CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsHonda CR-V vs Audi Q2
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Honda CR-V vs Audi Q2

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecHondaAudi
Price (RRP)$39,900$49,400
Power140kW110kW
0-100 km/h8.2s8.8s
Fuel Economy6.7 L/100km6.1 L/100km
Boot Space561L356L
Towing1,500kg1,200kg
Warranty5yr / 999.999k km5yr / 999.999k km
ANCAP Safety5 StarsNo data

Price Breakdown

The Honda CR-V starts from $39,900 before on-road costs, while the Audi Q2 opens at $49,400. That makes the Honda CR-V the more affordable entry point by $9,500.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $43,890 and $54,340 respectively.

Over 5 years, the running costs are nearly identical since both have similar efficiency.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Feature Showdown

The Honda CR-V features a 9-inch touchscreen paired with a 7-inch digital dash, while the Audi Q2 gets a 8.8-inch display. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The Audi Q2 counters with Bang & Olufsen audio and ambient lighting that the Honda CR-V does not offer. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Drivetrain

The Honda CR-V uses a Petrol producing 140kW and 240Nm of torque, sent through a cvt to a FWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 8.2 seconds.

The Audi Q2 responds with a Petrol making 110kW and 250Nm, paired to a s tronic driving the front wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 8.8 seconds.

The Honda CR-V has the clear power advantage at 140kW vs 110kW. In the real-world sprint, the Honda CR-V is 0.6s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Honda CR-V measures 4,704mm long on a 2,701mm wheelbase, 496mm longer than the Audi Q2 at 4,208mm (2,601mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Honda CR-V generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 561L in the Honda CR-V and 356L in the Audi Q2, giving the Honda CR-V a 205L advantage.

For towing, the Honda CR-V leads with a 1,500kg braked capacity vs 1,200kg. That 300kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

10.5m to 12.0m

Audi Q2 35 TFSI
10.5mTighter
Best
Honda CR-V VTi L
12.0m
Worst
Honda CR-V
12.0m · Average

Based on 12.0m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Audi Q2
10.5m · Good

Based on 10.5m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $1,910/year for the Honda CR-V and $1,739/year for the Audi Q2. That is a $171 annual difference in favour of the Audi Q2.

Estimated annual total: $1,910 (Honda CR-V) vs $1,739 (Audi Q2). The Audi Q2 saves you roughly $171 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 5 years / 999,999km (Honda CR-V) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Audi Q2). Both match on warranty length. Capped-price servicing: 5yr (Honda CR-V)—.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Honda CR-V if: You want the lower entry price, prioritise performance, need more boot space, need stronger towing, or prefer Honda's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Audi Q2 if: You want lower running costs, or prefer Audi's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Honda CR-V takes 5 of 6 key spec categories and comes in at a lower price. The Audi Q2 will save you roughly $171 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Honda CR-V has a clear edge. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Honda CR-V and Audi Q2?

The Honda CR-V is the cheapest at $39,900 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Audi Q2 by $9,500.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Audi Q2 uses the least fuel at 6.1L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched — Honda CR-V all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which has the most boot space?

The Honda CR-V has the largest boot at 561L.

Which can tow the most?

The Honda CR-V has the highest braked towing capacity at 1,500kg.

Which is the most powerful?

The Honda CR-V makes the most power at 140kW. The Honda CR-V is quickest to 100km/h in 8.2s.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs