CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsLotus Emeya vs Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Lotus Emeya vs Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance

Two electric Sedans go head to head. Which EV is the better buy for Australian drivers in 2026?

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecLotusMercedes-Benz
Price (RRP)TBC$189,900
Range (WLTP)610km
Battery102 kWh6.1 kWh
Power450kW500kW
0-100 km/h4.2s3.4s
Max DC Charge350kW
10-80% Charge Time14 min
Fuel Economy6.9 kWh/100km
Boot Space509L359L
Warranty5yr / 999.999k km5yr / 999.999k km
ANCAP SafetyNo data5 Stars
V2LYesNo

Price Breakdown

Pricing for one or both models is yet to be confirmed for the Australian market. We will update this comparison when official RRPs are announced.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Feature Showdown

Both come with modern infotainment systems. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The Lotus Emeya stands out with Apple CarPlay, V2L and KEF audio that you will not find on the Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance. The Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance counters with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto, heated front seats, ventilated seats and Burmester audio. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Drivetrain

The Lotus Emeya uses a Electric Motor producing 450kW and 710Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a AWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 4.2 seconds.

The Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance responds with a Hybrid making 500kW and 1020Nm, paired to a 9-speed auto driving all four wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 3.4 seconds.

The Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance has the clear power advantage at 500kW vs 450kW. In the real-world sprint, the Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance is 0.8s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Battery: 102kWh (Lotus Emeya) vs 6.1kWh (Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance).

Space & Comfort

The Lotus Emeya measures 5,139mm long on a 3,069mm wheelbase, 297mm longer than the Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance at 4,842mm (2,865mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Lotus Emeya generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 509L in the Lotus Emeya and 359L in the Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance, giving the Lotus Emeya a 150L advantage.

True Cost to Own

Running cost data is not yet available for both models. We will update when figures are confirmed.

Warranty: 5 years / 999,999km (Lotus Emeya) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance). Both match on warranty length.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Lotus Emeya if: You need more boot space, or prefer Lotus's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance if: You prioritise performance, or prefer Mercedes-Benz's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Lotus Emeya takes 3 of 5 key spec categories. If boot space matters, the Lotus Emeya has a clear edge. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Lotus Emeya and Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance?

The Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance is the cheapest at $189,900 before on-road costs.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance uses the least fuel at 6.9L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched — Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which has the most boot space?

The Lotus Emeya has the largest boot at 509L.

Which is the most powerful?

The Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance makes the most power at 500kW. The Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance is quickest to 100km/h in 3.4s.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All Sedans