CS
CarSorted
Home›Comparisons›Audi RS3 vs BMW 3 Series
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Audi RS3 vs BMW 3 Series

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular Sedans compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

Data checked: specs 29 Aug 2026, price 24 Jun 2026

Driver assistance, as the manufacturer lists it

Swipe across. Tap a feature to see what it does and each car's source.

StandardOptional: printed price, +pack or NCO (no-cost)No, not offeredNo dataCounts beside each car use the same colours; ? is no option data.

Car
Audi RS3Sedan11?01
BMW 3 Series330i Sedan10?02

From each manufacturer's Australian equipment list. No data means that car's document does not say. The drawings are our own illustrations of how each kind of system works.

SpecAudiBMW
Price (RRP)$101,515$94,700
Equipped to matchEach car with the other's standard kit

$101,515RRP

  • with the BMW 3 Series's standard kit: $101,515 (nothing to add)

$94,700RRP

  • no option data for this car

Printed option prices only. A pack is counted once and makes the figure a floor when it carries no printed price. Nothing is inferred from the other car.

Fuel typePetrolPetrol
Power294kW190kW
0-100 km/h3.8s5.8s
Fuel Economy8.2 L/100km6.5 L/100km
Boot (seats up)321L480L
Towing1,900kg1,600kg
Warranty5yr / Unlimited5yr / Unlimited
ANCAP SafetyNo dataNo data

Track the Audi RS3 & BMW 3 Series

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

The Audi RS3 starts from $101,515 before on-road costs, while the BMW 3 Series opens at $94,700. That makes the BMW 3 Series the more affordable entry point by $6,815.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $111,667 and $104,170 respectively.

Over 5 years, the running costs favour the BMW 3 Series by roughly $2,420 in fuel alone.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Recalls on our record

Audi RS3

None open on our record

BMW 3 Series

  • REC-006668 · published 16 Jul 2026Due to a manufacturing defect, the starter motor solenoid switch can experience increased wear that could cause an internal short circuit.Year range on the notice: 2020 - 2025
  • REC-006667 · published 16 Jul 2026Due to a manufacturing defect, moisture may be able to enter the starter motor causing corrosion and result in the engine not starting.Year range on the notice: 2015 - 2020
  • REC-006553 · published 4 Mar 2026Due to a manufacturing defect, the Exhaust Gas Recirculation (EGR) cooler may develop an internal coolant leak.Year range on the notice: 2010 - 2022
  • 6 more on the model page.

A recall covers the builds its notice lists, not every car of a model. Check your VIN at vehiclerecalls.gov.au.

Feature Showdown

The Audi RS3 features a 10.1-inch touchscreen paired with a 12.3-inch digital dash, while the BMW 3 Series gets a 14.9-inch display and 12.3-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The Audi RS3 stands out with head-up display, heated front seats, Sonos 3D Premium audio and ambient lighting — features our data doesn't list for the BMW 3 Series. The BMW 3 Series counters with Harman Kardon audio. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Interior trim differs: the Audi RS3 gets nappa leather upholstery while the BMW 3 Series offers sensatec synthetic leather.

Drivetrain

The Audi RS3 uses a 5-cylinder petrol with direct fuel injection, turbocharging producing 294kW and 500Nm of torque, sent through a 7-speed s tronic to a AWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 3.8 seconds.

The BMW 3 Series responds with a Petrol making 190kW and 400Nm, paired to a auto driving the rear wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 5.8 seconds.

The Audi RS3 has the clear power advantage at 294kW vs 190kW. In the 0-100 sprint (manufacturer-claimed), the Audi RS3 is 2.0s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Audi RS3 measures 4,548mm long on a 2,630mm wheelbase, 165mm shorter than the BMW 3 Series at 4,713mm (2,851mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the BMW 3 Series generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 321L in the Audi RS3 and 480L in the BMW 3 Series, giving the BMW 3 Series a 159L advantage.

For towing, the Audi RS3 leads with a 1,900kg braked capacity vs 1,600kg. That 300kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

11.0m to 11.1m

TightestBMW 3 Series 330i SedanTightest turn at 11.0m, easiest U-turns and carparks
BMW 3 Series 330i Sedan
11.0mTighter
Best
Audi RS3 Sedan
11.1m
Worst
Audi RS3 Sedan
11.1m · Average

Based on 11.1m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
BMW 3 Series 330i Sedan
11.0m · Good

Based on 11.0m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Compare U-turns side by side

Turning Circle · U-turn compare

kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars
Tap to add/remove
TightestBMW 3 SeriesTightest turn at 11.0m, needs the least road to swing around
Audi RS311.1 m
Average△ 3-point
BMW 3 SeriesTightest11.0 m
Good△ 3-point
Scrub the turn

0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep

Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $2,337/year for the Audi RS3 and $1,853/year for the BMW 3 Series. That is a $484 annual difference in favour of the BMW 3 Series.

Warranty: 5 years / 999,999km (Audi RS3) vs 5 years / 999,999km (BMW 3 Series). Both match on warranty length.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Audi RS3 if: You prioritise performance, need stronger towing, or prefer Audi's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the BMW 3 Series if: You want the lower entry price, need more boot space, want lower running costs, or prefer BMW's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

BMW 3 Series: Top CarSorted Score, 68 vs 65

The BMW 3 Series comes out ahead on the CarSorted Score (68 vs 65), taking 3 of 6 key spec rows below and coming in at a lower price. The deciding gaps: performance (Audi RS3 ahead by 21), fuel economy (BMW 3 Series ahead by 15), value (BMW 3 Series ahead by 6). The BMW 3 Series will save you roughly $484 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the BMW 3 Series has a clear edge. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Audi RS3 and BMW 3 Series?

The BMW 3 Series is the cheapest at $94,700 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Audi RS3 by $6,815.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The BMW 3 Series uses the least fuel at 6.5L/100km on the combined cycle.

What are the ANCAP safety ratings?

None of Audi RS3 and BMW 3 Series carry a published ANCAP rating yet, so there is no crash result to compare. Check back as they are tested.

Which has the most boot space?

The BMW 3 Series has the largest boot at 480L with the seats up.

Which can tow the most?

The Audi RS3 has the highest braked towing capacity at 1,900kg.

Which is the most powerful?

The Audi RS3 makes the most power at 294kW. The Audi RS3 is quickest to 100km/h in 3.8s.

Free newsletter

Stay across the market

Get our weekly new-car rundown of launches, price moves, deals and reviews, straight from the data.

  • Weekly new-car rundown
  • Price cuts and new deals
  • New launches and reviews

No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All Sedans · Best family cars