CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsCadillac Vistiq vs Toyota LandCruiser 300
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Cadillac Vistiq vs Toyota LandCruiser 300

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecCadillacToyota
Price (RRP)$116,000$97,990
Range (WLTP)461km
Battery91 kWh
Power459kW227kW
0-100 km/h4.6s8.6s
Max DC Charge190kW
10-80% Charge Time35 min
Fuel Economy10.6 L/100km
Boot Space500L700L
Towing2,500kg3,500kg
Warranty5yr / 150k km5yr / 999.999k km
ANCAP SafetyNo data5 Stars

Price Breakdown

The Cadillac Vistiq starts from $116,000 before on-road costs, while the Toyota LandCruiser 300 opens at $97,990. That makes the Toyota LandCruiser 300 the more affordable entry point by $18,010.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $127,600 and $107,789 respectively.

The Cadillac Vistiq qualifies for FBT exemption as an electric vehicle, which can dramatically reduce the effective cost for novated lease buyers. The Toyota LandCruiser 300, as a petrol model, does not qualify.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Feature Showdown

The Cadillac Vistiq features a 33-inch touchscreen paired with a 33-inch digital dash, while the Toyota LandCruiser 300 gets a 8-inch display and 7-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The Cadillac Vistiq stands out with head-up display, wireless charging, panoramic roof, heated front seats, ventilated seats, power tailgate, AKG audio and ambient lighting that you will not find on the Toyota LandCruiser 300. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Interior trim differs: the Cadillac Vistiq gets leather upholstery while the Toyota LandCruiser 300 offers cloth. Climate control is 4-zone in the Cadillac Vistiq and 2-zone in the Toyota LandCruiser 300.

Drivetrain

The Cadillac Vistiq uses a Electric producing 459kW and 880Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a AWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 4.6 seconds.

The Toyota LandCruiser 300 responds with a Diesel Twin-Turbo V6 making 227kW and 700Nm, paired to a automatic driving the rear wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 8.6 seconds.

The Cadillac Vistiq has the clear power advantage at 459kW vs 227kW. In the real-world sprint, the Cadillac Vistiq is 4.0s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Cadillac Vistiq measures 4,953mm long on a 3,000mm wheelbase, 27mm shorter than the Toyota LandCruiser 300 at 4,980mm (2,850mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Cadillac Vistiq generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 500L in the Cadillac Vistiq and 700L in the Toyota LandCruiser 300, giving the Toyota LandCruiser 300 a 200L advantage.

For towing, the Toyota LandCruiser 300 leads with a 3,500kg braked capacity vs 2,500kg. That 1,000kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

11.8m to 12.6m

Toyota LandCruiser 300 GX
11.8mTighter
Best
Cadillac Vistiq Platinum AWD
12.6m
Worst
Cadillac Vistiq
12.6m · Large

Based on 12.6m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Toyota LandCruiser 300
11.8m · Average

Based on 11.8m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large

True Cost to Own

Running cost data is not yet available for both models. We will update when figures are confirmed.

Warranty: 5 years / 150,000km (Cadillac Vistiq) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Toyota LandCruiser 300). Both match on warranty length.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Cadillac Vistiq if: You prioritise performance, or prefer Cadillac's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Toyota LandCruiser 300 if: You want the lower entry price, need more boot space, need stronger towing, or prefer Toyota's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Toyota LandCruiser 300 takes 3 of 5 key spec categories and comes in at a lower price. If boot space matters, the Toyota LandCruiser 300 has a clear edge. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Cadillac Vistiq and Toyota LandCruiser 300?

The Toyota LandCruiser 300 is the cheapest at $97,990 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Cadillac Vistiq by $18,010.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Toyota LandCruiser 300 uses the least fuel at 10.6L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched — Toyota LandCruiser 300 all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which has the most boot space?

The Toyota LandCruiser 300 has the largest boot at 700L.

Which can tow the most?

The Toyota LandCruiser 300 has the highest braked towing capacity at 3,500kg.

Which is the most powerful?

The Cadillac Vistiq makes the most power at 459kW. The Cadillac Vistiq is quickest to 100km/h in 4.6s.

Get ahead of your next car

Join free for new-car launches, news, reviews and buying guides. The independent take on what's new in Australia and what's actually worth buying, no dealer spin. Plus early access and founding-member pricing on the upcoming CarSorted Pro Report. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.

By subscribing, you agree to receive marketing emails. You can unsubscribe at any time. View our Privacy Policy.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs