CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsMG QS vs Toyota RAV4
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

MG QS vs Toyota RAV4

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecMGToyota
Price (RRP)$46,990$45,990
Power153kW143kW
0-100 km/h8.4s
Fuel Economy8.4 L/100km6.6 L/100km
Boot Space203L580L
Towing2,000kg800kg
Warranty10yr / 250k km5yr / unlimited
ANCAP Safety5 Stars5 Stars

Price Breakdown

The MG QS starts from $46,990 before on-road costs, while the Toyota RAV4 opens at $45,990. That makes the Toyota RAV4 the more affordable entry point by $1,000.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $51,689 and $50,589 respectively.

Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Toyota RAV4 by roughly $2,565 in fuel alone.

Safety Rundown

Both the MG QS and Toyota RAV4 hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating. Adult occupant protection scored 88% for the MG QS and 93% for the Toyota RAV4.

Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. Both models are evenly matched with 7 out of 10 key ADAS systems.

Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, lane keep assist, adaptive cruise control, a reversing camera. Airbag count is 7 in the MG QS and 8 in the Toyota RAV4. The MG QS adds a 360-degree camera that the Toyota RAV4 misses.

Feature Showdown

The MG QS features a 12.3-inch touchscreen paired with a 12.3-inch digital dash, while the Toyota RAV4 gets a 10.5-inch display. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The MG QS stands out with panoramic roof, power tailgate and ambient lighting that you will not find on the Toyota RAV4. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Drivetrain

The MG QS uses a 2.0L Turbo Petrol producing 153kW and 360Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a FWD layout.

The Toyota RAV4 responds with a Petrol Hybrid making 143kW and 221Nm, paired to a cvt (e-cvt) driving the front wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 8.4 seconds.

The MG QS has the clear power advantage at 153kW vs 143kW. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The MG QS measures 4,983mm long on a 2,915mm wheelbase, 383mm longer than the Toyota RAV4 at 4,600mm (2,690mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the MG QS generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 203L in the MG QS and 580L in the Toyota RAV4, giving the Toyota RAV4 a 377L advantage. The MG QS seats 7 vs 5.

For towing, the MG QS leads with a 2,000kg braked capacity vs 800kg. That 1,200kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

10.6m diameter

Good

Toyota RAV4 GX Hybrid 2WD
10.6m
Toyota RAV4
10.6m · Good

Based on 10.6m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $2,394/year for the MG QS and $1,881/year for the Toyota RAV4. That is a $513 annual difference in favour of the Toyota RAV4.

Estimated annual total: $2,394 (MG QS) vs $1,881 (Toyota RAV4). The Toyota RAV4 saves you roughly $513 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 10 years / 250,000km (MG QS) vs 5 years (Toyota RAV4). The MG QS has longer coverage.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the MG QS if: You prioritise performance, value a longer warranty, need stronger towing, or prefer MG's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Toyota RAV4 if: You want the lower entry price, need more boot space, want lower running costs, or prefer Toyota's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

This is genuinely close. The MG QS and Toyota RAV4 trade blows across the spec sheet, and neither runs away with an outright win. The Toyota RAV4 will save you roughly $513 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Toyota RAV4 has a clear edge. The MG QS adds peace of mind with a longer 10-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Published by CarSorted Editorial Team · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs