Aston Martin Valhalla vs BMW M2
A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular Coupes compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.
Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.
Aston Martin Valhalla
Price TBC
Coupe
Plug-in Hybrid
Twin-turbo petrol plug-in hybrid
794kW
10.5 kWh/100km
ANCAP: no data
—
BMW M2
From $123,900
Coupe
Petrol
Petrol
353kW
9.6 L/100km
ANCAP: no data
390L
Aston Martin Valhalla: we're still completing price, length, width, height and wheelbase, plus 8 others.
A blank cell below means we don't have that figure, not that the car scores badly on it. We leave them empty rather than estimate, so any row where one car is blank isn't a like-for-like comparison yet.
Plug-in hybrid fuel economy is shown as a hybrid (battery depleted) so it compares fairly with the other car. A PHEV's official "combined" figure assumes you start every trip fully charged, so real-world economy depends on how often you plug in. Electric range shows how far it goes before the petrol engine is needed.
Track the Aston Martin Valhalla & BMW M2
Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.
Price Breakdown
Pricing for one or both models is yet to be confirmed for the Australian market. We will update this comparison when official RRPs are announced.
Safety Rundown
ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.
Charging Times
How long each takes to charge, from a household power point to ultra-rapid DC, estimated from battery size and max charge rates.
How long to charge
6.1kWh usableEstimates from usable battery size and the car's max charge rates (7.4kW AC). Real times vary with temperature, starting charge, charger output and the charging curve.
Feature Showdown
The Aston Martin Valhalla features a 10.3-inch touchscreen paired with a 10.3-inch digital dash, while the BMW M2 gets a 12.3-inch display and 12.3-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.
The Aston Martin Valhalla stands out with Apple CarPlay that you will not find on the BMW M2. The BMW M2 counters with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto, head-up display, heated front seats and Harman Kardon audio. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.
Drivetrain
The Aston Martin Valhalla uses a Twin-turbo petrol plug-in hybrid producing 794kW, sent through a automatic to a AWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 2.5 seconds.
The BMW M2 responds with a Petrol making 353kW and 600Nm, paired to a auto driving the rear wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 4.2 seconds.
The Aston Martin Valhalla has the clear power advantage at 794kW vs 353kW. In the real-world sprint, the Aston Martin Valhalla is 1.7s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.
Space & Comfort
Turning Circle
Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.
11.0m diameter
Good
Based on 11.0m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Turning circle ratings
Interactive simulator: U-turns, parking & towing
Turning Circle
Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns are easier in tight carparks and U-turns.
Good
Needs a 3-point turn (one reverse)
Needs about 9.6 m to swing round without stopping. Road is 9.0 m.
U-turn on a wide street
≥ 10 m: clears in one
U-turn on a standard street
7 m: 3-point turn
Standard parking bay
1.9 m wide: fits with room
Tight carpark aisle
6 m: swings in
Narrow laneway
3.5 m: no room to turn
Turning circle ratings
Standard widths: AU local streets carry ~5.5–7 m of carriageway; main roads ~9–12 m. AS 2890.1 carpark aisles are ~5.8–6.6 m for 90° bays (2.6 m wide × 5.4 m deep).
Road, aisle, swing and off-tracking figures are indicative estimates from the published turning circle. Verify in person before relying on them.
True Cost to Own
Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $504/year for the Aston Martin Valhalla and $2,736/year for the BMW M2. That is a $2,232 annual difference in favour of the Aston Martin Valhalla.
Estimated annual total: $504 (Aston Martin Valhalla) vs $2,736 (BMW M2). The Aston Martin Valhalla saves you roughly $2,232 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.
Who Should Buy Which?
Buy the Aston Martin Valhalla if: You prioritise performance, want lower running costs, or prefer Aston Martin's approach to design and ownership experience.
Buy the BMW M2 if: You or prefer BMW's approach to design and ownership experience.
The Verdict
The Aston Martin Valhalla takes 2 of 3 key spec categories. The Aston Martin Valhalla will save you roughly $2,232 a year in fuel. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.
Common questions
Which is cheapest, Aston Martin Valhalla and BMW M2?
The BMW M2 is the cheapest at $123,900 before on-road costs.
Which is the most fuel-efficient?
The BMW M2 uses the least fuel at 9.6L/100km on the combined cycle.
What are the ANCAP safety ratings?
None of Aston Martin Valhalla and BMW M2 carry a published ANCAP rating yet — check back as they are tested.
Which can tow the most?
The BMW M2 has the highest braked towing capacity at 1,000kg.
Which is the most powerful?
The Aston Martin Valhalla makes the most power at 794kW. The Aston Martin Valhalla is quickest to 100km/h in 2.5s.
Track the cars you're comparing
Get price-drop and spec-change alerts on the models in this comparison, plus our weekly new-car rundown of launches, deals and reviews.
- Price-drop alerts on these models
- Spec-change alerts
- Weekly new-car rundown
No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.
Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.
Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026
Comments (0)
Sign in to join the conversation
No comments yet. Be the first!
