CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsBMW 5 Series vs Suzuki Kizashi
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

BMW 5 Series vs Suzuki Kizashi

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular Sedans compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecBMWSuzuki
Price (RRP)$114,900TBC
Fuel typePetrolPetrol
Power140kW131kW
0-100 km/h5.6s
Fuel Economy6.8 L/100km7.9 L/100km
Boot Space520L461L
Towing2,000kg1,700kg
Warranty5yr / Unlimited3yr / 100k km
ANCAP Safety5 Stars5 Stars

Track the BMW 5 Series & Suzuki Kizashi

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

Pricing for one or both models is yet to be confirmed for the Australian market. We will update this comparison when official RRPs are announced.

Safety Rundown

Both the BMW 5 Series and Suzuki Kizashi hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating.

Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. We can confirm 6 of 10 key ADAS systems on the BMW 5 Series, against 0 on the Suzuki Kizashi.

Both include the essentials: core safety systems. Airbag count is 6 in the BMW 5 Series and 6 in the Suzuki Kizashi.

Feature Showdown

Both come with modern infotainment systems.

The BMW 5 Series stands out with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto, head-up display, wireless charging, panoramic roof, heated front seats, power tailgate and Harman Kardon audio — features our data doesn't list for the Suzuki Kizashi. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Interior trim differs: the BMW 5 Series gets sensatec synthetic leather upholstery while the Suzuki Kizashi offers fabric.

Drivetrain

The BMW 5 Series uses a Petrol producing 140kW and 310Nm of torque, sent through a auto to a RWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 5.6 seconds.

The Suzuki Kizashi responds with a 2.4L J24B petrol, DOHC 16v with variable valve timing, multipoint injection making 131kW and 230Nm, paired to a 6-speed manual driving the front wheels.

The BMW 5 Series has the clear power advantage at 140kW vs 131kW. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The BMW 5 Series measures 5,060mm long on a 2,995mm wheelbase, 410mm longer than the Suzuki Kizashi at 4,650mm (2,700mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the BMW 5 Series generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 520L in the BMW 5 Series and 461L in the Suzuki Kizashi, giving the BMW 5 Series a 59L advantage.

For towing, the BMW 5 Series leads with a 2,000kg braked capacity vs 1,700kg. That 300kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

11.0m to 11.9m

TightestSuzuki Kizashi XL 2.4 6MTTightest turn at 11.0m, easiest U-turns and carparks
Suzuki Kizashi XL 2.4 6MT
11.0mTighter
Best
BMW 5 Series 520i Sedan
11.9m
Worst
BMW 5 Series 520i Sedan
11.9m · Average

Based on 11.9m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Suzuki Kizashi XL 2.4 6MT
11.0m · Good

Based on 11.0m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Compare U-turns side by side

Turning Circle · U-turn compare

kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars
Tap to add/remove
TightestSuzuki KizashiTightest turn at 11.0m, needs the least road to swing around
BMW 5 Series11.9 m
Average△ 3-point
Suzuki KizashiTightest11.0 m
Good△ 3-point
Scrub the turn

0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep

Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $1,938/year for the BMW 5 Series and $2,252/year for the Suzuki Kizashi. That is a $314 annual difference in favour of the BMW 5 Series.

Warranty: 5 years / 999,999km (BMW 5 Series) vs 3 years / 100,000km (Suzuki Kizashi). The BMW 5 Series has longer coverage.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the BMW 5 Series if: You prioritise performance, need more boot space, want lower running costs, value a longer warranty, need stronger towing, or prefer BMW's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Suzuki Kizashi if: You or prefer Suzuki's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The BMW 5 Series takes 5 of 5 key spec categories. The BMW 5 Series will save you roughly $314 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the BMW 5 Series has a clear edge. The BMW 5 Series adds peace of mind with a longer 5-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, BMW 5 Series and Suzuki Kizashi?

The BMW 5 Series is the cheapest at $114,900 before on-road costs.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The BMW 5 Series uses the least fuel at 6.8L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched on crash rating: BMW 5 Series and Suzuki Kizashi all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which has the most boot space?

The BMW 5 Series has the largest boot at 520L.

Which can tow the most?

The BMW 5 Series has the highest braked towing capacity at 2,000kg.

Which has the best warranty?

The BMW 5 Series has the longest warranty at 5 years / Unlimited.

Which is the most powerful?

The BMW 5 Series makes the most power at 140kW.

Free newsletter

Stay across the market

Get our weekly new-car rundown of launches, price moves, deals and reviews, straight from the data.

  • Weekly new-car rundown
  • Price cuts and new deals
  • New launches and reviews

No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All Sedans · Best family cars