CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsGAC Aion V vs Mazda CX-60
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

GAC Aion V vs Mazda CX-60

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecGACMazda
Price (RRP)$42,590$44,240
Range (WLTP)510km
Battery75.3 kWh
Power150kW138kW
0-100 km/h9s7.4s
Max DC Charge180kW
10-80% Charge Time24 min
Fuel Economy7.5 L/100km
Boot Space427L570L
Towing2,000kg
Warranty8yr / 150k km5yr / 999.999k km
ANCAP Safety5 Stars5 Stars
V2LYes (3.3kW)No

Price Breakdown

The GAC Aion V starts from $42,590 before on-road costs, while the Mazda CX-60 opens at $44,240. That makes the GAC Aion V the more affordable entry point by $1,650.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $46,849 and $48,664 respectively.

The GAC Aion V qualifies for FBT exemption as an electric vehicle, which can dramatically reduce the effective cost for novated lease buyers. The Mazda CX-60, as a petrol model, does not qualify.

Safety Rundown

Both the GAC Aion V and Mazda CX-60 hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating. Adult occupant protection scored 88% for the GAC Aion V and 91% for the Mazda CX-60.

Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. The GAC Aion V packs more ADAS features with 9 out of 10 key systems fitted, compared to 5 in the Mazda CX-60.

Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, lane keep assist, adaptive cruise control, a reversing camera. Airbag count is 7 in the GAC Aion V and 6 in the Mazda CX-60. The GAC Aion V adds a 360-degree camera that the Mazda CX-60 misses.

Feature Showdown

The GAC Aion V features a 14.6-inch touchscreen paired with a 8.9-inch digital dash, while the Mazda CX-60 gets a 10.3-inch display and 7-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The GAC Aion V stands out with wireless charging, panoramic roof, heated front seats, ventilated seats, power tailgate and V2L that you will not find on the Mazda CX-60. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Interior trim differs: the GAC Aion V gets pvc upholstery while the Mazda CX-60 offers cloth.

Drivetrain

The GAC Aion V uses a Electric producing 150kW and 210Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a FWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 9 seconds.

The Mazda CX-60 responds with a Petrol making 138kW and 250Nm, paired to a automatic driving the rear wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 7.4 seconds.

The GAC Aion V has the clear power advantage at 150kW vs 138kW. In the real-world sprint, the Mazda CX-60 is 1.6s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The GAC Aion V measures 4,605mm long on a 2,775mm wheelbase, 140mm shorter than the Mazda CX-60 at 4,745mm (2,870mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Mazda CX-60 generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 427L in the GAC Aion V and 570L in the Mazda CX-60, giving the Mazda CX-60 a 143L advantage.

0

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

11.2m to 11.4m

GAC Aion V Premium
11.2mTighter
Best
Mazda CX-60 G25 Pure
11.4m
Worst
GAC Aion V
11.2m · Average

Based on 11.2m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Mazda CX-60
11.4m · Average

Based on 11.4m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large

True Cost to Own

Running cost data is not yet available for both models. We will update when figures are confirmed.

Warranty: 8 years / 150,000km (GAC Aion V) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Mazda CX-60). The GAC Aion V has longer coverage.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the GAC Aion V if: You want the lower entry price, prioritise performance, value a longer warranty, or prefer GAC's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Mazda CX-60 if: You need more boot space, or prefer Mazda's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The GAC Aion V takes 4 of 7 key spec categories and comes in at a lower price. If boot space matters, the Mazda CX-60 has a clear edge. The GAC Aion V adds peace of mind with a longer 8-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, GAC Aion V and Mazda CX-60?

The GAC Aion V is the cheapest at $42,590 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Mazda CX-60 by $1,650.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Mazda CX-60 uses the least fuel at 7.5L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched — GAC Aion V and Mazda CX-60 all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which has the most boot space?

The Mazda CX-60 has the largest boot at 570L.

Which can tow the most?

The Mazda CX-60 has the highest braked towing capacity at 2,000kg.

Which has the best warranty?

The GAC Aion V has the longest warranty at 8 years / 150k km.

Which is the most powerful?

The GAC Aion V makes the most power at 150kW. The Mazda CX-60 is quickest to 100km/h in 7.4s.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs