CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsMercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance vs Polestar 5
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance vs Polestar 5

Two electric Sedans go head to head. Which EV is the better buy for Australian drivers in 2026?

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecMercedes-BenzPolestar
Price (RRP)$189,900$193,100
Fuel typePlug-in HybridElectric
Range (WLTP)670km
Battery6.1 kWh112 kWh
Electric range15km
Power500kW650kW
0-100 km/h3.4s3.2s
Max DC Charge350kW
10-80% Charge Time14 min
Fuel Economy6.1 kWh/100km
Boot Space280L365L
Towing1,800kg
Warranty5yr / Unlimited5yr / Unlimited
ANCAP SafetyNo dataNo data
V2LNoYes

Plug-in hybrid fuel economy is shown as a hybrid (battery depleted) so it compares fairly with the other car. A PHEV's official "combined" figure assumes you start every trip fully charged, so real-world economy depends on how often you plug in. Electric range shows how far it goes before the petrol engine is needed.

Track the Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance & Polestar 5

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

The Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance starts from $189,900 before on-road costs, while the Polestar 5 opens at $193,100. That makes the Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance the more affordable entry point by $3,200.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $208,890 and $212,410 respectively.

Both models qualify for Fringe Benefit Tax (FBT) exemption, which is a significant advantage for salary-sacrificed novated leases. Depending on your tax bracket, this can save $5,000-$15,000+ per year compared to an equivalent ICE vehicle.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Charging Times

How long each takes to charge — from a household power point to ultra-rapid DC — estimated from battery size and max charge rates.

How long to charge

6.1kWh usable

Estimates from usable battery size and the car's max charge rates (7.4kW AC). Real times vary with temperature, starting charge, charger output and the charging curve.

How long to charge

103kWh usable

Public DC

50kW charger · 0–80%

1h 39m

Ultra-rapid DC

up to 350kW · 0–80%

18 min

Estimates from usable battery size and the car's max charge rates (22kW AC, 350kW DC). Real times vary with temperature, starting charge, charger output and the charging curve.

Feature Showdown

The Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance features a 11.9-inch touchscreen paired with a 12.3-inch digital dash, while the Polestar 5 gets a 14.5-inch display and 9-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance stands out with panoramic roof, ventilated seats and Burmester audio that you will not find on the Polestar 5. The Polestar 5 counters with V2L and Bowers & Wilkins audio. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Interior trim differs: the Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance gets nappa leather upholstery while the Polestar 5 offers synthetic leather. Climate control is 2-zone in the Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance and 4-zone in the Polestar 5.

Drivetrain

The Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance uses a Hybrid producing 500kW and 1020Nm of torque, sent through a 9-speed auto to a AWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 3.4 seconds.

The Polestar 5 responds with a Electric Motor making 650kW and 1015Nm, paired to a automatic driving all four wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 3.2 seconds.

The Polestar 5 has the clear power advantage at 650kW vs 500kW. In the real-world sprint, the Polestar 5 is 0.2s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Battery: 6.1kWh (Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance) vs 112kWh (Polestar 5).

Space & Comfort

The Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance measures 4,842mm long on a 2,865mm wheelbase, 245mm shorter than the Polestar 5 at 5,087mm (3,054mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Polestar 5 generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 280L in the Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance and 365L in the Polestar 5, giving the Polestar 5 a 85L advantage.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

12.1m to 12.3m

TightestMercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance SedanTightest turn at 12.1m, easiest U-turns and carparks
Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance Sedan
12.1mTighter
Best
Polestar 5 Performance
12.3m
Worst
Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance Sedan
12.1m · Large

Based on 12.1m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Polestar 5 Performance
12.3m · Large

Based on 12.3m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Compare U-turns side by side

Turning Circle · U-turn compare

kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars
Tap to add/remove
TightestMercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E PerformanceTightest turn at 12.1m, needs the least road to swing around
Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E PerformanceTightest12.1 m
Large△ 3-point
Polestar 512.3 m
Large△ 3-point
Scrub the turn

0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep

Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.

True Cost to Own

Running cost data is not yet available for both models. We will update when figures are confirmed.

Warranty: 5 years / 999,999km (Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Polestar 5). Both match on warranty length.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance if: You want the lower entry price, or prefer Mercedes-Benz's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Polestar 5 if: You prioritise performance, need more boot space, or prefer Polestar's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Polestar 5 takes 5 of 6 key spec categories. If boot space matters, the Polestar 5 has a clear edge. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance and Polestar 5?

The Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance is the cheapest at $189,900 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Polestar 5 by $3,200.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance uses the least fuel at 6.1L/100km on the combined cycle.

What are the ANCAP safety ratings?

None of Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance and Polestar 5 carry a published ANCAP rating yet — check back as they are tested.

Which has the most boot space?

The Polestar 5 has the largest boot at 365L.

Which can tow the most?

The Polestar 5 has the highest braked towing capacity at 1,800kg.

Which is the most powerful?

The Polestar 5 makes the most power at 650kW. The Polestar 5 is quickest to 100km/h in 3.2s.

Track the cars you're comparing

Sign up free for price-drop alerts on the models in this comparison, plus our weekly new-car rundown covering launches, deals and reviews. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.

By subscribing, you agree to receive marketing emails. You can unsubscribe at any time. View our Privacy Policy.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All Sedans · Best electric cars