CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsFord Falcon vs Toyota GR Supra
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Ford Falcon vs Toyota GR Supra

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular Sedans compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecFordToyota
Price (RRP)TBC$86,290
Fuel typePetrolPetrol
Power270kW285kW
0-100 km/h4.1s
Fuel Economy7.7 L/100km
Boot Space535L290L
Towing2,300kg
Warranty3yr / 100k km5yr / Unlimited
ANCAP Safety5 StarsNo data

Track the Ford Falcon & Toyota GR Supra

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

Pricing for one or both models is yet to be confirmed for the Australian market. We will update this comparison when official RRPs are announced.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Feature Showdown

The Ford Falcon features a 8-inch touchscreen, while the Toyota GR Supra gets a 8.8-inch display and 8.8-inch instruments.

The Toyota GR Supra counters with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto, wireless charging and heated front seats that the Ford Falcon does not offer. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Drivetrain

The Ford Falcon uses a 4.0L DOHC DI-VCT TURBO I6 producing 270kW and 533Nm of torque, sent through a 6-speed automatic to a RWD layout.

The Toyota GR Supra responds with a Petrol making 285kW and 500Nm, paired to a automatic driving the rear wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 4.1 seconds.

The Toyota GR Supra has the clear power advantage at 285kW vs 270kW. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Ford Falcon measures 4,949mm long on a 2,838mm wheelbase, 570mm longer than the Toyota GR Supra at 4,379mm (2,470mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Ford Falcon generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 535L in the Ford Falcon and 290L in the Toyota GR Supra, giving the Ford Falcon a 245L advantage. The Ford Falcon seats 5 vs 2.

0

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

10.6m diameter

Good

Toyota GR Supra GT
10.6m
Toyota GR Supra GT
10.6m · Good

Based on 10.6m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Interactive simulator — U-turns, parking & towing

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns are easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

10.6 m Ø

Good

9.0 m road
Toyota GR Supra Turning circle · Ø 10.6 m Kerb strike
Scrub the turn

Needs a 3-point turn (one reverse)

Needs about 9.3 m to swing round without stopping. Road is 9.0 m.

U-turn on a wide street

≥ 10 m — clears in one

!

U-turn on a standard street

7 m — 3-point turn

Standard parking bay

1.9 m wide — fits with room

Tight carpark aisle

6 m — swings in

Narrow laneway

3.5 m — no room to turn

Turning circle ratings

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets carry ~5.5–7 m of carriageway; main roads ~9–12 m. AS 2890.1 carpark aisles are ~5.8–6.6 m for 90° bays (2.6 m wide × 5.4 m deep).

Road, aisle, swing and off-tracking figures are indicative estimates from the published turning circle. Verify in person before relying on them.

True Cost to Own

Running cost data is not yet available for both models. We will update when figures are confirmed.

Warranty: 3 years / 100,000km (Ford Falcon) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Toyota GR Supra). The Toyota GR Supra has longer coverage.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Ford Falcon if: You need more boot space, or prefer Ford's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Toyota GR Supra if: You prioritise performance, value a longer warranty, or prefer Toyota's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

This is genuinely close. The Ford Falcon and Toyota GR Supra trade blows across the spec sheet, and neither runs away with an outright win. If boot space matters, the Ford Falcon has a clear edge. The Toyota GR Supra adds peace of mind with a longer 5-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Ford Falcon and Toyota GR Supra?

The Toyota GR Supra is the cheapest at $86,290 before on-road costs.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Toyota GR Supra uses the least fuel at 7.7L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched — Ford Falcon all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which has the most boot space?

The Ford Falcon has the largest boot at 535L.

Which can tow the most?

The Ford Falcon has the highest braked towing capacity at 2,300kg.

Which has the best warranty?

The Toyota GR Supra has the longest warranty at 5 years / Unlimited.

Which is the most powerful?

The Toyota GR Supra makes the most power at 285kW.

Track the cars you're comparing

Sign up free for price-drop alerts on the models in this comparison, plus our weekly new-car rundown covering launches, deals and reviews. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.

By subscribing, you agree to receive marketing emails. You can unsubscribe at any time. View our Privacy Policy.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All Sedans · Best family cars