CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsBYD Atto 3 vs Mitsubishi Outlander
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

BYD Atto 3 vs Mitsubishi Outlander

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecBYDMitsubishi
Price (RRP)$39,990$39,990
Range (WLTP)345km
Battery49.9 kWh
Power150kW135kW
0-100 km/h7.3s8.7s
Max DC Charge80kW
10-80% Charge Time46 min
Fuel Economy7.3 L/100km
Boot Space440L478L
Towing1,500kg2,000kg
Warranty6yr / 150k km10yr / 200k km
ANCAP Safety5 Stars5 Stars

Price Breakdown

The BYD Atto 3 starts from $39,990 before on-road costs, while the Mitsubishi Outlander opens at $39,990. Both land at the same RRP, so on-road costs and dealer deals become the real differentiator.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $43,989 and $43,989 respectively.

The BYD Atto 3 qualifies for FBT exemption as an electric vehicle, which can dramatically reduce the effective cost for novated lease buyers. The Mitsubishi Outlander, as a petrol model, does not qualify.

Safety Rundown

Both the BYD Atto 3 and Mitsubishi Outlander hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating. Adult occupant protection scored 82% for the BYD Atto 3 and 85% for the Mitsubishi Outlander.

Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. The BYD Atto 3 packs more ADAS features with 6 out of 10 key systems fitted, compared to 1 in the Mitsubishi Outlander.

Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, a reversing camera. Airbag count is 7 in the BYD Atto 3 and 7 in the Mitsubishi Outlander.

Feature Showdown

The BYD Atto 3 features a 12.8-inch touchscreen, while the Mitsubishi Outlander gets a 12.3-inch display. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The BYD Atto 3 stands out with Dirac audio that you will not find on the Mitsubishi Outlander. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Drivetrain

The BYD Atto 3 uses a Electric producing 150kW and 310Nm of torque, sent through a auto to a FWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 7.3 seconds.

The Mitsubishi Outlander responds with a Petrol making 135kW and 244Nm, paired to a automatic driving the front wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 8.7 seconds.

The BYD Atto 3 has the clear power advantage at 150kW vs 135kW. In the real-world sprint, the BYD Atto 3 is 1.4s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The BYD Atto 3 measures 4,455mm long on a 2,720mm wheelbase, 255mm shorter than the Mitsubishi Outlander at 4,710mm (2,705mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the BYD Atto 3 generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 440L in the BYD Atto 3 and 478L in the Mitsubishi Outlander, giving the Mitsubishi Outlander a 38L advantage.

For towing, the Mitsubishi Outlander leads with a 2,000kg braked capacity vs 1,500kg. That 500kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

11.0m to 11.0m

BYD Atto 3 Essential
11.0mTighter
Best
Mitsubishi Outlander ES 2WD
11.0m
Best
BYD Atto 3
11.0m · Good

Based on 11.0m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Mitsubishi Outlander
11.0m · Good

Based on 11.0m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large

True Cost to Own

Running cost data is not yet available for both models. We will update when figures are confirmed.

Warranty: 6 years / 150,000km (BYD Atto 3) vs 10 years / 200,000km (Mitsubishi Outlander). The Mitsubishi Outlander has longer coverage.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the BYD Atto 3 if: You prioritise performance, or prefer BYD's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Mitsubishi Outlander if: You need more boot space, value a longer warranty, need stronger towing, or prefer Mitsubishi's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Mitsubishi Outlander takes 3 of 5 key spec categories. If boot space matters, the Mitsubishi Outlander has a clear edge. The Mitsubishi Outlander adds peace of mind with a longer 10-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, BYD Atto 3 and Mitsubishi Outlander?

The BYD Atto 3 is the cheapest at $39,990 before on-road costs.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Mitsubishi Outlander uses the least fuel at 7.3L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched — BYD Atto 3 and Mitsubishi Outlander all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which has the most boot space?

The Mitsubishi Outlander has the largest boot at 478L.

Which can tow the most?

The Mitsubishi Outlander has the highest braked towing capacity at 2,000kg.

Which has the best warranty?

The Mitsubishi Outlander has the longest warranty at 10 years / 200k km.

Which is the most powerful?

The BYD Atto 3 makes the most power at 150kW. The BYD Atto 3 is quickest to 100km/h in 7.3s.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs