CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsSuzuki Kizashi vs Toyota Camry
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Suzuki Kizashi vs Toyota Camry

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular Sedans compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecSuzukiToyota
Price (RRP)TBC$39,990
Fuel typePetrolHybrid
Power131kW170kW
0-100 km/h8.1s
Fuel Economy7.9 L/100km4 L/100km
Boot Space461L524L
Towing1,700kg1,200kg
Warranty3yr / 100k km5yr / Unlimited
ANCAP Safety5 Stars5 Stars

Track the Suzuki Kizashi & Toyota Camry

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

Pricing for one or both models is yet to be confirmed for the Australian market. We will update this comparison when official RRPs are announced.

Safety Rundown

Both the Suzuki Kizashi and Toyota Camry hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating.

Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. The Toyota Camry packs more ADAS features with 7 out of 10 key systems fitted, compared to 0 in the Suzuki Kizashi.

Both include the essentials: core safety systems.

Feature Showdown

Both come with modern infotainment systems.

The Toyota Camry counters with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto that the Suzuki Kizashi does not offer. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Drivetrain

The Suzuki Kizashi uses a 2.4L J24B petrol, DOHC 16v with variable valve timing, multipoint injection producing 131kW and 230Nm of torque, sent through a cvt automatic to a FWD layout.

The Toyota Camry responds with a 2.5L 4-cyl Dual VVT-i Hybrid making 170kW and 221Nm, paired to a cvt driving the front wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 8.1 seconds.

The Toyota Camry has the clear power advantage at 170kW vs 131kW. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Suzuki Kizashi measures 4,650mm long on a 2,700mm wheelbase, 270mm shorter than the Toyota Camry at 4,920mm (2,825mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Toyota Camry generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 461L in the Suzuki Kizashi and 524L in the Toyota Camry, giving the Toyota Camry a 63L advantage.

For towing, the Suzuki Kizashi leads with a 1,700kg braked capacity vs 1,200kg. That 500kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

11.0m to 11.2m

TightestSuzuki Kizashi XL 2.4 CVTTightest turn at 11.0m, easiest U-turns and carparks
Suzuki Kizashi XL 2.4 CVT
11.0mTighter
Best
Toyota Camry Ascent Hybrid
11.2m
Worst
Suzuki Kizashi XL 2.4 CVT
11.0m · Good

Based on 11.0m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Toyota Camry Ascent Hybrid
11.2m · Average

Based on 11.2m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Compare U-turns side by side

Turning Circle · U-turn compare

kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars
Tap to add/remove
TightestSuzuki KizashiTightest turn at 11.0m, needs the least road to swing around
Suzuki KizashiTightest11.0 m
Good△ 3-point
Toyota Camry11.2 m
Average△ 3-point
Scrub the turn

0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep

Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $2,252/year for the Suzuki Kizashi and $1,140/year for the Toyota Camry. That is a $1,112 annual difference in favour of the Toyota Camry.

Estimated annual total: $2,252 (Suzuki Kizashi) vs $1,140 (Toyota Camry). The Toyota Camry saves you roughly $1,112 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 3 years / 100,000km (Suzuki Kizashi) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Toyota Camry). The Toyota Camry has longer coverage.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Suzuki Kizashi if: You need stronger towing, or prefer Suzuki's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Toyota Camry if: You prioritise performance, need more boot space, want lower running costs, value a longer warranty, or prefer Toyota's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Toyota Camry takes 4 of 5 key spec categories. The Toyota Camry will save you roughly $1,112 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Toyota Camry has a clear edge. The Toyota Camry adds peace of mind with a longer 5-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Suzuki Kizashi and Toyota Camry?

The Toyota Camry is the cheapest at $39,990 before on-road costs.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Toyota Camry uses the least fuel at 4L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched — Suzuki Kizashi and Toyota Camry all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which has the most boot space?

The Toyota Camry has the largest boot at 524L.

Which can tow the most?

The Suzuki Kizashi has the highest braked towing capacity at 1,700kg.

Which has the best warranty?

The Toyota Camry has the longest warranty at 5 years / Unlimited.

Which is the most powerful?

The Toyota Camry makes the most power at 170kW.

Free alerts

Track the cars you're comparing

Get price-drop and spec-change alerts on the models in this comparison, plus our weekly new-car rundown of launches, deals and reviews.

  • Price-drop alerts on these models
  • Spec-change alerts
  • Weekly new-car rundown

No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All Sedans · Best family cars · Best hybrid cars