CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsKia Cerato vs Mazda Mazda2
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Kia Cerato vs Mazda Mazda2

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular Hatchbacks compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecKiaMazda
Price (RRP)TBC$22,990
Fuel typePetrolPetrol
Power112kW81kW
0-100 km/h10.5s
Fuel Economy7.4 L/100km5 L/100km
Boot Space428L250L
Towing1,100kg900kg
Warranty7yr / Unlimited5yr / Unlimited
ANCAP Safety5 StarsNo data

Track the Kia Cerato & Mazda Mazda2

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

Pricing for one or both models is yet to be confirmed for the Australian market. We will update this comparison when official RRPs are announced.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Feature Showdown

Both come with modern infotainment systems.

The Mazda Mazda2 counters with Apple CarPlay that the Kia Cerato does not offer. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Drivetrain

The Kia Cerato lines up producing 112kW and 192Nm of torque, sent through a 6-speed automatic to a FWD layout.

The Mazda Mazda2 responds with a Petrol making 81kW and 142Nm, paired to a automatic driving the front wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 10.5 seconds.

The Kia Cerato has the clear power advantage at 112kW vs 81kW. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Kia Cerato measures 4,510mm long on a 2,700mm wheelbase, 425mm longer than the Mazda Mazda2 at 4,085mm (2,570mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Kia Cerato generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 428L in the Kia Cerato and 250L in the Mazda Mazda2, giving the Kia Cerato a 178L advantage.

For towing, the Kia Cerato leads with a 1,100kg braked capacity vs 900kg. That 200kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

9.8m diameter

Excellent

Mazda Mazda2 G15 Evolve Hatch
9.8m
Mazda2 G15 Evolve Hatch
9.8m · Excellent

Based on 9.8m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Interactive simulator — U-turns, parking & towing

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns are easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

9.8 m Ø

Excellent

9.0 m road
Mazda Mazda2 Turning circle · Ø 9.8 m Kerb strike
Scrub the turn

Clears the U-turn in one swing

Needs about 8.5 m of road; you have 9.0 m.

U-turn on a wide street

≥ 10 m — clears in one

!

U-turn on a standard street

7 m — 3-point turn

Standard parking bay

1.7 m wide — fits with room

Tight carpark aisle

6 m — swings in

Narrow laneway

3.5 m — no room to turn

Turning circle ratings

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets carry ~5.5–7 m of carriageway; main roads ~9–12 m. AS 2890.1 carpark aisles are ~5.8–6.6 m for 90° bays (2.6 m wide × 5.4 m deep).

Road, aisle, swing and off-tracking figures are indicative estimates from the published turning circle. Verify in person before relying on them.

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $2,109/year for the Kia Cerato and $1,425/year for the Mazda Mazda2. That is a $684 annual difference in favour of the Mazda Mazda2.

Estimated annual total: $2,109 (Kia Cerato) vs $1,425 (Mazda Mazda2). The Mazda Mazda2 saves you roughly $684 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 7 years / 999,999km (Kia Cerato) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Mazda Mazda2). The Kia Cerato has longer coverage.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Kia Cerato if: You prioritise performance, need more boot space, value a longer warranty, need stronger towing, or prefer Kia's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Mazda Mazda2 if: You want lower running costs, or prefer Mazda's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Kia Cerato takes 4 of 5 key spec categories. The Mazda Mazda2 will save you roughly $684 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Kia Cerato has a clear edge. The Kia Cerato adds peace of mind with a longer 7-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Kia Cerato and Mazda Mazda2?

The Mazda Mazda2 is the cheapest at $22,990 before on-road costs.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Mazda Mazda2 uses the least fuel at 5L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched — Kia Cerato all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which has the most boot space?

The Kia Cerato has the largest boot at 428L.

Which can tow the most?

The Kia Cerato has the highest braked towing capacity at 1,100kg.

Which has the best warranty?

The Kia Cerato has the longest warranty at 7 years / Unlimited.

Which is the most powerful?

The Kia Cerato makes the most power at 112kW.

Track the cars you're comparing

Sign up free for price-drop alerts on the models in this comparison, plus our weekly new-car rundown covering launches, deals and reviews. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.

By subscribing, you agree to receive marketing emails. You can unsubscribe at any time. View our Privacy Policy.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All Hatchbacks · Best family cars