CS
CarSorted
Home›Comparisons›BYD Atto 3 vs Skoda Karoq
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

BYD Atto 3 vs Skoda Karoq

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

Data checked: specs 31 Aug 2026, price 1 Oct 2026

Winner
BYD Atto 3
BYD

BYD Atto 3

17 of 27 standard · no option data · 6 not offered · 4 no data

From $39,990

Body

SUV

Fuel type

Electric

Engine

Electric

Power

150kW

Economy

—

Safety

5★ ANCAP

Boot (seats up)

440L

74CarSorted Score / 100

Top CarSorted Score, 74 vs 72

Skoda Karoq
Skoda

Skoda Karoq

17 of 27 standard · no option data · 10 no data

From $44,490

Body

SUV

Fuel type

Petrol

Engine

Petrol

Power

110kW

Economy

6.6 L/100km

Safety

ANCAP: no data

Boot (seats up)

521L

72CarSorted Score / 100

Driver assistance, as the maker lists it

Swipe across. Tap a feature to see what it does and each car's source.

StandardOptional: printed price, +pack or NCO (no-cost)No, not offeredNo dataCounts beside each car use the same colours; ? is no option data.

Car
BYD Atto 3Essential9?03
Skoda Karoq110TSI Sportline10?02

From each manufacturer's Australian equipment list. No data means that car's document does not say. The drawings are our own illustrations of how each kind of system works.

SpecBYDSkoda
Price (RRP)$39,990$44,490
Equipped to matchEach car with the other's standard kit

$39,990RRP

  • cannot be matched: Premium Audio and Power Tailgate not offered

$44,490RRP

  • no option data for this car

Printed option prices only. A pack is counted once and makes the figure a floor when it carries no printed price. Nothing is inferred from the other car.

Fuel typeElectricPetrol
Range (WLTP)345km—
Battery49.9 kWh—
Power150kW110kW
0-100 km/h7.9s9.2s
Max DC Charge70kW—
10-80% Charge Time46 min—
Fuel Economy—6.6 L/100km
Boot (seats up)440L521L
Towing750kg1,500kg
Warranty6yr / 150k km7yr / Unlimited
ANCAP Safety5 StarsNo data
V2LYesNo

Track the BYD Atto 3 & Skoda Karoq

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

The BYD Atto 3 starts from $39,990 before on-road costs, while the Skoda Karoq opens at $44,490. That makes the BYD Atto 3 the more affordable entry point by $4,500.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $43,989 and $48,939 respectively.

The BYD Atto 3 currently qualifies for the electric-vehicle FBT exemption, which can dramatically reduce the effective cost for novated lease buyers. The Skoda Karoq does not: only battery-electric vehicles qualify.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Recalls on our record

BYD Atto 3

  • REC-005579 · published 22 Dec 2022BYD is conducting a Voluntary Safety Recall on all affected vehicles.Year range on the notice: 2022

Skoda Karoq

  • REC-001199 · published 8 Jul 2019In some instances, the front driver air bag may not inflate to its fullest capacity fast enough when required.Year range on the notice: 2017 - 2018

A recall covers the builds its notice lists, not every car of a model. Check your VIN at vehiclerecalls.gov.au.

Charging Times

How long each takes to charge, from a household power point to ultra-rapid DC, estimated from battery size and max charge rates.

How long to charge

49.9kWh usable

Public DC

50kW charger · 0–80%

48 min

Ultra-rapid DC

up to 70kW · 0–80%

43 min

Estimates from usable battery size and the car's max charge rates (7kW AC, 70kW DC). Real times vary with temperature, starting charge, charger output and the charging curve.

Feature Showdown

The BYD Atto 3 features a 12.8-inch touchscreen paired with a 5-inch digital dash, while the Skoda Karoq gets a 8-inch display and 10.3-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The BYD Atto 3 stands out with V2L — features our data doesn't list for the Skoda Karoq. The Skoda Karoq counters with power tailgate and Canton audio. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Interior trim differs: the BYD Atto 3 gets synthetic leather upholstery while the Skoda Karoq offers cloth. Climate control is 1-zone in the BYD Atto 3 and 2-zone in the Skoda Karoq.

