CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsHonda Prelude vs Subaru WRX
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Honda Prelude vs Subaru WRX

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular Sedans compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecHondaSubaru
Price (RRP)$61,100$48,190
Fuel typeHybridPetrol
Power135kW202kW
0-100 km/h8.2s6.4s
Fuel Economy4.3 L/100km9.9 L/100km
Boot Space264L414L
Warranty5yr / Unlimited5yr / Unlimited
ANCAP SafetyNo dataNo data

Track the Honda Prelude & Subaru WRX

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

The Honda Prelude starts from $61,100 before on-road costs, while the Subaru WRX opens at $48,190. That makes the Subaru WRX the more affordable entry point by $12,910.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $67,210 and $53,009 respectively.

Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Honda Prelude by roughly $7,980 in fuel alone.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Feature Showdown

The Honda Prelude features a 9-inch touchscreen paired with a 10.2-inch digital dash, while the Subaru WRX gets a 11.6-inch display and 4.2-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The Honda Prelude stands out with wireless charging, Bose audio and ambient lighting that you will not find on the Subaru WRX. The Subaru WRX counters with Harman Kardon audio. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Interior trim differs: the Honda Prelude gets leather upholstery while the Subaru WRX offers cloth.

Drivetrain

The Honda Prelude uses a Inline 4 producing 135kW and 315Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a FWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 8.2 seconds.

The Subaru WRX responds with a Petrol making 202kW and 350Nm, paired to a manual driving all four wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 6.4 seconds.

The Subaru WRX has the clear power advantage at 202kW vs 135kW. In the real-world sprint, the Subaru WRX is 1.8s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Honda Prelude measures 4,693mm long on a 2,735mm wheelbase, 23mm longer than the Subaru WRX at 4,670mm (2,675mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Honda Prelude generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 264L in the Honda Prelude and 414L in the Subaru WRX, giving the Subaru WRX a 150L advantage. The Subaru WRX seats 5 vs 4.

0

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

11.2m to 11.8m

TightestSubaru WRX AWD Sedan ManualTightest turn at 11.2m, easiest U-turns and carparks
Subaru WRX AWD Sedan Manual
11.2mTighter
Best
Honda Prelude e:HEV
11.8m
Worst
Honda Prelude e:HEV
11.8m · Average

Based on 11.8m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Subaru WRX AWD Sedan Manual
11.2m · Average

Based on 11.2m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Compare U-turns side by side

Turning Circle · U-turn compare

kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars
Tap to add/remove
TightestSubaru WRXTightest turn at 11.2m, needs the least road to swing around
Honda Prelude11.8 m
Average△ 3-point
Subaru WRXTightest11.2 m
Average△ 3-point
Scrub the turn

0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep

Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $1,226/year for the Honda Prelude and $2,822/year for the Subaru WRX. That is a $1,596 annual difference in favour of the Honda Prelude.

Estimated annual total: $1,226 (Honda Prelude) vs $2,822 (Subaru WRX). The Honda Prelude saves you roughly $1,596 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 5 years / 999,999km (Honda Prelude) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Subaru WRX). Both match on warranty length.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Honda Prelude if: You want lower running costs, or prefer Honda's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Subaru WRX if: You want the lower entry price, prioritise performance, need more boot space, or prefer Subaru's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Subaru WRX takes 4 of 5 key spec categories and comes in at a lower price. The Honda Prelude will save you roughly $1,596 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Subaru WRX has a clear edge. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Honda Prelude and Subaru WRX?

The Subaru WRX is the cheapest at $48,190 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Honda Prelude by $12,910.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Honda Prelude uses the least fuel at 4.3L/100km on the combined cycle.

What are the ANCAP safety ratings?

None of Honda Prelude and Subaru WRX carry a published ANCAP rating yet — check back as they are tested.

Which has the most boot space?

The Subaru WRX has the largest boot at 414L.

Which is the most powerful?

The Subaru WRX makes the most power at 202kW. The Subaru WRX is quickest to 100km/h in 6.4s.

Track the cars you're comparing

Sign up free for price-drop alerts on the models in this comparison, plus our weekly new-car rundown covering launches, deals and reviews. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.

By subscribing, you agree to receive marketing emails. You can unsubscribe at any time. View our Privacy Policy.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All Sedans · Best hybrid cars · Best family cars