CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsJeep Wrangler vs Land Rover Range Rover Evoque
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Jeep Wrangler vs Land Rover Range Rover Evoque

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecJeepLand Rover
Price (RRP)$81,990$83,600
Fuel typePetrolPetrol
Power200kW184kW
0-100 km/h9.3s7.6s
Fuel Economy10.2 L/100km8.3 L/100km
Boot Space365L472L
Towing1,497kg2,000kg
Warranty5yr / 100k km5yr / Unlimited
ANCAP SafetyNo dataNo data

Track the Jeep Wrangler & Land Rover Range Rover Evoque

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

The Jeep Wrangler starts from $81,990 before on-road costs, while the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque opens at $83,600. That makes the Jeep Wrangler the more affordable entry point by $1,610.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $90,189 and $91,960 respectively.

Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque by roughly $2,705 in fuel alone.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Feature Showdown

The Jeep Wrangler features a 8.4-inch touchscreen paired with a 7-inch digital dash, while the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque gets a 11.4-inch display and 12.3-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The Jeep Wrangler stands out with Alpine audio that you will not find on the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque. The Land Rover Range Rover Evoque counters with head-up display, wireless charging, panoramic roof, power tailgate and Meridian audio. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Interior trim differs: the Jeep Wrangler gets leather upholstery while the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque offers grained leather. Climate control is 1-zone in the Jeep Wrangler and 2-zone in the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque.

Drivetrain

The Jeep Wrangler uses a Petrol I4 Turbo producing 200kW and 400Nm of torque, sent through a 8-speed automatic to a 4WD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 9.3 seconds.

The Land Rover Range Rover Evoque responds with a 2.0L Ingenium 4-cylinder turbocharged petrol making 184kW and 365Nm, paired to a 9-speed automatic driving all four wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 7.6 seconds.

The Jeep Wrangler has the clear power advantage at 200kW vs 184kW. In the real-world sprint, the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is 1.7s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Jeep Wrangler measures 4,334mm long on a 2,459mm wheelbase, 37mm shorter than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque at 4,371mm (2,681mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 365L in the Jeep Wrangler and 472L in the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, giving the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque a 107L advantage. The Land Rover Range Rover Evoque seats 5 vs 4.

For towing, the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque leads with a 2,000kg braked capacity vs 1,497kg. That 503kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

10.0m to 11.6m

TightestJeep Wrangler Rubicon 2-DoorTightest turn at 10.0m, easiest U-turns and carparks
Jeep Wrangler Rubicon 2-Door
10.0mTighter
Best
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque Hoxton Edition P250
11.6m
Worst
Jeep Wrangler Rubicon 2-Door
10.0m · Good

Based on 10.0m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque Hoxton Edition P250
11.6m · Average

Based on 11.6m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Compare U-turns side by side

Turning Circle · U-turn compare

kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars
Tap to add/remove
TightestJeep WranglerTightest turn at 10.0m, needs the least road to swing around
Jeep WranglerTightest10.0 m
Good△ 3-point
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque11.6 m
Average△ 3-point
Scrub the turn

0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep

Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $2,907/year for the Jeep Wrangler and $2,366/year for the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque. That is a $541 annual difference in favour of the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque.

Estimated annual total: $2,907 (Jeep Wrangler) vs $2,366 (Land Rover Range Rover Evoque). The Land Rover Range Rover Evoque saves you roughly $541 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 5 years / 100,000km (Jeep Wrangler) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Land Rover Range Rover Evoque). Both match on warranty length. Capped-price servicing: 5yr (Jeep Wrangler)—.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Jeep Wrangler if: You want the lower entry price, prioritise performance, or prefer Jeep's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque if: You need more boot space, want lower running costs, need stronger towing, or prefer Land Rover's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Land Rover Range Rover Evoque takes 4 of 6 key spec categories. The Land Rover Range Rover Evoque will save you roughly $541 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has a clear edge. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Jeep Wrangler and Land Rover Range Rover Evoque?

The Jeep Wrangler is the cheapest at $81,990 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque by $1,610.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Land Rover Range Rover Evoque uses the least fuel at 8.3L/100km on the combined cycle.

What are the ANCAP safety ratings?

None of Jeep Wrangler and Land Rover Range Rover Evoque carry a published ANCAP rating yet — check back as they are tested.

Which has the most boot space?

The Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has the largest boot at 472L.

Which can tow the most?

The Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has the highest braked towing capacity at 2,000kg.

Which is the most powerful?

The Jeep Wrangler makes the most power at 200kW. The Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is quickest to 100km/h in 7.6s.

Track the cars you're comparing

Sign up free for price-drop alerts on the models in this comparison, plus our weekly new-car rundown covering launches, deals and reviews. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.

By subscribing, you agree to receive marketing emails. You can unsubscribe at any time. View our Privacy Policy.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs · Best mid-size SUVs