CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsHyundai i20 vs Kia pro_cee'd
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Hyundai i20 vs Kia pro_cee'd

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular Hatchbacks compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

Specifications in progress

Hyundai i20: we're still completing kerb weight, seat count, 0-100km/h, warranty and braked towing.

Kia pro_cee'd: we're still completing 0-100km/h, drive type and braked towing.

Blank cells below mean we don't have that figure, not that the car scores badly on it. We leave them empty rather than estimate, so any row where one car is blank isn't a like-for-like comparison yet.

SpecHyundaiKia
Price (RRP)$32,490$29,990
Fuel typePetrolPetrol
Power150kW150kW
Fuel Economy6.9 L/100km7.4 L/100km
Boot Space310L380L
Warranty7yr / Unlimited
ANCAP SafetyNo dataNo data

Track the Hyundai i20 & Kia pro_cee'd

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

The Hyundai i20 starts from $32,490 before on-road costs, while the Kia pro_cee'd opens at $29,990. That makes the Kia pro_cee'd the more affordable entry point by $2,500.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $35,739 and $32,989 respectively.

Over 5 years, the running costs are nearly identical since both have similar efficiency.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Feature Showdown

Both come with modern infotainment systems.

The Hyundai i20 stands out with Apple CarPlay, wireless charging, Bose audio and ambient lighting that you will not find on the Kia pro_cee'd. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Drivetrain

The Hyundai i20 uses a SmartStream G1.6 T-GDi producing 150kW and 275Nm of torque, sent through a 6-speed manual to a FWD layout.

The Kia pro_cee'd responds with a 1.6L T-GDi Turbo Petrol making 150kW and 265Nm, paired to a 6-speed manual.

Power output is identical on paper, so the difference comes down to tuning, weight distribution, and suspension. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Hyundai i20 measures 4,075mm long on a 2,580mm wheelbase, 235mm shorter than the Kia pro_cee'd at 4,310mm (2,650mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Kia pro_cee'd generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 310L in the Hyundai i20 and 380L in the Kia pro_cee'd, giving the Kia pro_cee'd a 70L advantage. Fold the rears and you get 1123L vs 1225L.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

10.5m to 10.6m

TightestHyundai i20 N 1.6 T-GDi ManualTightest turn at 10.5m, easiest U-turns and carparks
Hyundai i20 N 1.6 T-GDi Manual
10.5mTighter
Best
Kia pro_cee'd GT
10.6m
Worst
Hyundai i20 N 1.6 T-GDi Manual
10.5m · Good

Based on 10.5m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Kia pro_cee'd GT
10.6m · Good

Based on 10.6m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Compare U-turns side by side

Turning Circle · U-turn compare

kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars
Tap to add/remove
TightestHyundai i20Tightest turn at 10.5m, needs the least road to swing around
Hyundai i20Tightest10.5 m
Good△ 3-point
Kia pro_cee'd10.6 m
Good△ 3-point
Scrub the turn

0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep

Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $1,967/year for the Hyundai i20 and $2,109/year for the Kia pro_cee'd. That is a $142 annual difference in favour of the Hyundai i20.

Estimated annual total: $1,967 (Hyundai i20) vs $2,109 (Kia pro_cee'd). The Hyundai i20 saves you roughly $142 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Hyundai i20 if: You want lower running costs, or prefer Hyundai's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Kia pro_cee'd if: You want the lower entry price, need more boot space, or prefer Kia's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Kia pro_cee'd takes 2 of 3 key spec categories and comes in at a lower price. The Hyundai i20 will save you roughly $142 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Kia pro_cee'd has a clear edge. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Hyundai i20 and Kia pro_cee'd?

The Kia pro_cee'd is the cheapest at $29,990 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Hyundai i20 by $2,500.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Hyundai i20 uses the least fuel at 6.9L/100km on the combined cycle.

What are the ANCAP safety ratings?

None of Hyundai i20 and Kia pro_cee'd carry a published ANCAP rating yet — check back as they are tested.

Which has the most boot space?

The Kia pro_cee'd has the largest boot at 380L.

Free alerts

Track the cars you're comparing

Get price-drop and spec-change alerts on the models in this comparison, plus our weekly new-car rundown of launches, deals and reviews.

  • Price-drop alerts on these models
  • Spec-change alerts
  • Weekly new-car rundown

No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All Hatchbacks · Best family cars