CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsCUPRA Tavascan vs Skoda Enyaq
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

CUPRA Tavascan vs Skoda Enyaq

Two electric cars go head to head. Which EV is the better buy for Australian drivers in 2026?

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecCUPRASkoda
Price (RRP)$60,990$59,990
Range (WLTP)531km575km
Battery77 kWh82 kWh
Power210kW210kW
0-100 km/h6.8s5.4s
Max DC Charge135kW175kW
10-80% Charge Time26 min21 min
Boot Space540L585L
Towing1,000kg
Warranty5yr / Unlimited7yr / Unlimited
ANCAP Safety5 Stars5 Stars

Price Breakdown

The CUPRA Tavascan starts from $60,990 before on-road costs, while the Skoda Enyaq opens at $59,990. That makes the Skoda Enyaq the more affordable entry point by $1,000.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $67,089 and $65,989 respectively.

Both models qualify for Fringe Benefit Tax (FBT) exemption, which is a significant advantage for salary-sacrificed novated leases. Depending on your tax bracket, this can save $5,000-$15,000+ per year compared to an equivalent ICE vehicle.

Safety Rundown

Both the CUPRA Tavascan and Skoda Enyaq hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating. Adult occupant protection scored 89% for the CUPRA Tavascan and 94% for the Skoda Enyaq.

Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. The CUPRA Tavascan packs more ADAS features with 9 out of 10 key systems fitted, compared to 5 in the Skoda Enyaq.

Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, lane keep assist, adaptive cruise control, a reversing camera.

Feature Showdown

The CUPRA Tavascan features a 15-inch touchscreen paired with a 5.3-inch digital dash, while the Skoda Enyaq gets a 13-inch display and 5.3-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The CUPRA Tavascan stands out with ambient lighting that you will not find on the Skoda Enyaq. The Skoda Enyaq counters with head-up display and ventilated seats. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Interior trim differs: the CUPRA Tavascan gets cloth upholstery while the Skoda Enyaq offers synthetic leather.

Drivetrain

The CUPRA Tavascan uses a Electric Motor producing 210kW and 545Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a RWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 6.8 seconds.

The Skoda Enyaq responds with a Electric Motor making 210kW and 545Nm, paired to a automatic driving all four wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 5.4 seconds.

Power output is identical on paper, so the difference comes down to tuning, weight distribution, and suspension. In the real-world sprint, the Skoda Enyaq is 1.4s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Battery: 77kWh (CUPRA Tavascan) vs 82kWh (Skoda Enyaq), giving WLTP ranges of 531km and 575km. DC fast charging peaks at 135kW (CUPRA Tavascan) vs 175kW (Skoda Enyaq).

Space & Comfort

The CUPRA Tavascan measures 4,644mm long on a 2,766mm wheelbase, 15mm shorter than the Skoda Enyaq at 4,659mm (2,766mm wheelbase).

Boot space is 540L in the CUPRA Tavascan and 585L in the Skoda Enyaq, giving the Skoda Enyaq a 45L advantage.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

9.3m to 10.2m

Skoda Enyaq 85 Sportline
9.3mTighter
Best
CUPRA Tavascan Endurance
10.2m
Worst
CUPRA Tavascan
10.2m · Good

Based on 10.2m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Skoda Enyaq
9.3m · Excellent

Based on 9.3m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large

True Cost to Own

Running cost data is not yet available for both models. We will update when figures are confirmed.

Warranty: 5 years / 999,999km (CUPRA Tavascan) vs 7 years / 999,999km (Skoda Enyaq). The Skoda Enyaq has longer coverage.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the CUPRA Tavascan if: You or prefer CUPRA's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Skoda Enyaq if: You want the lower entry price, need more boot space, value a longer warranty, or prefer Skoda's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Skoda Enyaq takes 8 of 8 key spec categories and comes in at a lower price. If boot space matters, the Skoda Enyaq has a clear edge. The Skoda Enyaq adds peace of mind with a longer 7-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, CUPRA Tavascan and Skoda Enyaq?

The Skoda Enyaq is the cheapest at $59,990 before on-road costs. That undercuts the CUPRA Tavascan by $1,000.

Which has the longest driving range?

The Skoda Enyaq has the most range at 575km (WLTP).

Which charges fastest?

The Skoda Enyaq accepts the highest DC charging at up to 175kW.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched — CUPRA Tavascan and Skoda Enyaq all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which has the most boot space?

The Skoda Enyaq has the largest boot at 585L.

Which can tow the most?

The CUPRA Tavascan has the highest braked towing capacity at 1,000kg.

Which has the best warranty?

The Skoda Enyaq has the longest warranty at 7 years / Unlimited.

Get ahead of your next car

Join free for new-car launches, news, reviews and buying guides. The independent take on what's new in Australia and what's actually worth buying, no dealer spin. Plus early access and founding-member pricing on the upcoming CarSorted Pro Report. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.

By subscribing, you agree to receive marketing emails. You can unsubscribe at any time. View our Privacy Policy.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUV Coupes · All SUVs