CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsAudi RS3 vs BMW 3 Series
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Audi RS3 vs BMW 3 Series

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular Sedans compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecAudiBMW
Price (RRP)$101,515$94,700
Power294kW190kW
0-100 km/h3.8s6s
Fuel Economy8.2 L/100km7.1 L/100km
Boot Space321L480L
Towing1,900kg1,800kg
Warranty5yr / 999.999k km5yr / 999.999k km
ANCAP Safety5 Stars5 Stars

Price Breakdown

The Audi RS3 starts from $101,515 before on-road costs, while the BMW 3 Series opens at $94,700. That makes the BMW 3 Series the more affordable entry point by $6,815.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $111,667 and $104,170 respectively.

Over 5 years, the running costs favour the BMW 3 Series by roughly $1,565 in fuel alone.

Safety Rundown

Both the Audi RS3 and BMW 3 Series hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating. Adult occupant protection scored 89% for the Audi RS3 and 97% for the BMW 3 Series.

Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. The Audi RS3 packs more ADAS features with 9 out of 10 key systems fitted, compared to 6 in the BMW 3 Series.

Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, lane keep assist, adaptive cruise control, a reversing camera. Airbag count is 6 in the Audi RS3 and 6 in the BMW 3 Series. The Audi RS3 adds a 360-degree camera that the BMW 3 Series misses.

Feature Showdown

The Audi RS3 features a 10.1-inch touchscreen paired with a 12.3-inch digital dash, while the BMW 3 Series gets a 14.9-inch display and 12.3-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The Audi RS3 stands out with head-up display, heated front seats, Sonos 3D Premium audio and ambient lighting that you will not find on the BMW 3 Series. The BMW 3 Series counters with Harman Kardon audio. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Interior trim differs: the Audi RS3 gets nappa leather upholstery while the BMW 3 Series offers sensatec synthetic leather.

Drivetrain

The Audi RS3 uses a 5-cylinder petrol with direct fuel injection, turbocharging producing 294kW and 500Nm of torque, sent through a 7-speed s tronic to a AWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 3.8 seconds.

The BMW 3 Series responds with a Petrol making 190kW and 400Nm, paired to a auto driving the rear wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 6 seconds.

The Audi RS3 has the clear power advantage at 294kW vs 190kW. In the real-world sprint, the Audi RS3 is 2.2s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Audi RS3 measures 4,548mm long on a 2,630mm wheelbase, 161mm shorter than the BMW 3 Series at 4,709mm (2,851mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the BMW 3 Series generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 321L in the Audi RS3 and 480L in the BMW 3 Series, giving the BMW 3 Series a 159L advantage.

For towing, the Audi RS3 leads with a 1,900kg braked capacity vs 1,800kg. That 100kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

11.0m to 11.1m

BMW 3 Series 330i Sedan
11.0mTighter
Best
Audi RS3 Sedan
11.1m
Worst
Audi RS3
11.1m · Average

Based on 11.1m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
BMW 3 Series
11.0m · Good

Based on 11.0m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $2,337/year for the Audi RS3 and $2,024/year for the BMW 3 Series. That is a $313 annual difference in favour of the BMW 3 Series.

Estimated annual total: $2,337 (Audi RS3) vs $2,024 (BMW 3 Series). The BMW 3 Series saves you roughly $313 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 5 years / 999,999km (Audi RS3) vs 5 years / 999,999km (BMW 3 Series). Both match on warranty length.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Audi RS3 if: You prioritise performance, need stronger towing, or prefer Audi's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the BMW 3 Series if: You want the lower entry price, need more boot space, want lower running costs, or prefer BMW's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

This is genuinely close. The Audi RS3 and BMW 3 Series trade blows across the spec sheet, and neither runs away with an outright win. The BMW 3 Series will save you roughly $313 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the BMW 3 Series has a clear edge. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Audi RS3 and BMW 3 Series?

The BMW 3 Series is the cheapest at $94,700 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Audi RS3 by $6,815.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The BMW 3 Series uses the least fuel at 7.1L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched — Audi RS3 and BMW 3 Series all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which has the most boot space?

The BMW 3 Series has the largest boot at 480L.

Which can tow the most?

The Audi RS3 has the highest braked towing capacity at 1,900kg.

Which is the most powerful?

The Audi RS3 makes the most power at 294kW. The Audi RS3 is quickest to 100km/h in 3.8s.

Get ahead of your next car

Join free for new-car launches, news, reviews and buying guides. The independent take on what's new in Australia and what's actually worth buying, no dealer spin. Plus early access and founding-member pricing on the upcoming CarSorted Pro Report. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.

By subscribing, you agree to receive marketing emails. You can unsubscribe at any time. View our Privacy Policy.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All Sedans