Holden Captiva vs Ford Everest
A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.
Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.
Data checked: specs 8 Aug 2026, price 24 Jun 2026
Driver assistance, as the maker lists it
Swipe across. Tap a feature to see what it does and each car's source.
StandardOptional: printed price, +pack or NCO (no-cost)No, not offeredNo dataCounts beside each car use the same colours; ? is no option data.
From each manufacturer's Australian equipment list. No data means that car's document does not say. The drawings are our own illustrations of how each kind of system works.
Holden Captiva: we're still completing price, kerb weight and 0-100km/h.
A blank cell below means we don't have that figure, not that the car scores badly on it. We leave them empty rather than estimate, so any row where one car is blank isn't a like-for-like comparison yet.
No price
- no option data for this car
$68,990RRP
- no option data for this car
Printed option prices only. A pack is counted once and makes the figure a floor when it carries no printed price. Nothing is inferred from the other car.
Track the Holden Captiva & Ford Everest
Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.
Price Breakdown
Pricing for one or both models is yet to be confirmed for the Australian market. We will update this comparison when official RRPs are announced.
Safety Rundown
ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.
Recalls on our record
Holden Captiva
- REC-000534 · published 6 Mar 2018A fracture on the fuel feed hose connector may cause the fuel feed hose to disconnect and leak fuel.Year range on the notice: 2006 - 2010
- REC-000531 · published 24 Dec 2015Rocker arm bearings in the engine may fail after prolonged exposure to degraded oil.Year range on the notice: the notice prints no build range
- REC-000529 · published 2 Nov 2015The label on the jack supplied with the vehicle identifies a ‘safe working load’, which is not permitted by the mandatory standard for jacks if the jack is intended for use with a specific vehicle.Year range on the notice: the notice prints no build range
- 2 more on the model page.
Ford Everest
- REC-006683 · published 28 Jul 2026Due to a software issue, the transmission fluid pump gears could fail while driving.Year range on the notice: 2018 - 2020
- REC-006659 · published 13 Jul 2026Due to a software issue, the transmission fluid pump gears could fail while driving.Year range on the notice: 2017 - 2019
- REC-006541 · published 12 Feb 2026Due to a software issue, under certain circumstances if the battery level drops below a critical threshold, the transmission may shift into Park when the vehicle is travelling at speeds below 6 km/h.Year range on the notice: 2022
- 12 more on the model page.
A recall covers the builds its notice lists, not every car of a model. Check your VIN at vehiclerecalls.gov.au.
Feature Showdown
The Holden Captiva features a 7-inch touchscreen, while the Ford Everest gets a 12-inch display and 8-inch instruments.
The Ford Everest counters with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto, wireless charging, ventilated seats and power tailgate. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.
Drivetrain
The Holden Captiva uses a 3.0 litre 60-degree Double Overhead Cam V6 with four valves per cylinder. Twin knock control sensors with individual cylinder adaptive control. On board diagnostics. Spark Ignition Direct Injection (SIDI) producing 190kW and 288Nm of torque, sent through a 6 speed automatic transmission with active select to a AWD layout.
The Ford Everest responds with a Diesel V6 Turbo making 184kW and 600Nm, paired to a automatic driving all four wheels.
The Holden Captiva has the clear power advantage at 190kW vs 184kW. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.
Space & Comfort
The Holden Captiva measures 4,673mm long on a 2,707mm wheelbase, 305mm shorter than the Ford Everest at 4,978mm (2,900mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Ford Everest generally means more rear legroom.
Boot space is 85L in the Holden Captiva and 259L in the Ford Everest, giving the Ford Everest a 174L advantage. Fold the rears and you get 930L vs 1818L.
For towing, the Ford Everest leads with a 3,500kg braked capacity vs 2,000kg. That 1,500kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.
Turning Circle
Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.
11.8m to 11.9m
Based on 11.9m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Based on 11.8m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Turning circle ratings
Compare U-turns side by side
Turning Circle · U-turn compare
kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep
Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.
Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.
True Cost to Own
Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $2,879/year for the Holden Captiva and $2,423/year for the Ford Everest. That is a $456 annual difference in favour of the Ford Everest.
Warranty: 3 years / 100,000km (Holden Captiva) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Ford Everest). The Ford Everest has longer coverage.
Who Should Buy Which?
Buy the Holden Captiva if: You prioritise performance, or prefer Holden's approach to design and ownership experience.
Buy the Ford Everest if: You need more boot space, want lower running costs, value a longer warranty, need stronger towing, or prefer Ford's approach to design and ownership experience.
The Verdict
The CarSorted Score calls this a draw (45 vs 75). The Holden Captiva and Ford Everest trade blows across the spec sheet, and neither runs away with an outright win. The Ford Everest will save you roughly $456 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Ford Everest has a clear edge. The Ford Everest adds peace of mind with a longer 5-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.
Common questions
Which is cheapest, Holden Captiva and Ford Everest?
The Ford Everest is the cheapest at $68,990 before on-road costs.
Which is the most fuel-efficient?
The Ford Everest uses the least fuel at 8.5L/100km on the combined cycle.
What are the ANCAP safety ratings?
Ford Everest holds a 5-star ANCAP rating. We have no published ANCAP rating for Holden Captiva, so there is nothing to compare on crash performance. Compare the active-safety features above instead.
Which has the most boot space?
The Ford Everest has the largest boot at 259L with the seats up (1,818L with the seats folded).
Which can tow the most?
The Ford Everest has the highest braked towing capacity at 3,500kg.
Which has the best warranty?
The Ford Everest has the longest warranty at 5 years / Unlimited.
Which is the most powerful?
The Holden Captiva makes the most power at 190kW.
Stay across the market
Get our weekly new-car rundown of launches, price moves, deals and reviews, straight from the data.
- Weekly new-car rundown
- Price cuts and new deals
- New launches and reviews
No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.
Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.
Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026
Comments (0)
Sign in to join the conversation
No comments yet. Be the first!
