Land Rover Defender 130 vs Porsche Cayenne
A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.
Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.
Land Rover Defender 130
From $114,500
SUV
3.0 i6 D350 Diesel Mild Hybrid
257kW
8.1 L/100km
5★ ANCAP
389L
Porsche Cayenne
From $138,800
SUV
Petrol
260kW
12.2 L/100km
5★ ANCAP
698L
Price Breakdown
The Land Rover Defender 130 starts from $114,500 before on-road costs, while the Porsche Cayenne opens at $138,800. That makes the Land Rover Defender 130 the more affordable entry point by $24,300.
Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $125,950 and $152,680 respectively.
Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Land Rover Defender 130 by roughly $5,840 in fuel alone.
Safety Rundown
Both the Land Rover Defender 130 and Porsche Cayenne hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating.
Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. Both models are evenly matched with 7 out of 10 key ADAS systems.
Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, lane keep assist, adaptive cruise control, a reversing camera.
Feature Showdown
Both come with modern infotainment systems. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.
The Land Rover Defender 130 stands out with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto, wireless charging, Meridian audio and ambient lighting that you will not find on the Porsche Cayenne. The Porsche Cayenne counters with Apple CarPlay, head-up display, panoramic roof, power tailgate and BOSE audio. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.
Drivetrain
The Land Rover Defender 130 uses a 3.0 i6 D350 Diesel Mild Hybrid producing 257kW and 700Nm of torque, sent through a 8-speed automatic to a AWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 6.8 seconds.
The Porsche Cayenne responds with a Petrol making 260kW and 500Nm, paired to a 8-speed auto driving all four wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 5.7 seconds.
The Porsche Cayenne has the clear power advantage at 260kW vs 257kW. In the real-world sprint, the Porsche Cayenne is 1.1s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.
Space & Comfort
The Land Rover Defender 130 measures 5,099mm long on a 3,587mm wheelbase, 169mm longer than the Porsche Cayenne at 4,930mm (2,895mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Land Rover Defender 130 generally means more rear legroom.
Boot space is 389L in the Land Rover Defender 130 and 698L in the Porsche Cayenne, giving the Porsche Cayenne a 309L advantage. The Land Rover Defender 130 seats 7 vs 5.
For towing, the Porsche Cayenne leads with a 3,500kg braked capacity vs 3,000kg. That 500kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.
Turning Circle
Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.
12.8m diameter
Large
Based on 12.8m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Turning circle ratings
True Cost to Own
Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $2,309/year for the Land Rover Defender 130 and $3,477/year for the Porsche Cayenne. That is a $1,168 annual difference in favour of the Land Rover Defender 130.
Estimated annual total: $2,309 (Land Rover Defender 130) vs $3,477 (Porsche Cayenne). The Land Rover Defender 130 saves you roughly $1,168 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.
Warranty: 5 years / 999,999km (Land Rover Defender 130) vs 3 years / 999,999km (Porsche Cayenne). The Land Rover Defender 130 has longer coverage.
Who Should Buy Which?
Buy the Land Rover Defender 130 if: You want the lower entry price, want lower running costs, value a longer warranty, or prefer Land Rover's approach to design and ownership experience.
Buy the Porsche Cayenne if: You prioritise performance, need more boot space, need stronger towing, or prefer Porsche's approach to design and ownership experience.
The Verdict
The Porsche Cayenne takes 4 of 7 key spec categories. The Land Rover Defender 130 will save you roughly $1,168 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Porsche Cayenne has a clear edge. The Land Rover Defender 130 adds peace of mind with a longer 5-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.
Common questions
Which is cheapest, Land Rover Defender 130 and Porsche Cayenne?
The Land Rover Defender 130 is the cheapest at $114,500 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Porsche Cayenne by $24,300.
Which is the most fuel-efficient?
The Land Rover Defender 130 uses the least fuel at 8.1L/100km on the combined cycle.
Which is safest?
They are evenly matched — Land Rover Defender 130 and Porsche Cayenne all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.
Which has the most boot space?
The Porsche Cayenne has the largest boot at 698L.
Which can tow the most?
The Porsche Cayenne has the highest braked towing capacity at 3,500kg.
Which has the best warranty?
The Land Rover Defender 130 has the longest warranty at 5 years / 1000k km.
Which is the most powerful?
The Porsche Cayenne makes the most power at 260kW. The Porsche Cayenne is quickest to 100km/h in 5.7s.
Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.
Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026
Comments (0)
Sign in to join the conversation
No comments yet. Be the first!
