CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsFord Falcon vs Subaru WRX
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Ford Falcon vs Subaru WRX

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular Sedans compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

Specifications in progress

Ford Falcon: we're still completing price, 0-100km/h and ground clearance.

A blank cell below means we don't have that figure, not that the car scores badly on it. We leave them empty rather than estimate, so any row where one car is blank isn't a like-for-like comparison yet.

SpecFordSubaru
Price (RRP)TBC$48,890
Fuel typePetrolPetrol
Power195kW202kW
0-100 km/h6.4s
Fuel Economy9.9 L/100km9.9 L/100km
Boot Space535L414L
Towing2,300kg
Warranty3yr / 100k km5yr / Unlimited
ANCAP Safety5 StarsNo data

Track the Ford Falcon & Subaru WRX

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

Pricing for one or both models is yet to be confirmed for the Australian market. We will update this comparison when official RRPs are announced.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Feature Showdown

Both come with modern infotainment systems.

The Subaru WRX counters with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto and Harman Kardon audio. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Drivetrain

The Ford Falcon uses a petrol producing 195kW and 391Nm of torque, sent through a 6-speed automatic (zf) to a RWD layout.

The Subaru WRX responds with a Petrol making 202kW and 350Nm, paired to a manual driving all four wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 6.4 seconds.

The Subaru WRX has the clear power advantage at 202kW vs 195kW. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Ford Falcon measures 4,955mm long on a 2,838mm wheelbase, 285mm longer than the Subaru WRX at 4,670mm (2,675mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Ford Falcon generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 535L in the Ford Falcon and 414L in the Subaru WRX, giving the Ford Falcon a 121L advantage.

0

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

11.0m to 11.2m

TightestFord Falcon Falcon XTTightest turn at 11.0m, easiest U-turns and carparks
Ford Falcon Falcon XT
11.0mTighter
Best
Subaru WRX AWD Sedan Manual
11.2m
Worst
Ford Falcon XT
11.0m · Good

Based on 11.0m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Subaru WRX AWD Sedan Manual
11.2m · Average

Based on 11.2m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Compare U-turns side by side

Turning Circle · U-turn compare

kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars
Tap to add/remove
TightestFord FalconTightest turn at 11.0m, needs the least road to swing around
Ford FalconTightest11.0 m
Good△ 3-point
Subaru WRX11.2 m
Average△ 3-point
Scrub the turn

0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep

Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $2,822/year for the Ford Falcon and $2,822/year for the Subaru WRX.

Warranty: 3 years / 100,000km (Ford Falcon) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Subaru WRX). The Subaru WRX has longer coverage. Capped-price servicing: 6yr (Ford Falcon)—.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Ford Falcon if: You need more boot space, or prefer Ford's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Subaru WRX if: You prioritise performance, value a longer warranty, or prefer Subaru's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

This is genuinely close. The Ford Falcon and Subaru WRX trade blows across the spec sheet, and neither runs away with an outright win. If boot space matters, the Ford Falcon has a clear edge. The Subaru WRX adds peace of mind with a longer 5-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Ford Falcon and Subaru WRX?

The Subaru WRX is the cheapest at $48,890 before on-road costs.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Ford Falcon uses the least fuel at 9.9L/100km on the combined cycle.

What are the ANCAP safety ratings?

Ford Falcon holds a 5-star ANCAP rating. We have no published ANCAP rating for Subaru WRX, so there is nothing to compare on crash performance. Compare the active-safety features above instead.

Which has the most boot space?

The Ford Falcon has the largest boot at 535L.

Which can tow the most?

The Ford Falcon has the highest braked towing capacity at 2,300kg.

Which has the best warranty?

The Subaru WRX has the longest warranty at 5 years / Unlimited.

Which is the most powerful?

The Subaru WRX makes the most power at 202kW.

Free newsletter

Stay across the market

Get our weekly new-car rundown of launches, price moves, deals and reviews, straight from the data.

  • Weekly new-car rundown
  • Price cuts and new deals
  • New launches and reviews

No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All Sedans · Best family cars