CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsGWM Tank 500 vs Jeep Grand Cherokee
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

GWM Tank 500 vs Jeep Grand Cherokee

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecGWMJeep
Price (RRP)$59,990$65,950
Power255kW210kW
0-100 km/h8.5s
Fuel Economy8.5 L/100km9.9 L/100km
Boot Space98L1067L
Towing3,000kg2,813kg
Warranty7yr / 999.999k km5yr / 100k km
ANCAP Safety5 Stars4 Stars

Price Breakdown

The GWM Tank 500 starts from $59,990 before on-road costs, while the Jeep Grand Cherokee opens at $65,950. That makes the GWM Tank 500 the more affordable entry point by $5,960.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $65,989 and $72,545 respectively.

Over 5 years, the running costs favour the GWM Tank 500 by roughly $1,995 in fuel alone.

Safety Rundown

The GWM Tank 500 holds a 5-star ANCAP rating vs 4 stars for the Jeep Grand Cherokee. Adult occupant protection scored 85% for the GWM Tank 500 and 81% for the Jeep Grand Cherokee.

Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. The Jeep Grand Cherokee packs more ADAS features with 6 out of 10 key systems fitted, compared to 5 in the GWM Tank 500.

Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, lane keep assist, adaptive cruise control, a reversing camera.

Feature Showdown

The GWM Tank 500 features a 14.6-inch touchscreen paired with a 12.3-inch digital dash, while the Jeep Grand Cherokee gets a 10.1-inch display and 10.3-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The GWM Tank 500 stands out with Apple CarPlay that you will not find on the Jeep Grand Cherokee. The Jeep Grand Cherokee counters with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto, heated front seats and power tailgate. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Interior trim differs: the GWM Tank 500 gets synthetic leather upholstery while the Jeep Grand Cherokee offers leather.

Drivetrain

The GWM Tank 500 uses a Hybrid producing 255kW and 648Nm of torque, sent through a 9-speed auto to a 4WD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 8.5 seconds.

The Jeep Grand Cherokee responds with a Petrol V6 Pentastar w/ ESS making 210kW and 344Nm, paired to a 8-speed automatic w/ paddle shifters driving the rear wheels.

The GWM Tank 500 has the clear power advantage at 255kW vs 210kW. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The GWM Tank 500 measures 5,078mm long on a 2,850mm wheelbase, 164mm longer than the Jeep Grand Cherokee at 4,914mm (2,964mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Jeep Grand Cherokee generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 98L in the GWM Tank 500 and 1067L in the Jeep Grand Cherokee, giving the Jeep Grand Cherokee a 969L advantage. The GWM Tank 500 seats 7 vs 5.

For towing, the GWM Tank 500 leads with a 3,000kg braked capacity vs 2,813kg. That 187kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

11.2m to 11.6m

GWM Tank 500 Lux
11.2mTighter
Best
Jeep Grand Cherokee Night Eagle
11.6m
Worst
GWM Tank 500
11.2m · Average

Based on 11.2m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Jeep Grand Cherokee
11.6m · Average

Based on 11.6m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $2,423/year for the GWM Tank 500 and $2,822/year for the Jeep Grand Cherokee. That is a $399 annual difference in favour of the GWM Tank 500.

Estimated annual total: $2,423 (GWM Tank 500) vs $2,822 (Jeep Grand Cherokee). The GWM Tank 500 saves you roughly $399 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 7 years / 999,999km (GWM Tank 500) vs 5 years / 100,000km (Jeep Grand Cherokee). The GWM Tank 500 has longer coverage.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the GWM Tank 500 if: You want the lower entry price, prioritise performance, want lower running costs, value a longer warranty, need stronger towing, or prefer GWM's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Jeep Grand Cherokee if: You need more boot space, or prefer Jeep's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The GWM Tank 500 takes 6 of 7 key spec categories and comes in at a lower price. The GWM Tank 500 will save you roughly $399 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Jeep Grand Cherokee has a clear edge. The GWM Tank 500 adds peace of mind with a longer 7-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, GWM Tank 500 and Jeep Grand Cherokee?

The GWM Tank 500 is the cheapest at $59,990 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Jeep Grand Cherokee by $5,960.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The GWM Tank 500 uses the least fuel at 8.5L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

The GWM Tank 500 has the highest ANCAP rating at 5 stars.

Which has the most boot space?

The Jeep Grand Cherokee has the largest boot at 1067L.

Which can tow the most?

The GWM Tank 500 has the highest braked towing capacity at 3,000kg.

Which has the best warranty?

The GWM Tank 500 has the longest warranty at 7 years / 1000k km.

Which is the most powerful?

The GWM Tank 500 makes the most power at 255kW.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs