CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsKia Optima vs Mazda Mazda3
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Kia Optima vs Mazda Mazda3

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular Sedans compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecKiaMazda
Price (RRP)TBC$26,490
Fuel typePetrolPetrol
Power180kW114kW
0-100 km/h9.7s
Fuel Economy8.5 L/100km5.9 L/100km
Boot Space510L295L
Towing1,200kg
Warranty7yr / Unlimited5yr / Unlimited
ANCAP Safety5 StarsNo data

Track the Kia Optima & Mazda Mazda3

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

Pricing for one or both models is yet to be confirmed for the Australian market. We will update this comparison when official RRPs are announced.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Feature Showdown

The Kia Optima features a 8-inch touchscreen, while the Mazda Mazda3 gets a 8.8-inch display and 7-inch instruments.

The Kia Optima stands out with wireless charging, heated front seats, ventilated seats and Harman/Kardon audio that you will not find on the Mazda Mazda3. The Mazda Mazda3 counters with Apple CarPlay. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Drivetrain

The Kia Optima uses a 2.0L T-GDI turbo producing 180kW and 350Nm of torque, sent through a 6-speed automatic to a FWD layout.

The Mazda Mazda3 responds with a Petrol making 114kW and 200Nm, paired to a automatic driving the front wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 9.7 seconds.

The Kia Optima has the clear power advantage at 180kW vs 114kW. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Kia Optima measures 4,855mm long on a 2,805mm wheelbase, 395mm longer than the Mazda Mazda3 at 4,460mm (2,725mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Kia Optima generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 510L in the Kia Optima and 295L in the Mazda Mazda3, giving the Kia Optima a 215L advantage.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

10.6m to 10.9m

TightestMazda Mazda3 G20 PureTightest turn at 10.6m, easiest U-turns and carparks
Mazda Mazda3 G20 Pure
10.6mTighter
Best
Kia Optima GT
10.9m
Worst
Kia Optima GT
10.9m · Good

Based on 10.9m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Mazda3 G20 Pure
10.6m · Good

Based on 10.6m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Compare U-turns side by side

Turning Circle · U-turn compare

kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars
Tap to add/remove
TightestMazda Mazda3Tightest turn at 10.6m, needs the least road to swing around
Kia Optima10.9 m
Good△ 3-point
Mazda Mazda3Tightest10.6 m
Good△ 3-point
Scrub the turn

0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep

Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $2,423/year for the Kia Optima and $1,682/year for the Mazda Mazda3. That is a $741 annual difference in favour of the Mazda Mazda3.

Estimated annual total: $2,423 (Kia Optima) vs $1,682 (Mazda Mazda3). The Mazda Mazda3 saves you roughly $741 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 7 years / 999,999km (Kia Optima) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Mazda Mazda3). The Kia Optima has longer coverage.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Kia Optima if: You prioritise performance, need more boot space, value a longer warranty, or prefer Kia's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Mazda Mazda3 if: You want lower running costs, or prefer Mazda's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Kia Optima takes 3 of 4 key spec categories. The Mazda Mazda3 will save you roughly $741 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Kia Optima has a clear edge. The Kia Optima adds peace of mind with a longer 7-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Kia Optima and Mazda Mazda3?

The Mazda Mazda3 is the cheapest at $26,490 before on-road costs.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Mazda Mazda3 uses the least fuel at 5.9L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched — Kia Optima all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which has the most boot space?

The Kia Optima has the largest boot at 510L.

Which can tow the most?

The Mazda Mazda3 has the highest braked towing capacity at 1,200kg.

Which has the best warranty?

The Kia Optima has the longest warranty at 7 years / Unlimited.

Which is the most powerful?

The Kia Optima makes the most power at 180kW.

Free alerts

Track the cars you're comparing

Get price-drop and spec-change alerts on the models in this comparison, plus our weekly new-car rundown of launches, deals and reviews.

  • Price-drop alerts on these models
  • Spec-change alerts
  • Weekly new-car rundown

No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All Sedans · Best family cars