BYD Atto 2 DM-i vs Nissan ARIYA
Two electric SUVs go head to head. Which EV is the better buy for Australian drivers in 2026?
Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.
BYD Atto 2 DM-i
Price TBC
SUV
Plug-in Hybrid
1.5L 4-cylinder petrol
156kW
5.1 kWh/100km
ANCAP: no data
425L
Nissan ARIYA
From $55,840
SUV
Electric
Electric
160kW
—
5★ ANCAP
466L
BYD Atto 2 DM-i: not on sale yet, so BYD hasn't published price and warranty.
A blank cell below means we don't have that figure, not that the car scores badly on it. We leave them empty rather than estimate, so any row where one car is blank isn't a like-for-like comparison yet.
Plug-in hybrid fuel economy is shown as a hybrid (battery depleted) so it compares fairly with the other car. A PHEV's official "combined" figure assumes you start every trip fully charged, so real-world economy depends on how often you plug in. Electric range shows how far it goes before the petrol engine is needed.
Track the BYD Atto 2 DM-i & Nissan ARIYA
Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.
Price Breakdown
Pricing for one or both models is yet to be confirmed for the Australian market. We will update this comparison when official RRPs are announced.
Safety Rundown
ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.
Charging Times
How long each takes to charge, from a household power point to ultra-rapid DC, estimated from battery size and max charge rates.
How long to charge
18kWh usableEstimates from usable battery size and the car's max charge rates (7.4kW AC). Real times vary with temperature, starting charge, charger output and the charging curve.
How long to charge
87kWh usablePublic DC
50kW charger · 0–80%
Ultra-rapid DC
up to 130kW · 0–80%
Estimates from usable battery size and the car's max charge rates (7.4kW AC, 130kW DC). Real times vary with temperature, starting charge, charger output and the charging curve.
Feature Showdown
Both come with modern infotainment systems. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.
The BYD Atto 2 DM-i stands out with Apple CarPlay and panoramic roof — features our data doesn't list for the Nissan ARIYA. The Nissan ARIYA counters with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto, head-up display, heated front seats and power tailgate. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.
Drivetrain
The BYD Atto 2 DM-i uses a 1.5L 4-cylinder petrol producing 156kW and 300Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a FWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 7.5 seconds.
The Nissan ARIYA responds with a Electric making 160kW and 300Nm, paired to a automatic driving the front wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 8 seconds.
The Nissan ARIYA has the clear power advantage at 160kW vs 156kW. In the 0-100 sprint (manufacturer-claimed), the BYD Atto 2 DM-i is 0.5s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.
Battery: 18kWh (BYD Atto 2 DM-i) vs 63kWh (Nissan ARIYA), giving WLTP ranges of 90km and 385km.
Space & Comfort
The BYD Atto 2 DM-i measures 4,330mm long on a 2,620mm wheelbase, 265mm shorter than the Nissan ARIYA at 4,595mm (2,775mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Nissan ARIYA generally means more rear legroom.
Boot space is 425L in the BYD Atto 2 DM-i and 466L in the Nissan ARIYA, giving the Nissan ARIYA a 41L advantage.
For towing, the Nissan ARIYA leads with a 750kg braked capacity vs 750kg. That 0kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.
Turning Circle
Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.
10.6m to 11.5m
Based on 10.6m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Based on 11.5m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Turning circle ratings
Compare U-turns side by side
Turning Circle · U-turn compare
kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep
Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.
Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.
True Cost to Own
Running cost data is not yet available for both models. We will update when figures are confirmed.
Who Should Buy Which?
Buy the BYD Atto 2 DM-i if: You or prefer BYD's approach to design and ownership experience.
Buy the Nissan ARIYA if: You prioritise performance, need more boot space, or prefer Nissan's approach to design and ownership experience.
The Verdict
The Nissan ARIYA takes 4 of 5 key spec categories. If boot space matters, the Nissan ARIYA has a clear edge. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.
Common questions
Which is cheapest, BYD Atto 2 DM-i and Nissan ARIYA?
The Nissan ARIYA is the cheapest at $55,840 before on-road costs.
Which is the most fuel-efficient?
The BYD Atto 2 DM-i uses the least fuel at 5.1L/100km on the combined cycle.
What are the ANCAP safety ratings?
Nissan ARIYA holds a 5-star ANCAP rating. We have no published ANCAP rating for BYD Atto 2 DM-i, so there is nothing to compare on crash performance. Compare the active-safety features above instead.
Which has the most boot space?
The Nissan ARIYA has the largest boot at 466L.
Which is the most powerful?
The Nissan ARIYA makes the most power at 160kW. The BYD Atto 2 DM-i is quickest to 100km/h in 7.5s.
Stay across the market
Get our weekly new-car rundown of launches, price moves, deals and reviews, straight from the data.
- Weekly new-car rundown
- Price cuts and new deals
- New launches and reviews
No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.
Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.
Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026
Comments (0)
Sign in to join the conversation
No comments yet. Be the first!
