CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsFord Falcon vs Hyundai i30 Sedan
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Ford Falcon vs Hyundai i30 Sedan

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular Sedans compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

Specifications in progress

Ford Falcon: we're still completing price, 0-100km/h and ground clearance.

A blank cell below means we don't have that figure, not that the car scores badly on it. We leave them empty rather than estimate, so any row where one car is blank isn't a like-for-like comparison yet.

SpecFordHyundai
Price (RRP)TBC$29,250
Fuel typePetrolPetrol
Power195kW117kW
Fuel Economy9.9 L/100km7 L/100km
Boot Space535L474L
Towing2,300kg1,200kg
Warranty3yr / 100k km5yr / Unlimited
ANCAP Safety5 Stars3 Stars

Track the Ford Falcon & Hyundai i30 Sedan

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

Pricing for one or both models is yet to be confirmed for the Australian market. We will update this comparison when official RRPs are announced.

Safety Rundown

The Ford Falcon holds a 5-star ANCAP rating vs 3 stars for the Hyundai i30 Sedan.

Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. We can confirm 4 of 10 key ADAS systems on the Hyundai i30 Sedan, against 0 on the Ford Falcon.

Both include the essentials: core safety systems. Airbag count is 4 in the Ford Falcon and 6 in the Hyundai i30 Sedan.

Feature Showdown

Both come with modern infotainment systems.

The Hyundai i30 Sedan counters with Apple CarPlay. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Interior trim differs: the Ford Falcon gets cloth upholstery while the Hyundai i30 Sedan offers leather.

Drivetrain

The Ford Falcon uses a petrol producing 195kW and 391Nm of torque, sent through a 6-speed automatic (zf) to a RWD layout.

The Hyundai i30 Sedan responds with a Petrol making 117kW and 191Nm, paired to a 6-speed manual driving the front wheels.

The Ford Falcon has the clear power advantage at 195kW vs 117kW. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Ford Falcon measures 4,955mm long on a 2,838mm wheelbase, 245mm longer than the Hyundai i30 Sedan at 4,710mm (2,720mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Ford Falcon generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 535L in the Ford Falcon and 474L in the Hyundai i30 Sedan, giving the Ford Falcon a 61L advantage.

For towing, the Ford Falcon leads with a 2,300kg braked capacity vs 1,200kg. That 1,100kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

10.8m to 11.0m

TightestHyundai i30 Sedan ActiveTightest turn at 10.8m, easiest U-turns and carparks
Hyundai i30 Sedan Active
10.8mTighter
Best
Ford Falcon Falcon XT
11.0m
Worst
Ford Falcon XT
11.0m · Good

Based on 11.0m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Hyundai i30 Sedan Active
10.8m · Good

Based on 10.8m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Compare U-turns side by side

Turning Circle · U-turn compare

kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars
Tap to add/remove
TightestHyundai i30 SedanTightest turn at 10.8m, needs the least road to swing around
Ford Falcon11.0 m
Good△ 3-point
Hyundai i30 SedanTightest10.8 m
Good△ 3-point
Scrub the turn

0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep

Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $2,822/year for the Ford Falcon and $1,995/year for the Hyundai i30 Sedan. That is a $827 annual difference in favour of the Hyundai i30 Sedan.

Warranty: 3 years / 100,000km (Ford Falcon) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Hyundai i30 Sedan). The Hyundai i30 Sedan has longer coverage. Capped-price servicing: 6yr (Ford Falcon)—.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Ford Falcon if: You prioritise performance, need more boot space, need stronger towing, or prefer Ford's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Hyundai i30 Sedan if: You want lower running costs, value a longer warranty, or prefer Hyundai's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Ford Falcon takes 4 of 6 key spec categories. The Hyundai i30 Sedan will save you roughly $827 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Ford Falcon has a clear edge. The Hyundai i30 Sedan adds peace of mind with a longer 5-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Ford Falcon and Hyundai i30 Sedan?

The Hyundai i30 Sedan is the cheapest at $29,250 before on-road costs.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Hyundai i30 Sedan uses the least fuel at 7L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

The Ford Falcon has the highest ANCAP rating at 5 stars.

Which has the most boot space?

The Ford Falcon has the largest boot at 535L.

Which can tow the most?

The Ford Falcon has the highest braked towing capacity at 2,300kg.

Which has the best warranty?

The Hyundai i30 Sedan has the longest warranty at 5 years / Unlimited.

Which is the most powerful?

The Ford Falcon makes the most power at 195kW.

Free newsletter

Stay across the market

Get our weekly new-car rundown of launches, price moves, deals and reviews, straight from the data.

  • Weekly new-car rundown
  • Price cuts and new deals
  • New launches and reviews

No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All Sedans · Best family cars