Drivetrain

The BYD Atto 3 uses a Electric producing 150kW and 310Nm of torque, sent through a auto to a FWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 7.9 seconds.

The Skoda Karoq responds with a Petrol making 110kW and 250Nm, paired to a 8 speed automatic driving the front wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 9.2 seconds.

The BYD Atto 3 has the clear power advantage at 150kW vs 110kW. In the 0-100 sprint (manufacturer-claimed), the BYD Atto 3 is 1.3s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The BYD Atto 3 measures 4,455mm long on a 2,720mm wheelbase, 65mm longer than the Skoda Karoq at 4,390mm (2,638mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the BYD Atto 3 generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 440L in the BYD Atto 3 and 521L in the Skoda Karoq, giving the Skoda Karoq a 81L advantage.

For towing, the Skoda Karoq leads with a 1,500kg braked capacity vs 750kg. That 750kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

10.2m to 11.0m

TightestSkoda Karoq 110TSI SportlineTightest turn at 10.2m, easiest U-turns and carparks
Skoda Karoq 110TSI Sportline
10.2mTighter
Best
BYD Atto 3 Essential
11.0m
Worst
BYD Atto 3 Essential
11.0m · Good

Based on 11.0m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Skoda Karoq 110TSI Sportline
10.2m · Good

Based on 10.2m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Compare U-turns side by side

Turning Circle · U-turn compare

kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars
Tap to add/remove
TightestSkoda KaroqTightest turn at 10.2m, needs the least road to swing around
BYD Atto 311.0 m
Good△ 3-point
Skoda KaroqTightest10.2 m
Good△ 3-point
Scrub the turn

0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep

Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.

True Cost to Own

Running cost data is not yet available for both models. We will update when figures are confirmed.

Warranty: 6 years / 150,000km (BYD Atto 3) vs 7 years / 999,999km (Skoda Karoq). The Skoda Karoq has longer coverage.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the BYD Atto 3 if: You want the lower entry price, prioritise performance, or prefer BYD's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Skoda Karoq if: You need more boot space, value a longer warranty, need stronger towing, or prefer Skoda's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

BYD Atto 3: Top CarSorted Score, 74 vs 72

The BYD Atto 3 comes out ahead on the CarSorted Score (74 vs 72), taking 4 of 7 key spec rows below and coming in at a lower price. The deciding gaps: safety (BYD Atto 3 ahead by 25), technology (Skoda Karoq ahead by 16), practicality (Skoda Karoq ahead by 9). If boot space matters, the Skoda Karoq has a clear edge. The Skoda Karoq adds peace of mind with a longer 7-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, BYD Atto 3 and Skoda Karoq?

The BYD Atto 3 is the cheapest at $39,990 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Skoda Karoq by $4,500.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Skoda Karoq uses the least fuel at 6.6L/100km on the combined cycle.

What are the ANCAP safety ratings?

BYD Atto 3 holds a 5-star ANCAP rating. We have no published ANCAP rating for Skoda Karoq, so there is nothing to compare on crash performance. Compare the active-safety features above instead.

Which has the most boot space?

The Skoda Karoq has the largest boot at 521L with the seats up (1,630L with the seats folded).

Which can tow the most?

The Skoda Karoq has the highest braked towing capacity at 1,500kg.

Which has the best warranty?

The Skoda Karoq has the longest warranty at 7 years / Unlimited.

Which is the most powerful?

The BYD Atto 3 makes the most power at 150kW. The BYD Atto 3 is quickest to 100km/h in 7.9s.

Free newsletter

Stay across the market

Get our weekly new-car rundown of launches, price moves, deals and reviews, straight from the data.

  • Weekly new-car rundown
  • Price cuts and new deals
  • New launches and reviews

No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs · Best electric SUVs · Best mid-size SUVs