CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsLand Rover Defender OCTA vs Audi Q8
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Land Rover Defender OCTA vs Audi Q8

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecLand RoverAudi
Price (RRP)$304,500$143,415
Power467kW210kW
0-100 km/h4s6.1s
Fuel Economy13.1 L/100km8.4 L/100km
Boot Space972L660L
Towing3,500kg3,500kg
Warranty5yr / 999.999k km5yr / 999.999k km
ANCAP Safety5 Stars5 Stars

Price Breakdown

The Land Rover Defender OCTA starts from $304,500 before on-road costs, while the Audi Q8 opens at $143,415. That makes the Audi Q8 the more affordable entry point by $161,085.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $334,950 and $157,757 respectively.

Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Audi Q8 by roughly $6,700 in fuel alone.

Safety Rundown

Both the Land Rover Defender OCTA and Audi Q8 hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating. Adult occupant protection scored 85% for the Land Rover Defender OCTA and 91% for the Audi Q8.

Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. The Audi Q8 packs more ADAS features with 9 out of 10 key systems fitted, compared to 7 in the Land Rover Defender OCTA.

Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, lane keep assist, adaptive cruise control, a reversing camera. Airbag count is 6 in the Land Rover Defender OCTA and 8 in the Audi Q8.

Feature Showdown

The Land Rover Defender OCTA features a 13.1-inch touchscreen, while the Audi Q8 gets a 10.1-inch display. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The Land Rover Defender OCTA stands out with Meridian audio that you will not find on the Audi Q8. The Audi Q8 counters with head-up display and Bang & Olufsen audio. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Interior trim differs: the Land Rover Defender OCTA gets semi-aniline leather upholstery while the Audi Q8 offers leather. Climate control is 3-zone in the Land Rover Defender OCTA and 4-zone in the Audi Q8.

Drivetrain

The Land Rover Defender OCTA uses a 4.4L V8 Twin-Turbo Petrol Mild Hybrid producing 467kW and 750Nm of torque, sent through a 8-speed automatic to a AWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 4 seconds.

The Audi Q8 responds with a Diesel MHEV making 210kW and 600Nm, paired to a automatic driving all four wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 6.1 seconds.

The Land Rover Defender OCTA has the clear power advantage at 467kW vs 210kW. In the real-world sprint, the Land Rover Defender OCTA is 2.1s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Land Rover Defender OCTA measures 4,813mm long on a 3,023mm wheelbase, 173mm shorter than the Audi Q8 at 4,986mm (2,995mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Land Rover Defender OCTA generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 972L in the Land Rover Defender OCTA and 660L in the Audi Q8, giving the Land Rover Defender OCTA a 312L advantage.

For towing, the Audi Q8 leads with a 3,500kg braked capacity vs 3,500kg. That 0kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

12.5m to 12.8m

Audi Q8 50 TDI quattro S line
12.5mTighter
Best
Land Rover Defender OCTA OCTA
12.8m
Worst
Land Rover Defender OCTA
12.8m · Large

Based on 12.8m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Audi Q8
12.5m · Large

Based on 12.5m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $3,734/year for the Land Rover Defender OCTA and $2,394/year for the Audi Q8. That is a $1,340 annual difference in favour of the Audi Q8.

Estimated annual total: $3,734 (Land Rover Defender OCTA) vs $2,394 (Audi Q8). The Audi Q8 saves you roughly $1,340 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 5 years / 999,999km (Land Rover Defender OCTA) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Audi Q8). Both match on warranty length.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Land Rover Defender OCTA if: You prioritise performance, need more boot space, or prefer Land Rover's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Audi Q8 if: You want the lower entry price, want lower running costs, or prefer Audi's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Land Rover Defender OCTA takes 3 of 5 key spec categories. The Audi Q8 will save you roughly $1,340 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Land Rover Defender OCTA has a clear edge. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Land Rover Defender OCTA and Audi Q8?

The Audi Q8 is the cheapest at $143,415 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Land Rover Defender OCTA by $161,085.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Audi Q8 uses the least fuel at 8.4L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched — Land Rover Defender OCTA and Audi Q8 all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which has the most boot space?

The Land Rover Defender OCTA has the largest boot at 972L.

Which can tow the most?

The Land Rover Defender OCTA has the highest braked towing capacity at 3,500kg.

Which is the most powerful?

The Land Rover Defender OCTA makes the most power at 467kW. The Land Rover Defender OCTA is quickest to 100km/h in 4s.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs