CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsLexus NX vs GWM Tank 500
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Lexus NX vs GWM Tank 500

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecLexusGWM
Price (RRP)$59,900$59,990
Power152kW255kW
0-100 km/h9s8.5s
Fuel Economy6.9 L/100km8.5 L/100km
Boot Space520L98L
Towing1,650kg3,000kg
Warranty4yr / 100k km7yr / 999.999k km
ANCAP Safety5 Stars5 Stars

Price Breakdown

The Lexus NX starts from $59,900 before on-road costs, while the GWM Tank 500 opens at $59,990. That makes the Lexus NX the more affordable entry point by $90.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $65,890 and $65,989 respectively.

Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Lexus NX by roughly $2,280 in fuel alone.

Safety Rundown

Both the Lexus NX and GWM Tank 500 hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating. Adult occupant protection scored 91% for the Lexus NX and 85% for the GWM Tank 500.

Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. The Lexus NX packs more ADAS features with 6 out of 10 key systems fitted, compared to 5 in the GWM Tank 500.

Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, lane keep assist, adaptive cruise control, a reversing camera.

Feature Showdown

The Lexus NX features a 9.8-inch touchscreen paired with a 8-inch digital dash, while the GWM Tank 500 gets a 14.6-inch display and 12.3-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The Lexus NX stands out with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto, wireless charging, power tailgate and ambient lighting that you will not find on the GWM Tank 500. The GWM Tank 500 counters with Apple CarPlay. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Drivetrain

The Lexus NX uses a Petrol producing 152kW and 243Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a AWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 9 seconds.

The GWM Tank 500 responds with a Hybrid making 255kW and 648Nm, paired to a 9-speed auto driving the rear wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 8.5 seconds.

The GWM Tank 500 has the clear power advantage at 255kW vs 152kW. In the real-world sprint, the GWM Tank 500 is 0.5s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Lexus NX measures 4,660mm long on a 2,690mm wheelbase, 418mm shorter than the GWM Tank 500 at 5,078mm (2,850mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the GWM Tank 500 generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 520L in the Lexus NX and 98L in the GWM Tank 500, giving the Lexus NX a 422L advantage. The GWM Tank 500 seats 7 vs 5.

For towing, the GWM Tank 500 leads with a 3,000kg braked capacity vs 1,650kg. That 1,350kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

11.2m to 11.4m

GWM Tank 500 Lux
11.2mTighter
Best
Lexus NX NX250 Luxury
11.4m
Worst
Lexus NX
11.4m · Average

Based on 11.4m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
GWM Tank 500
11.2m · Average

Based on 11.2m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $1,967/year for the Lexus NX and $2,423/year for the GWM Tank 500. That is a $456 annual difference in favour of the Lexus NX.

Estimated annual total: $1,967 (Lexus NX) vs $2,423 (GWM Tank 500). The Lexus NX saves you roughly $456 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 4 years / 100,000km (Lexus NX) vs 7 years / 999,999km (GWM Tank 500). The GWM Tank 500 has longer coverage. Capped-price servicing: 4yr (Lexus NX)—.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Lexus NX if: You want the lower entry price, need more boot space, want lower running costs, or prefer Lexus's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the GWM Tank 500 if: You prioritise performance, value a longer warranty, need stronger towing, or prefer GWM's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The GWM Tank 500 takes 4 of 7 key spec categories. The Lexus NX will save you roughly $456 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Lexus NX has a clear edge. The GWM Tank 500 adds peace of mind with a longer 7-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Lexus NX and GWM Tank 500?

The Lexus NX is the cheapest at $59,900 before on-road costs. That undercuts the GWM Tank 500 by $90.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Lexus NX uses the least fuel at 6.9L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched — Lexus NX and GWM Tank 500 all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which has the most boot space?

The Lexus NX has the largest boot at 520L.

Which can tow the most?

The GWM Tank 500 has the highest braked towing capacity at 3,000kg.

Which has the best warranty?

The GWM Tank 500 has the longest warranty at 7 years / 1000k km.

Which is the most powerful?

The GWM Tank 500 makes the most power at 255kW. The GWM Tank 500 is quickest to 100km/h in 8.5s.

Get ahead of your next car

Join free for new-car launches, news, reviews and buying guides. The independent take on what's new in Australia and what's actually worth buying, no dealer spin. Plus early access and founding-member pricing on the upcoming CarSorted Pro Report. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.

By subscribing, you agree to receive marketing emails. You can unsubscribe at any time. View our Privacy Policy.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs