Ford Everest vs Nissan Pulsar
A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular cars compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.
Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.
Track the Ford Everest & Nissan Pulsar
Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.
Price Breakdown
Pricing for one or both models is yet to be confirmed for the Australian market. We will update this comparison when official RRPs are announced.
Safety Rundown
Both the Ford Everest and Nissan Pulsar hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating.
Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. The Ford Everest packs more ADAS features with 7 out of 10 key systems fitted, compared to 0 in the Nissan Pulsar.
Both include the essentials: core safety systems.
Feature Showdown
Both come with modern infotainment systems.
The Ford Everest stands out with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto and wireless charging that you will not find on the Nissan Pulsar. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.
Drivetrain
The Ford Everest uses a Diesel Bi-Turbo producing 154kW and 500Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a 4WD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 10.1 seconds.
The Nissan Pulsar lines up making 96kW and 174Nm, paired to a cvt driving the rear wheels.
The Ford Everest has the clear power advantage at 154kW vs 96kW. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.
Space & Comfort
Boot space is 259L in the Ford Everest and 510L in the Nissan Pulsar, giving the Nissan Pulsar a 251L advantage.
Turning Circle
Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.
11.8m diameter
Average
Based on 11.8m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Turning circle ratings
Interactive simulator — U-turns, parking & towing
Turning Circle
Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns are easier in tight carparks and U-turns.
Average
Needs a 3-point turn (one reverse)
Needs about 10.3 m to swing round without stopping. Road is 9.0 m.
U-turn on a wide street
≥ 10 m — 3-point turn
U-turn on a standard street
7 m — 3-point turn
Standard parking bay
1.9 m wide — fits with room
Tight carpark aisle
6 m — careful, tight swing
Narrow laneway
3.5 m — no room to turn
Turning circle ratings
Standard widths: AU local streets carry ~5.5–7 m of carriageway; main roads ~9–12 m. AS 2890.1 carpark aisles are ~5.8–6.6 m for 90° bays (2.6 m wide × 5.4 m deep).
Road, aisle, swing and off-tracking figures are indicative estimates from the published turning circle. Verify in person before relying on them.
True Cost to Own
Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $2,052/year for the Ford Everest and $1,910/year for the Nissan Pulsar. That is a $142 annual difference in favour of the Nissan Pulsar.
Estimated annual total: $2,052 (Ford Everest) vs $1,910 (Nissan Pulsar). The Nissan Pulsar saves you roughly $142 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.
Warranty: 5 years / 999,999km (Ford Everest) vs 3 years / 100,000km (Nissan Pulsar). The Ford Everest has longer coverage.
Who Should Buy Which?
Buy the Ford Everest if: You prioritise performance, value a longer warranty, or prefer Ford's approach to design and ownership experience.
Buy the Nissan Pulsar if: You need more boot space, want lower running costs, or prefer Nissan's approach to design and ownership experience.
The Verdict
This is genuinely close. The Ford Everest and Nissan Pulsar trade blows across the spec sheet, and neither runs away with an outright win. The Nissan Pulsar will save you roughly $142 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Nissan Pulsar has a clear edge. The Ford Everest adds peace of mind with a longer 5-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.
Common questions
Which is cheapest, Ford Everest and Nissan Pulsar?
The Ford Everest is the cheapest at $59,490 before on-road costs.
Which is the most fuel-efficient?
The Nissan Pulsar uses the least fuel at 6.7L/100km on the combined cycle.
Which is safest?
They are evenly matched — Ford Everest and Nissan Pulsar all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.
Which has the most boot space?
The Nissan Pulsar has the largest boot at 510L.
Which can tow the most?
The Ford Everest has the highest braked towing capacity at 3,500kg.
Which has the best warranty?
The Ford Everest has the longest warranty at 5 years / Unlimited.
Which is the most powerful?
The Ford Everest makes the most power at 154kW.
Track the cars you're comparing
Sign up free for price-drop alerts on the models in this comparison, plus our weekly new-car rundown covering launches, deals and reviews. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.
By subscribing, you agree to receive marketing emails. You can unsubscribe at any time. View our Privacy Policy.
Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.
Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026
Comments (0)
Sign in to join the conversation
No comments yet. Be the first!
