CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsBMW 7 Series vs Ford Falcon
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

BMW 7 Series vs Ford Falcon

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular Sedans compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

Specifications in progress

Ford Falcon: we're still completing price, 0-100km/h and ground clearance.

A blank cell below means we don't have that figure, not that the car scores badly on it. We leave them empty rather than estimate, so any row where one car is blank isn't a like-for-like comparison yet.

SpecBMWFord
Price (RRP)$279,900TBC
Fuel typePetrolPetrol
Power280kW195kW
0-100 km/h5.4s
Fuel Economy7.9 L/100km9.9 L/100km
Boot Space540L535L
Towing2,000kg2,300kg
Warranty5yr / Unlimited3yr / 100k km
ANCAP SafetyNo data5 Stars

Track the BMW 7 Series & Ford Falcon

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

Pricing for one or both models is yet to be confirmed for the Australian market. We will update this comparison when official RRPs are announced.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Feature Showdown

Both come with modern infotainment systems.

The BMW 7 Series stands out with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto, head-up display, wireless charging, panoramic roof, heated front seats, ventilated seats, power tailgate, Harman Kardon audio and ambient lighting — features our data doesn't list for the Ford Falcon. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Interior trim differs: the BMW 7 Series gets vernasca leather upholstery while the Ford Falcon offers cloth. Climate control is 4-zone in the BMW 7 Series and 1-zone in the Ford Falcon.

Drivetrain

The BMW 7 Series uses a Petrol producing 280kW and 540Nm of torque, sent through a auto to a RWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 5.4 seconds.

The Ford Falcon responds with a petrol making 195kW and 391Nm, paired to a 6-speed automatic (zf) driving the rear wheels.

The BMW 7 Series has the clear power advantage at 280kW vs 195kW. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The BMW 7 Series measures 5,391mm long on a 3,215mm wheelbase, 436mm longer than the Ford Falcon at 4,955mm (2,838mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the BMW 7 Series generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 540L in the BMW 7 Series and 535L in the Ford Falcon, giving the BMW 7 Series a 5L advantage.

For towing, the Ford Falcon leads with a 2,300kg braked capacity vs 2,000kg. That 300kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

11.0m to 12.5m

TightestFord Falcon Falcon XTTightest turn at 11.0m, easiest U-turns and carparks
Ford Falcon Falcon XT
11.0mTighter
Best
BMW 7 Series 740i Sedan
12.5m
Worst
BMW 7 Series 740i Sedan
12.5m · Large

Based on 12.5m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Ford Falcon XT
11.0m · Good

Based on 11.0m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Compare U-turns side by side

Turning Circle · U-turn compare

kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars
Tap to add/remove
TightestFord FalconTightest turn at 11.0m, needs the least road to swing around
BMW 7 Series12.5 m
Large△ 3-point
Ford FalconTightest11.0 m
Good△ 3-point
Scrub the turn

0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep

Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $2,252/year for the BMW 7 Series and $2,822/year for the Ford Falcon. That is a $570 annual difference in favour of the BMW 7 Series.

Warranty: 5 years / 999,999km (BMW 7 Series) vs 3 years / 100,000km (Ford Falcon). The BMW 7 Series has longer coverage. Capped-price servicing: —6yr (Ford Falcon).

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the BMW 7 Series if: You prioritise performance, need more boot space, want lower running costs, value a longer warranty, or prefer BMW's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Ford Falcon if: You need stronger towing, or prefer Ford's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The BMW 7 Series takes 4 of 5 key spec categories. The BMW 7 Series will save you roughly $570 a year in fuel. The BMW 7 Series adds peace of mind with a longer 5-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, BMW 7 Series and Ford Falcon?

The BMW 7 Series is the cheapest at $279,900 before on-road costs.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The BMW 7 Series uses the least fuel at 7.9L/100km on the combined cycle.

What are the ANCAP safety ratings?

Ford Falcon holds a 5-star ANCAP rating. We have no published ANCAP rating for BMW 7 Series, so there is nothing to compare on crash performance. Compare the active-safety features above instead.

Which has the most boot space?

The BMW 7 Series has the largest boot at 540L.

Which can tow the most?

The Ford Falcon has the highest braked towing capacity at 2,300kg.

Which has the best warranty?

The BMW 7 Series has the longest warranty at 5 years / Unlimited.

Which is the most powerful?

The BMW 7 Series makes the most power at 280kW.

Free newsletter

Stay across the market

Get our weekly new-car rundown of launches, price moves, deals and reviews, straight from the data.

  • Weekly new-car rundown
  • Price cuts and new deals
  • New launches and reviews

No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All Sedans · Best family cars