CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsGWM ORA vs NIO Firefly
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

GWM ORA vs NIO Firefly

Two electric Hatchbacks go head to head. Which EV is the better buy for Australian drivers in 2026?

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecGWMNIO
Price (RRP)$31,990TBC
Fuel typeElectricElectric
Range (WLTP)347km330km
Battery57.7 kWh41.2 kWh
Power126kW105kW
0-100 km/h8.4s8.1s
Max DC Charge80kW100kW
10-80% Charge Time35 min35 min
Boot Space228L308L
Warranty7yr / Unlimited7yr / 150k km
ANCAP Safety5 StarsNo data

Track the GWM ORA & NIO Firefly

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

Pricing for one or both models is yet to be confirmed for the Australian market. We will update this comparison when official RRPs are announced.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Charging Times

How long each takes to charge — from a household power point to ultra-rapid DC — estimated from battery size and max charge rates.

How long to charge

59kWh usable

Public DC

50kW charger · 0–80%

57 min

Ultra-rapid DC

up to 80kW · 0–80%

44 min

Estimates from usable battery size and the car's max charge rates (6.6kW AC, 80kW DC). Real times vary with temperature, starting charge, charger output and the charging curve.

How long to charge

44.9kWh usable

Public DC

50kW charger · 0–80%

43 min

Ultra-rapid DC

up to 100kW · 0–80%

27 min

Estimates from usable battery size and the car's max charge rates (7kW AC, 100kW DC). Real times vary with temperature, starting charge, charger output and the charging curve.

Feature Showdown

The GWM ORA features a 10.3-inch touchscreen paired with a 10.3-inch digital dash, while the NIO Firefly gets a 13.2-inch display and 6-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The GWM ORA stands out with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto that you will not find on the NIO Firefly. The NIO Firefly counters with Apple CarPlay. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Drivetrain

The GWM ORA uses a Electric producing 126kW and 250Nm of torque, sent through a auto to a FWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 8.4 seconds.

The NIO Firefly responds with a Single electric motor making 105kW and 200Nm, paired to a automatic driving the rear wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 8.1 seconds.

The GWM ORA has the clear power advantage at 126kW vs 105kW. In the real-world sprint, the NIO Firefly is 0.3s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Battery: 57.7kWh (GWM ORA) vs 41.2kWh (NIO Firefly), giving WLTP ranges of 347km and 330km. DC fast charging peaks at 80kW (GWM ORA) vs 100kW (NIO Firefly).

Space & Comfort

The GWM ORA measures 4,235mm long on a 2,650mm wheelbase, 232mm longer than the NIO Firefly at 4,003mm (2,700mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the NIO Firefly generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 228L in the GWM ORA and 308L in the NIO Firefly, giving the NIO Firefly a 80L advantage.

0

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

10.4m to 11.2m

NIO Firefly Launch
10.4mTighter
Best
GWM ORA Lux
11.2m
Worst
GWM ORA Lux
11.2m · Average

Based on 11.2m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
NIO Firefly Launch
10.4m · Good

Based on 10.4m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large

True Cost to Own

Running cost data is not yet available for both models. We will update when figures are confirmed.

Warranty: 7 years / 999,999km (GWM ORA) vs 7 years / 150,000km (NIO Firefly). Both match on warranty length.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the GWM ORA if: You prioritise performance, or prefer GWM's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the NIO Firefly if: You need more boot space, or prefer NIO's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

This is genuinely close. The GWM ORA and NIO Firefly trade blows across the spec sheet, and neither runs away with an outright win. If boot space matters, the NIO Firefly has a clear edge. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, GWM ORA and NIO Firefly?

The GWM ORA is the cheapest at $31,990 before on-road costs.

Which has the longest driving range?

The NIO Firefly has the most range at 427km (WLTP).

Which charges fastest?

The NIO Firefly accepts the highest DC charging at up to 100kW.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched — GWM ORA all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which has the most boot space?

The NIO Firefly has the largest boot at 308L.

Which is the most powerful?

The GWM ORA makes the most power at 126kW. The NIO Firefly is quickest to 100km/h in 8.1s.

Free: Chinese Cars in Australia Cheat Sheet

Sign up free and we'll email you our Chinese Cars Cheat Sheet (PDF) — all 22 brands ranked on service, parts, warranty and dealer experience. Plus new-car launches, reviews and founding-member pricing on the upcoming CarSorted Pro Report. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.

By subscribing, you agree to receive marketing emails. You can unsubscribe at any time. View our Privacy Policy.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All Hatchbacks · Best electric cars