tayron.

Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, lane keep assist, adaptive cruise control, a reversing camera. Airbag count is 7 in the MG QS and 9 in the Volkswagen Tayron.

Feature Showdown

The MG QS features a 12.3-inch touchscreen paired with a 12.3-inch digital dash, while the Volkswagen Tayron gets a 12.9-inch display and 10.3-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The MG QS stands out with panoramic roof and ambient lighting that you will not find on the Volkswagen Tayron. The Volkswagen Tayron counters with wireless charging. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Interior trim differs: the MG QS gets fabric upholstery while the Volkswagen Tayron offers cloth.

Drivetrain

The MG QS uses a 2.0L Turbo Petrol producing 153kW and 360Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a FWD layout.

The Volkswagen Tayron responds with a Petrol making 110kW and 250Nm, paired to a auto driving the front wheels.

The MG QS has the clear power advantage at 153kW vs 110kW. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The MG QS measures 4,983mm long on a 2,915mm wheelbase, 191mm longer than the Volkswagen Tayron at 4,792mm (2,790mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the MG QS generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 203L in the MG QS and 345L in the Volkswagen Tayron, giving the Volkswagen Tayron a 142L advantage.

For towing, the MG QS leads with a 2,000kg braked capacity vs 1,800kg. That 200kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

12.1m diameter

Large

Volkswagen Tayron 110TSI Life
12.1m
Volkswagen Tayron 110TSI Life
12.1m · Large

Based on 12.1m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $2,394/year for the MG QS and $2,166/year for the Volkswagen Tayron. That is a $228 annual difference in favour of the Volkswagen Tayron.

Estimated annual total: $2,394 (MG QS) vs $2,166 (Volkswagen Tayron). The Volkswagen Tayron saves you roughly $228 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 10 years / 250,000km (MG QS) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Volkswagen Tayron). The MG QS has longer coverage.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the MG QS if: You want the lower entry price, prioritise performance, value a longer warranty, need stronger towing, or prefer MG's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Volkswagen Tayron if: You need more boot space, want lower running costs, or prefer Volkswagen's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The MG QS takes 4 of 6 key spec categories and comes in at a lower price. The Volkswagen Tayron will save you roughly $228 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Volkswagen Tayron has a clear edge. The MG QS adds peace of mind with a longer 10-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, MG QS and Volkswagen Tayron?

The MG QS is the cheapest at $46,990 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Volkswagen Tayron by $1,300.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Volkswagen Tayron uses the least fuel at 7.6L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched — MG QS and Volkswagen Tayron all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which has the most boot space?

The Volkswagen Tayron has the largest boot at 345L.

Which can tow the most?

The MG QS has the highest braked towing capacity at 2,000kg.

Which has the best warranty?

The MG QS has the longest warranty at 10 years / 250k km.

Which is the most powerful?

The MG QS makes the most power at 153kW.

Free: Chinese Cars in Australia Cheat Sheet

Sign up free and we'll email you our Chinese Cars Cheat Sheet (PDF) — all 22 brands ranked on service, parts, warranty and dealer experience. Plus new-car launches, reviews and founding-member pricing on the upcoming CarSorted Pro Report. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.

By subscribing, you agree to receive marketing emails. You can unsubscribe at any time. View our Privacy Policy.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs · Best mid-size SUVs