CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsBMW X6 M vs Land Rover Defender OCTA
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

BMW X6 M vs Land Rover Defender OCTA

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecBMWLand Rover
Price (RRP)$247,900$304,500
Power460kW467kW
0-100 km/h4.8s4s
Fuel Economy8.8 L/100km13.1 L/100km
Boot Space600L972L
Towing3,500kg3,500kg
Warranty5yr / Unlimited5yr / Unlimited
ANCAP SafetyNo data5 Stars

Price Breakdown

The BMW X6 M starts from $247,900 before on-road costs, while the Land Rover Defender OCTA opens at $304,500. That makes the BMW X6 M the more affordable entry point by $56,600.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $272,690 and $334,950 respectively.

Over 5 years, the running costs favour the BMW X6 M by roughly $6,130 in fuel alone.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Feature Showdown

The BMW X6 M features a 14.9-inch touchscreen paired with a 12.3-inch digital dash, while the Land Rover Defender OCTA gets a 11.4-inch display and 12.3-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The BMW X6 M stands out with head-up display and Harman Kardon audio that you will not find on the Land Rover Defender OCTA. The Land Rover Defender OCTA counters with Meridian audio and ambient lighting. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Interior trim differs: the BMW X6 M gets merino leather upholstery while the Land Rover Defender OCTA offers leather. Climate control is 4-zone in the BMW X6 M and 3-zone in the Land Rover Defender OCTA.

Drivetrain

The BMW X6 M uses a Petrol producing 460kW and 750Nm of torque, sent through a auto to a AWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 4.8 seconds.

The Land Rover Defender OCTA responds with a 4.4L V8 Twin-Turbo Petrol Mild Hybrid making 467kW and 750Nm, paired to a 8-speed automatic driving all four wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 4 seconds.

The Land Rover Defender OCTA has the clear power advantage at 467kW vs 460kW. In the real-world sprint, the Land Rover Defender OCTA is 0.8s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The BMW X6 M measures 4,960mm long on a 2,975mm wheelbase, 147mm longer than the Land Rover Defender OCTA at 4,813mm (3,023mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Land Rover Defender OCTA generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 600L in the BMW X6 M and 972L in the Land Rover Defender OCTA, giving the Land Rover Defender OCTA a 372L advantage.

For towing, the Land Rover Defender OCTA leads with a 3,500kg braked capacity vs 3,500kg. That 0kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

12.7m to 12.8m

BMW X6 M Competition
12.7mTighter
Best
Land Rover Defender OCTA OCTA
12.8m
Worst
BMW X6 M
12.7m · Large

Based on 12.7m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Land Rover Defender OCTA
12.8m · Large

Based on 12.8m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $2,508/year for the BMW X6 M and $3,734/year for the Land Rover Defender OCTA. That is a $1,226 annual difference in favour of the BMW X6 M.

Estimated annual total: $2,508 (BMW X6 M) vs $3,734 (Land Rover Defender OCTA). The BMW X6 M saves you roughly $1,226 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 5 years / 999,999km (BMW X6 M) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Land Rover Defender OCTA). Both match on warranty length.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the BMW X6 M if: You want the lower entry price, want lower running costs, or prefer BMW's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Land Rover Defender OCTA if: You prioritise performance, need more boot space, or prefer Land Rover's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Land Rover Defender OCTA takes 3 of 5 key spec categories. The BMW X6 M will save you roughly $1,226 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Land Rover Defender OCTA has a clear edge. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, BMW X6 M and Land Rover Defender OCTA?

The BMW X6 M is the cheapest at $247,900 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Land Rover Defender OCTA by $56,600.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The BMW X6 M uses the least fuel at 8.8L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched — Land Rover Defender OCTA all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which has the most boot space?

The Land Rover Defender OCTA has the largest boot at 972L.

Which can tow the most?

The BMW X6 M has the highest braked towing capacity at 3,500kg.

Which is the most powerful?

The Land Rover Defender OCTA makes the most power at 467kW. The Land Rover Defender OCTA is quickest to 100km/h in 4s.

Get ahead of your next car

Join free for new-car launches, news, reviews and buying guides. The independent take on what's new in Australia and what's actually worth buying, no dealer spin. Plus early access and founding-member pricing on the upcoming CarSorted Pro Report. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.

By subscribing, you agree to receive marketing emails. You can unsubscribe at any time. View our Privacy Policy.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs