BMW X3 vs Land Rover Range Rover Evoque
A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.
Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

BMW X3
From $86,100
SUV
Petrol
Petrol
140kW
7.5 L/100km
ANCAP: no data
570L
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque
From $83,600
SUV
Petrol
2.0L Ingenium 4-cylinder turbocharged petrol
184kW
8.3 L/100km
ANCAP: no data
472L
Track the BMW X3 & Land Rover Range Rover Evoque
Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.
Price Breakdown
The BMW X3 starts from $86,100 before on-road costs, while the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque opens at $83,600. That makes the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque the more affordable entry point by $2,500.
Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $94,710 and $91,960 respectively.
Over 5 years, the running costs favour the BMW X3 by roughly $1,140 in fuel alone.
Safety Rundown
ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.
Feature Showdown
The BMW X3 features a 14.9-inch touchscreen paired with a 12.3-inch digital dash, while the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque gets a 11.4-inch display and 12.3-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.
The BMW X3 stands out with Bowers & Wilkins audio that you will not find on the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque. The Land Rover Range Rover Evoque counters with head-up display, panoramic roof, heated front seats, power tailgate, Meridian audio and ambient lighting. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.
Interior trim differs: the BMW X3 gets merino leather upholstery while the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque offers grained leather. Climate control is 4-zone in the BMW X3 and 2-zone in the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque.
Drivetrain
The BMW X3 uses a Petrol producing 140kW and 310Nm of torque, sent through a auto to a AWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 8.5 seconds.
The Land Rover Range Rover Evoque responds with a 2.0L Ingenium 4-cylinder turbocharged petrol making 184kW and 365Nm, paired to a 9-speed automatic driving all four wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 7.6 seconds.
The Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has the clear power advantage at 184kW vs 140kW. In the real-world sprint, the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is 0.9s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.
Space & Comfort
The BMW X3 measures 4,755mm long on a 2,865mm wheelbase, 384mm longer than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque at 4,371mm (2,681mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the BMW X3 generally means more rear legroom.
Boot space is 570L in the BMW X3 and 472L in the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, giving the BMW X3 a 98L advantage.
For towing, the BMW X3 leads with a 2,400kg braked capacity vs 2,000kg. That 400kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.
Turning Circle
Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.
11.6m to 12.1m
Based on 12.1m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Based on 11.6m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Turning circle ratings
Compare U-turns side by side
Turning Circle · U-turn compare
kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep
Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.
Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.
True Cost to Own
Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $2,138/year for the BMW X3 and $2,366/year for the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque. That is a $228 annual difference in favour of the BMW X3.
Estimated annual total: $2,138 (BMW X3) vs $2,366 (Land Rover Range Rover Evoque). The BMW X3 saves you roughly $228 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.
Warranty: 5 years / 999,999km (BMW X3) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Land Rover Range Rover Evoque). Both match on warranty length.
Who Should Buy Which?
Buy the BMW X3 if: You need more boot space, want lower running costs, need stronger towing, or prefer BMW's approach to design and ownership experience.
Buy the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque if: You want the lower entry price, prioritise performance, or prefer Land Rover's approach to design and ownership experience.
The Verdict
This is genuinely close. The BMW X3 and Land Rover Range Rover Evoque trade blows across the spec sheet, and neither runs away with an outright win. The BMW X3 will save you roughly $228 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the BMW X3 has a clear edge. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.
Common questions
Which is cheapest, BMW X3 and Land Rover Range Rover Evoque?
The Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is the cheapest at $83,600 before on-road costs. That undercuts the BMW X3 by $2,500.
Which is the most fuel-efficient?
The BMW X3 uses the least fuel at 7.5L/100km on the combined cycle.
What are the ANCAP safety ratings?
None of BMW X3 and Land Rover Range Rover Evoque carry a published ANCAP rating yet — check back as they are tested.
Which has the most boot space?
The BMW X3 has the largest boot at 570L.
Which can tow the most?
The BMW X3 has the highest braked towing capacity at 2,400kg.
Which is the most powerful?
The Land Rover Range Rover Evoque makes the most power at 184kW. The Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is quickest to 100km/h in 7.6s.
Track the cars you're comparing
Sign up free for price-drop alerts on the models in this comparison, plus our weekly new-car rundown covering launches, deals and reviews. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.
By subscribing, you agree to receive marketing emails. You can unsubscribe at any time. View our Privacy Policy.
Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.
Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026
Comments (0)
Sign in to join the conversation
No comments yet. Be the first!








