CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsIsuzu MU-X vs Audi Q3
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Isuzu MU-X vs Audi Q3

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecIsuzuAudi
Price (RRP)$43,900$61,600
Power120kW110kW
0-100 km/h11s9.1s
Fuel Economy6.4 L/100km5.7 L/100km
Boot Space311L575L
Towing3,500kg1,200kg
Warranty6yr / 150k km5yr / 999.999k km
ANCAP Safety5 Stars5 Stars

Price Breakdown

The Isuzu MU-X starts from $43,900 before on-road costs, while the Audi Q3 opens at $61,600. That makes the Isuzu MU-X the more affordable entry point by $17,700.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $48,290 and $67,760 respectively.

Over 5 years, the running costs are nearly identical since both have similar efficiency.

Safety Rundown

Both the Isuzu MU-X and Audi Q3 hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating. Adult occupant protection scored 86% for the Isuzu MU-X and 87% for the Audi Q3.

Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. The Isuzu MU-X packs more ADAS features with 6 out of 10 key systems fitted, compared to 3 in the Audi Q3.

Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, a reversing camera. Airbag count is 8 in the Isuzu MU-X and 6 in the Audi Q3.

Feature Showdown

The Isuzu MU-X features a 8-inch touchscreen paired with a 4.2-inch digital dash, while the Audi Q3 gets a 12.8-inch display. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The Isuzu MU-X stands out with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto that you will not find on the Audi Q3. The Audi Q3 counters with Apple CarPlay, power tailgate and ambient lighting. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Drivetrain

The Isuzu MU-X uses a Diesel producing 120kW and 400Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a RWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 11 seconds.

The Audi Q3 responds with a 4-cylinder inline petrol with turbocharging, MHEV technology and Cylinder on Demand (CoD) making 110kW and 250Nm, paired to a 7-speed s tronic driving the front wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 9.1 seconds.

The Isuzu MU-X has the clear power advantage at 120kW vs 110kW. In the real-world sprint, the Audi Q3 is 1.9s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Isuzu MU-X measures 4,860mm long on a 2,855mm wheelbase, 329mm longer than the Audi Q3 at 4,531mm (2,681mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Isuzu MU-X generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 311L in the Isuzu MU-X and 575L in the Audi Q3, giving the Audi Q3 a 264L advantage. The Isuzu MU-X seats 7 vs 5.

For towing, the Isuzu MU-X leads with a 3,500kg braked capacity vs 1,200kg. That 2,300kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

11.6m to 11.7m

Isuzu MU-X LS-M 2.2L 4x2
11.6mTighter
Best
Audi Q3 TFSI 110 kW SUV
11.7m
Worst
Isuzu MU-X
11.6m · Average

Based on 11.6m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Audi Q3
11.7m · Average

Based on 11.7m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $1,824/year for the Isuzu MU-X and $1,625/year for the Audi Q3. That is a $199 annual difference in favour of the Audi Q3.

Estimated annual total: $1,824 (Isuzu MU-X) vs $1,625 (Audi Q3). The Audi Q3 saves you roughly $199 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 6 years / 150,000km (Isuzu MU-X) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Audi Q3). The Isuzu MU-X has longer coverage.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Isuzu MU-X if: You want the lower entry price, prioritise performance, value a longer warranty, need stronger towing, or prefer Isuzu's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Audi Q3 if: You need more boot space, want lower running costs, or prefer Audi's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Isuzu MU-X takes 4 of 7 key spec categories and comes in at a lower price. The Audi Q3 will save you roughly $199 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Audi Q3 has a clear edge. The Isuzu MU-X adds peace of mind with a longer 6-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Isuzu MU-X and Audi Q3?

The Isuzu MU-X is the cheapest at $43,900 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Audi Q3 by $17,700.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Audi Q3 uses the least fuel at 5.7L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched — Isuzu MU-X and Audi Q3 all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which has the most boot space?

The Audi Q3 has the largest boot at 575L.

Which can tow the most?

The Isuzu MU-X has the highest braked towing capacity at 3,500kg.

Which has the best warranty?

The Isuzu MU-X has the longest warranty at 6 years / 150k km.

Which is the most powerful?

The Isuzu MU-X makes the most power at 120kW. The Audi Q3 is quickest to 100km/h in 9.1s.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs