CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsBMW X5 M vs Land Rover Defender 130
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

BMW X5 M vs Land Rover Defender 130

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecBMWLand Rover
Price (RRP)$247,800$136,000
Fuel typePetrolDiesel
Power460kW257kW
0-100 km/h3.9s6.8s
Fuel Economy12.5 L/100km8.1 L/100km
Boot Space650L389L
Towing2,700kg3,000kg
Warranty5yr / Unlimited5yr / Unlimited
ANCAP SafetyNo dataNo data

Track the BMW X5 M & Land Rover Defender 130

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

The BMW X5 M starts from $247,800 before on-road costs, while the Land Rover Defender 130 opens at $136,000. That makes the Land Rover Defender 130 the more affordable entry point by $111,800.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $272,580 and $149,600 respectively.

Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Land Rover Defender 130 by roughly $6,270 in fuel alone.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Feature Showdown

The BMW X5 M features a 14.9-inch touchscreen paired with a 12.3-inch digital dash, while the Land Rover Defender 130 gets a 11.4-inch display and 12.3-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The BMW X5 M stands out with head-up display, panoramic roof, ventilated seats, power tailgate and Harman Kardon audio that you will not find on the Land Rover Defender 130. The Land Rover Defender 130 counters with Meridian audio and ambient lighting. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Interior trim differs: the BMW X5 M gets merino leather upholstery while the Land Rover Defender 130 offers leather. Climate control is 4-zone in the BMW X5 M and 3-zone in the Land Rover Defender 130.

Drivetrain

The BMW X5 M uses a Petrol producing 460kW and 750Nm of torque, sent through a auto to a AWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 3.9 seconds.

The Land Rover Defender 130 responds with a 3.0 i6 D350 Diesel Mild Hybrid making 257kW and 700Nm, paired to a 8-speed automatic driving all four wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 6.8 seconds.

The BMW X5 M has the clear power advantage at 460kW vs 257kW. In the real-world sprint, the BMW X5 M is 2.9s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The BMW X5 M measures 4,948mm long on a 2,972mm wheelbase, 151mm shorter than the Land Rover Defender 130 at 5,099mm (3,022mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Land Rover Defender 130 generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 650L in the BMW X5 M and 389L in the Land Rover Defender 130, giving the BMW X5 M a 261L advantage. The Land Rover Defender 130 seats 7 vs 5.

For towing, the Land Rover Defender 130 leads with a 3,000kg braked capacity vs 2,700kg. That 300kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

12.7m to 12.8m

TightestBMW X5 M CompetitionTightest turn at 12.7m, easiest U-turns and carparks
BMW X5 M Competition
12.7mTighter
Best
Land Rover Defender 130 X-Dynamic SE D350
12.8m
Worst
BMW X5 M Competition
12.7m · Large

Based on 12.7m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Land Rover Defender 130 X-Dynamic SE D350
12.8m · Large

Based on 12.8m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Compare U-turns side by side

Turning Circle · U-turn compare

kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars
Tap to add/remove
TightestBMW X5 MTightest turn at 12.7m, needs the least road to swing around
BMW X5 MTightest12.7 m
Large△ 3-point
Land Rover Defender 13012.8 m
Large△ 3-point
Scrub the turn

0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep

Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $3,563/year for the BMW X5 M and $2,309/year for the Land Rover Defender 130. That is a $1,254 annual difference in favour of the Land Rover Defender 130.

Estimated annual total: $3,563 (BMW X5 M) vs $2,309 (Land Rover Defender 130). The Land Rover Defender 130 saves you roughly $1,254 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 5 years / 999,999km (BMW X5 M) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Land Rover Defender 130). Both match on warranty length.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the BMW X5 M if: You prioritise performance, need more boot space, or prefer BMW's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Land Rover Defender 130 if: You want the lower entry price, want lower running costs, need stronger towing, or prefer Land Rover's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

This is genuinely close. The BMW X5 M and Land Rover Defender 130 trade blows across the spec sheet, and neither runs away with an outright win. The Land Rover Defender 130 will save you roughly $1,254 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the BMW X5 M has a clear edge. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, BMW X5 M and Land Rover Defender 130?

The Land Rover Defender 130 is the cheapest at $136,000 before on-road costs. That undercuts the BMW X5 M by $111,800.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Land Rover Defender 130 uses the least fuel at 8.1L/100km on the combined cycle.

What are the ANCAP safety ratings?

None of BMW X5 M and Land Rover Defender 130 carry a published ANCAP rating yet — check back as they are tested.

Which has the most boot space?

The BMW X5 M has the largest boot at 650L.

Which can tow the most?

The Land Rover Defender 130 has the highest braked towing capacity at 3,000kg.

Which is the most powerful?

The BMW X5 M makes the most power at 460kW. The BMW X5 M is quickest to 100km/h in 3.9s.

Free alerts

Track the cars you're comparing

Get price-drop and spec-change alerts on the models in this comparison, plus our weekly new-car rundown of launches, deals and reviews.

  • Price-drop alerts on these models
  • Spec-change alerts
  • Weekly new-car rundown

No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs · Best mid-size SUVs