CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsHyundai i30 Sedan vs Suzuki Kizashi
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Hyundai i30 Sedan vs Suzuki Kizashi

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular Sedans compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecHyundaiSuzuki
Price (RRP)$29,250TBC
Fuel typePetrolPetrol
Power110kW131kW
Fuel Economy6.1 L/100km7.9 L/100km
Boot Space474L461L
Towing1,100kg1,700kg
Warranty5yr / Unlimited3yr / 100k km
ANCAP Safety3 Stars5 Stars

Track the Hyundai i30 Sedan & Suzuki Kizashi

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

Pricing for one or both models is yet to be confirmed for the Australian market. We will update this comparison when official RRPs are announced.

Safety Rundown

The Suzuki Kizashi holds a 5-star ANCAP rating vs 3 stars for the Hyundai i30 Sedan.

Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. The Hyundai i30 Sedan packs more ADAS features with 4 out of 10 key systems fitted, compared to 0 in the Suzuki Kizashi.

Both include the essentials: core safety systems.

Feature Showdown

Both come with modern infotainment systems.

The Hyundai i30 Sedan stands out with Apple CarPlay that you will not find on the Suzuki Kizashi. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Drivetrain

The Hyundai i30 Sedan uses a Petrol producing 110kW and 180Nm of torque, sent through a cvt to a FWD layout.

The Suzuki Kizashi responds with a 2.4L J24B petrol, DOHC 16v with variable valve timing, multipoint injection making 131kW and 230Nm, paired to a cvt automatic driving the front wheels.

The Suzuki Kizashi has the clear power advantage at 131kW vs 110kW. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Hyundai i30 Sedan measures 4,710mm long on a 2,720mm wheelbase, 60mm longer than the Suzuki Kizashi at 4,650mm (2,700mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Hyundai i30 Sedan generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 474L in the Hyundai i30 Sedan and 461L in the Suzuki Kizashi, giving the Hyundai i30 Sedan a 13L advantage.

For towing, the Suzuki Kizashi leads with a 1,700kg braked capacity vs 1,100kg. That 600kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

10.8m to 11.0m

TightestHyundai i30 Sedan ActiveTightest turn at 10.8m, easiest U-turns and carparks
Hyundai i30 Sedan Active
10.8mTighter
Best
Suzuki Kizashi XL 2.4 CVT
11.0m
Worst
Hyundai i30 Sedan Active
10.8m · Good

Based on 10.8m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Suzuki Kizashi XL 2.4 CVT
11.0m · Good

Based on 11.0m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Compare U-turns side by side

Turning Circle · U-turn compare

kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars
Tap to add/remove
TightestHyundai i30 SedanTightest turn at 10.8m, needs the least road to swing around
Hyundai i30 SedanTightest10.8 m
Good△ 3-point
Suzuki Kizashi11.0 m
Good△ 3-point
Scrub the turn

0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep

Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $1,739/year for the Hyundai i30 Sedan and $2,252/year for the Suzuki Kizashi. That is a $513 annual difference in favour of the Hyundai i30 Sedan.

Estimated annual total: $1,739 (Hyundai i30 Sedan) vs $2,252 (Suzuki Kizashi). The Hyundai i30 Sedan saves you roughly $513 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 5 years / 999,999km (Hyundai i30 Sedan) vs 3 years / 100,000km (Suzuki Kizashi). The Hyundai i30 Sedan has longer coverage.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Hyundai i30 Sedan if: You need more boot space, want lower running costs, value a longer warranty, or prefer Hyundai's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Suzuki Kizashi if: You prioritise performance, need stronger towing, or prefer Suzuki's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

This is genuinely close. The Hyundai i30 Sedan and Suzuki Kizashi trade blows across the spec sheet, and neither runs away with an outright win. The Hyundai i30 Sedan will save you roughly $513 a year in fuel. The Hyundai i30 Sedan adds peace of mind with a longer 5-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Hyundai i30 Sedan and Suzuki Kizashi?

The Hyundai i30 Sedan is the cheapest at $29,250 before on-road costs.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Hyundai i30 Sedan uses the least fuel at 6.1L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

The Suzuki Kizashi has the highest ANCAP rating at 5 stars.

Which has the most boot space?

The Hyundai i30 Sedan has the largest boot at 474L.

Which can tow the most?

The Suzuki Kizashi has the highest braked towing capacity at 1,700kg.

Which has the best warranty?

The Hyundai i30 Sedan has the longest warranty at 5 years / Unlimited.

Which is the most powerful?

The Suzuki Kizashi makes the most power at 131kW.

Free alerts

Track the cars you're comparing

Get price-drop and spec-change alerts on the models in this comparison, plus our weekly new-car rundown of launches, deals and reviews.

  • Price-drop alerts on these models
  • Spec-change alerts
  • Weekly new-car rundown

No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All Sedans · Best family cars