Audi e-tron GT vs Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance
Two electric Sedans go head to head. Which EV is the better buy for Australian drivers in 2026?
Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.
Audi e-tron GT
From $209,900
Sedan
Electric
435kW
—
5★ ANCAP
405L
Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance
From $189,900
Sedan
Hybrid
500kW
6.9 kWh/100km
5★ ANCAP
359L
Price Breakdown
The Audi e-tron GT starts from $209,900 before on-road costs, while the Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance opens at $189,900. That makes the Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance the more affordable entry point by $20,000.
Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $230,890 and $208,890 respectively.
Both models qualify for Fringe Benefit Tax (FBT) exemption, which is a significant advantage for salary-sacrificed novated leases. Depending on your tax bracket, this can save $5,000-$15,000+ per year compared to an equivalent ICE vehicle.
Safety Rundown
Both the Audi e-tron GT and Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating.
Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. The Audi e-tron GT packs more ADAS features with 8 out of 10 key systems fitted, compared to 6 in the Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance.
Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, lane keep assist, adaptive cruise control, a reversing camera. The Audi e-tron GT adds a 360-degree camera that the Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance misses.
Feature Showdown
The Audi e-tron GT features a 10.1-inch touchscreen paired with a 12.3-inch digital dash, while the Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance gets a 11.9-inch display and 12.3-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.
The Audi e-tron GT stands out with Bang & Olufsen audio and ambient lighting that you will not find on the Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance. The Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance counters with panoramic roof and Burmester audio. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.
Interior trim differs: the Audi e-tron GT gets leather upholstery while the Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance offers nappa leather. Climate control is 3-zone in the Audi e-tron GT and 2-zone in the Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance.
Drivetrain
The Audi e-tron GT uses a Electric producing 435kW and 740Nm of torque, sent through a single speed to a AWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 3.4 seconds.
The Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance responds with a Hybrid making 500kW and 1020Nm, paired to a 9-speed auto driving all four wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 3.4 seconds.
The Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance has the clear power advantage at 500kW vs 435kW. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.
Battery: 105kWh (Audi e-tron GT) vs 6.1kWh (Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance).
Space & Comfort
The Audi e-tron GT measures 4,989mm long on a 2,900mm wheelbase, 147mm longer than the Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance at 4,842mm (2,865mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Audi e-tron GT generally means more rear legroom.
Boot space is 405L in the Audi e-tron GT and 359L in the Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance, giving the Audi e-tron GT a 46L advantage.
Turning Circle
Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.
11.6m diameter
Average
Based on 11.6m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Turning circle ratings
True Cost to Own
Running cost data is not yet available for both models. We will update when figures are confirmed.
Warranty: 5 years / 999,999km (Audi e-tron GT) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance). Both match on warranty length.
Who Should Buy Which?
Buy the Audi e-tron GT if: You need more boot space, or prefer Audi's approach to design and ownership experience.
Buy the Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance if: You want the lower entry price, prioritise performance, or prefer Mercedes-Benz's approach to design and ownership experience.
The Verdict
This is genuinely close. The Audi e-tron GT and Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance trade blows across the spec sheet, and neither runs away with an outright win. If boot space matters, the Audi e-tron GT has a clear edge. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.
Common questions
Which is cheapest, Audi e-tron GT and Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance?
The Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance is the cheapest at $189,900 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Audi e-tron GT by $20,000.
Which is the most fuel-efficient?
The Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance uses the least fuel at 6.9L/100km on the combined cycle.
Which is safest?
They are evenly matched — Audi e-tron GT and Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.
Which has the most boot space?
The Audi e-tron GT has the largest boot at 405L.
Which can tow the most?
The Audi e-tron GT has the highest braked towing capacity at 1,000kg.
Which is the most powerful?
The Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance makes the most power at 500kW.
Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.
Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026
Comments (0)
Sign in to join the conversation
No comments yet. Be the first!
