Ford Everest vs Mitsubishi Mirage
A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular cars compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.
Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.
Ford Everest
From $59,490
SUV
Diesel
Diesel Bi-Turbo
154kW
7.2 L/100km
5★ ANCAP
259L
Mitsubishi Mirage
Price TBC
hatch
petrol
—
57kW
4.6 L/100km
5★ ANCAP
235L
Track the Ford Everest & Mitsubishi Mirage
Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.
Price Breakdown
Pricing for one or both models is yet to be confirmed for the Australian market. We will update this comparison when official RRPs are announced.
Safety Rundown
Both the Ford Everest and Mitsubishi Mirage hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating.
Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. The Ford Everest packs more ADAS features with 7 out of 10 key systems fitted, compared to 0 in the Mitsubishi Mirage.
Both include the essentials: core safety systems.
Feature Showdown
Both come with modern infotainment systems.
The Ford Everest stands out with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto and wireless charging that you will not find on the Mitsubishi Mirage. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.
Drivetrain
The Ford Everest uses a Diesel Bi-Turbo producing 154kW and 500Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a 4WD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 10.1 seconds.
The Mitsubishi Mirage lines up making 57kW and 100Nm, paired to a 5-speed manual driving the rear wheels.
The Ford Everest has the clear power advantage at 154kW vs 57kW. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.
Space & Comfort
The Ford Everest measures 4,978mm long on a 2,900mm wheelbase, 1268mm longer than the Mitsubishi Mirage at 3,710mm (2,450mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Ford Everest generally means more rear legroom.
Boot space is 259L in the Ford Everest and 235L in the Mitsubishi Mirage, giving the Ford Everest a 24L advantage.
Turning Circle
Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.
4.6m to 11.8m
Based on 11.8m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Based on 4.6m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Turning circle ratings
Compare U-turns side by side
Turning Circle · U-turn compare
kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars1 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep
Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.
Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.
True Cost to Own
Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $2,052/year for the Ford Everest and $1,311/year for the Mitsubishi Mirage. That is a $741 annual difference in favour of the Mitsubishi Mirage.
Estimated annual total: $2,052 (Ford Everest) vs $1,311 (Mitsubishi Mirage). The Mitsubishi Mirage saves you roughly $741 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.
Warranty: 5 years / 999,999km (Ford Everest) vs 5 years / 100,000km (Mitsubishi Mirage). Both match on warranty length.
Who Should Buy Which?
Buy the Ford Everest if: You prioritise performance, need more boot space, or prefer Ford's approach to design and ownership experience.
Buy the Mitsubishi Mirage if: You want lower running costs, or prefer Mitsubishi's approach to design and ownership experience.
The Verdict
The Ford Everest takes 2 of 3 key spec categories. The Mitsubishi Mirage will save you roughly $741 a year in fuel. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.
Common questions
Which is cheapest, Ford Everest and Mitsubishi Mirage?
The Ford Everest is the cheapest at $59,490 before on-road costs.
Which is the most fuel-efficient?
The Mitsubishi Mirage uses the least fuel at 4.6L/100km on the combined cycle.
Which is safest?
They are evenly matched — Ford Everest and Mitsubishi Mirage all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.
Which has the most boot space?
The Ford Everest has the largest boot at 259L.
Which can tow the most?
The Ford Everest has the highest braked towing capacity at 3,500kg.
Which is the most powerful?
The Ford Everest makes the most power at 154kW.
Track the cars you're comparing
Sign up free for price-drop alerts on the models in this comparison, plus our weekly new-car rundown covering launches, deals and reviews. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.
By subscribing, you agree to receive marketing emails. You can unsubscribe at any time. View our Privacy Policy.
Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.
Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026
Comments (0)
Sign in to join the conversation
No comments yet. Be the first!
