CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsAlfa Romeo Junior vs GAC Aion UT
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Alfa Romeo Junior vs GAC Aion UT

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular Hatchbacks compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecAlfa RomeoGAC
Price (RRP)$45,900$31,990
Range (WLTP)430km
Battery60 kWh
Power107kW150kW
0-100 km/h8.9s7.3s
Max DC Charge87kW
10-80% Charge Time24 min
Fuel Economy4.1 L/100km
Boot Space270L321L
Towing1,200kg
Warranty5yr / 150k km8yr / 150k km
ANCAP Safety5 Stars5 Stars
V2LNoYes

Price Breakdown

The Alfa Romeo Junior starts from $45,900 before on-road costs, while the GAC Aion UT opens at $31,990. That makes the GAC Aion UT the more affordable entry point by $13,910.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $50,490 and $35,189 respectively.

The GAC Aion UT qualifies for FBT exemption as an electric vehicle, which can dramatically reduce the effective cost for novated lease buyers. The Alfa Romeo Junior, as a petrol model, does not qualify.

Safety Rundown

Both the Alfa Romeo Junior and GAC Aion UT hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating.

Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. The GAC Aion UT packs more ADAS features with 8 out of 10 key systems fitted, compared to 7 in the Alfa Romeo Junior.

Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, lane keep assist, adaptive cruise control, a reversing camera. Airbag count is 6 in the Alfa Romeo Junior and 7 in the GAC Aion UT.

Feature Showdown

The Alfa Romeo Junior features a 10.3-inch touchscreen paired with a 10.3-inch digital dash, while the GAC Aion UT gets a 14.6-inch display and 8.8-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The Alfa Romeo Junior stands out with wireless charging, power tailgate and ambient lighting that you will not find on the GAC Aion UT. The GAC Aion UT counters with V2L. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Interior trim differs: the Alfa Romeo Junior gets cloth upholstery while the GAC Aion UT offers pvc. Climate control is 1-zone in the Alfa Romeo Junior and 2-zone in the GAC Aion UT.

Drivetrain

The Alfa Romeo Junior uses a Petrol MHEV producing 107kW and 230Nm of torque, sent through a dct to a FWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 8.9 seconds.

The GAC Aion UT responds with a Electric making 150kW and 210Nm, paired to a automatic driving the front wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 7.3 seconds.

The GAC Aion UT has the clear power advantage at 150kW vs 107kW. In the real-world sprint, the GAC Aion UT is 1.6s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Alfa Romeo Junior measures 4,170mm long on a 2,560mm wheelbase, 100mm shorter than the GAC Aion UT at 4,270mm (2,750mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the GAC Aion UT generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 270L in the Alfa Romeo Junior and 321L in the GAC Aion UT, giving the GAC Aion UT a 51L advantage.

0

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

10.8m to 11.2m

Alfa Romeo Junior Ibrida
10.8mTighter
Best
GAC Aion UT Premium
11.2m
Worst
Alfa Romeo Junior
10.8m · Good

Based on 10.8m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
GAC Aion UT
11.2m · Average

Based on 11.2m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large

True Cost to Own

Running cost data is not yet available for both models. We will update when figures are confirmed.

Warranty: 5 years / 150,000km (Alfa Romeo Junior) vs 8 years / 150,000km (GAC Aion UT). The GAC Aion UT has longer coverage.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Alfa Romeo Junior if: You or prefer Alfa Romeo's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the GAC Aion UT if: You want the lower entry price, prioritise performance, need more boot space, value a longer warranty, or prefer GAC's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The GAC Aion UT takes 6 of 7 key spec categories and comes in at a lower price. If boot space matters, the GAC Aion UT has a clear edge. The GAC Aion UT adds peace of mind with a longer 8-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Alfa Romeo Junior and GAC Aion UT?

The GAC Aion UT is the cheapest at $31,990 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Alfa Romeo Junior by $13,910.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Alfa Romeo Junior uses the least fuel at 4.1L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched — Alfa Romeo Junior and GAC Aion UT all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which has the most boot space?

The GAC Aion UT has the largest boot at 321L.

Which can tow the most?

The Alfa Romeo Junior has the highest braked towing capacity at 1,200kg.

Which has the best warranty?

The GAC Aion UT has the longest warranty at 8 years / 150k km.

Which is the most powerful?

The GAC Aion UT makes the most power at 150kW. The GAC Aion UT is quickest to 100km/h in 7.3s.

Get ahead of your next car

Join free for new-car launches, news, reviews and buying guides. The independent take on what's new in Australia and what's actually worth buying, no dealer spin. Plus early access and founding-member pricing on the upcoming CarSorted Pro Report. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.

By subscribing, you agree to receive marketing emails. You can unsubscribe at any time. View our Privacy Policy.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All Hatchbacks