CS
CarSorted
Home›Comparisons›Isuzu NNR 45-150 vs Mazda CX-80
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Isuzu NNR 45-150 vs Mazda CX-80

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular cars compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecIsuzuMazda
Price (RRP)$56,900$56,100
Fuel typeDieselDiesel
Power110kW187kW
0-100 km/h—9s
Fuel Economy11 L/100km5.2 L/100km
Boot Space—258L
Towing4,000kg2,000kg
Warranty6yr / 250k km5yr / Unlimited
ANCAP SafetyNo data5 Stars

Track the Isuzu NNR 45-150 & Mazda CX-80

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

The Isuzu NNR 45-150 starts from $56,900 before on-road costs, while the Mazda CX-80 opens at $56,100. That makes the Mazda CX-80 the more affordable entry point by $800.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $62,590 and $61,710 respectively.

Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Mazda CX-80 by roughly $8,265 in fuel alone.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Feature Showdown

The Isuzu NNR 45-150 features a 6.2-inch touchscreen, while the Mazda CX-80 gets a 10.3-inch display and 7-inch instruments.

The Mazda CX-80 counters with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Drivetrain

The Isuzu NNR 45-150 uses a Diesel producing 110kW and 375Nm of torque, sent through a 6-speed manual (mt) to a RWD layout.

The Mazda CX-80 responds with a Diesel making 187kW and 550Nm, paired to a automatic driving all four wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 9 seconds.

The Mazda CX-80 has the clear power advantage at 187kW vs 110kW. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Isuzu NNR 45-150 measures 5,248mm long on a 2,795mm wheelbase, 258mm longer than the Mazda CX-80 at 4,990mm (3,120mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Mazda CX-80 generally means more rear legroom.

For towing, the Isuzu NNR 45-150 leads with a 4,000kg braked capacity vs 2,000kg. That 2,000kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

10.0m to 11.8m

TightestIsuzu NNR 45-150 Cab Chassis MT SWBTightest turn at 10.0m, easiest U-turns and carparks
Isuzu NNR 45-150 Cab Chassis MT SWB
10.0mTighter
Best
Mazda CX-80 D50e Pure
11.8m
Worst
Isuzu NNR 45-150 Cab Chassis MT SWB
10.0m · Good

Based on 10.0m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Mazda CX-80 D50e Pure
11.8m · Average

Based on 11.8m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Compare U-turns side by side

Turning Circle · U-turn compare

kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars
Tap to add/remove
TightestIsuzu NNR 45-150Tightest turn at 10.0m, needs the least road to swing around
Isuzu NNR 45-150Tightest10.0 m
Good△ 3-point
Mazda CX-8011.8 m
Average△ 3-point
Scrub the turn

0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep

Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $3,135/year for the Isuzu NNR 45-150 and $1,482/year for the Mazda CX-80. That is a $1,653 annual difference in favour of the Mazda CX-80.

Warranty: 6 years / 250,000km (Isuzu NNR 45-150) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Mazda CX-80). The Isuzu NNR 45-150 has longer coverage.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Isuzu NNR 45-150 if: You value a longer warranty, need stronger towing, or prefer Isuzu's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Mazda CX-80 if: You want the lower entry price, prioritise performance, want lower running costs, or prefer Mazda's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Mazda CX-80 takes 3 of 5 key spec categories and comes in at a lower price. The Mazda CX-80 will save you roughly $1,653 a year in fuel. The Isuzu NNR 45-150 adds peace of mind with a longer 6-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Isuzu NNR 45-150 and Mazda CX-80?

The Mazda CX-80 is the cheapest at $56,100 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Isuzu NNR 45-150 by $800.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Mazda CX-80 uses the least fuel at 5.2L/100km on the combined cycle.

What are the ANCAP safety ratings?

Mazda CX-80 holds a 5-star ANCAP rating. We have no published ANCAP rating for Isuzu NNR 45-150, so there is nothing to compare on crash performance. Compare the active-safety features above instead.

Which can tow the most?

The Isuzu NNR 45-150 has the highest braked towing capacity at 4,000kg.

Which has the best warranty?

The Isuzu NNR 45-150 has the longest warranty at 6 years / 250k km.

Which is the most powerful?

The Mazda CX-80 makes the most power at 187kW.

Free newsletter

Stay across the market

Get our weekly new-car rundown of launches, price moves, deals and reviews, straight from the data.

  • Weekly new-car rundown
  • Price cuts and new deals
  • New launches and reviews

No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All Trucks · All SUVs · Best family cars · Best hybrid cars