CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsKia Sportage vs Land Rover Range Rover Evoque
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Kia Sportage vs Land Rover Range Rover Evoque

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecKiaLand Rover
Price (RRP)$38,490TBC
Fuel typePetrolPetrol
Power115kW184kW
0-100 km/h8.5s7.6s
Fuel Economy8.1 L/100km8.3 L/100km
Boot Space543L472L
Towing1,650kg2,000kg
Warranty7yr / Unlimited5yr / Unlimited
ANCAP Safety5 StarsNo data

Track the Kia Sportage & Land Rover Range Rover Evoque

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

Pricing for one or both models is yet to be confirmed for the Australian market. We will update this comparison when official RRPs are announced.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Feature Showdown

The Kia Sportage features a 12.3-inch touchscreen paired with a 4-inch digital dash, while the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque gets a 11.4-inch display and 12.3-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The Kia Sportage stands out with Apple CarPlay that you will not find on the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque. The Land Rover Range Rover Evoque counters with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto, heated front seats, power tailgate, Meridian audio and ambient lighting. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Interior trim differs: the Kia Sportage gets cloth upholstery while the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque offers grained leather. Climate control is 1-zone in the Kia Sportage and 2-zone in the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque.

Drivetrain

The Kia Sportage uses a Petrol producing 115kW and 192Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a FWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 8.5 seconds.

The Land Rover Range Rover Evoque responds with a 2.0L Ingenium 4-cylinder turbocharged petrol making 184kW and 365Nm, paired to a 9-speed automatic driving all four wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 7.6 seconds.

The Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has the clear power advantage at 184kW vs 115kW. In the real-world sprint, the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is 0.9s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Kia Sportage measures 4,685mm long on a 2,755mm wheelbase, 314mm longer than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque at 4,371mm (2,681mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Kia Sportage generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 543L in the Kia Sportage and 472L in the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, giving the Kia Sportage a 71L advantage.

For towing, the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque leads with a 2,000kg braked capacity vs 1,650kg. That 350kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

11.4m to 11.6m

Kia Sportage S FWD Petrol
11.4mTighter
Best
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque Dynamic SE P250
11.6m
Worst
Kia Sportage S FWD Petrol
11.4m · Average

Based on 11.4m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque Dynamic SE P250
11.6m · Average

Based on 11.6m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $2,309/year for the Kia Sportage and $2,366/year for the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque. That is a $57 annual difference in favour of the Kia Sportage.

Estimated annual total: $2,309 (Kia Sportage) vs $2,366 (Land Rover Range Rover Evoque). The Kia Sportage saves you roughly $57 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 7 years / 999,999km (Kia Sportage) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Land Rover Range Rover Evoque). The Kia Sportage has longer coverage.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Kia Sportage if: You need more boot space, want lower running costs, value a longer warranty, or prefer Kia's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque if: You prioritise performance, need stronger towing, or prefer Land Rover's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

This is genuinely close. The Kia Sportage and Land Rover Range Rover Evoque trade blows across the spec sheet, and neither runs away with an outright win. The Kia Sportage will save you roughly $57 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Kia Sportage has a clear edge. The Kia Sportage adds peace of mind with a longer 7-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Kia Sportage and Land Rover Range Rover Evoque?

The Kia Sportage is the cheapest at $38,490 before on-road costs.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Kia Sportage uses the least fuel at 8.1L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched — Kia Sportage all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which has the most boot space?

The Kia Sportage has the largest boot at 543L.

Which can tow the most?

The Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has the highest braked towing capacity at 2,000kg.

Which has the best warranty?

The Kia Sportage has the longest warranty at 7 years / Unlimited.

Which is the most powerful?

The Land Rover Range Rover Evoque makes the most power at 184kW. The Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is quickest to 100km/h in 7.6s.

Free: Chinese Cars in Australia Cheat Sheet

Sign up free and we'll email you our Chinese Cars Cheat Sheet (PDF) — all 22 brands ranked on service, parts, warranty and dealer experience. Plus new-car launches, reviews and founding-member pricing on the upcoming CarSorted Pro Report. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.

By subscribing, you agree to receive marketing emails. You can unsubscribe at any time. View our Privacy Policy.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs · Best mid-size SUVs