CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsMercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance vs Porsche Taycan
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance vs Porsche Taycan

Two electric Sedans go head to head. Which EV is the better buy for Australian drivers in 2026?

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecMercedes-BenzPorsche
Price (RRP)$189,900$181,200
Fuel typePlug-in HybridElectric
Range (WLTP)503km
Battery6.1 kWh89 kWh
Electric range15km
Power500kW300kW
0-100 km/h3.4s4.8s
Max DC Charge270kW
10-80% Charge Time17 min
Fuel Economy6.1 kWh/100km
Boot Space280L407L
Warranty5yr / Unlimited3yr / Unlimited
ANCAP SafetyNo dataNo data
V2LNoYes

Plug-in hybrid fuel economy is shown as a hybrid (battery depleted) so it compares fairly with the other car. A PHEV's official "combined" figure assumes you start every trip fully charged, so real-world economy depends on how often you plug in. Electric range shows how far it goes before the petrol engine is needed.

Track the Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance & Porsche Taycan

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

The Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance starts from $189,900 before on-road costs, while the Porsche Taycan opens at $181,200. That makes the Porsche Taycan the more affordable entry point by $8,700.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $208,890 and $199,320 respectively.

Both models qualify for Fringe Benefit Tax (FBT) exemption, which is a significant advantage for salary-sacrificed novated leases. Depending on your tax bracket, this can save $5,000-$15,000+ per year compared to an equivalent ICE vehicle.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Charging Times

How long each takes to charge — from a household power point to ultra-rapid DC — estimated from battery size and max charge rates.

How long to charge

6.1kWh usable

Estimates from usable battery size and the car's max charge rates (7.4kW AC). Real times vary with temperature, starting charge, charger output and the charging curve.

How long to charge

93.4kWh usable

Public DC

50kW charger · 0–80%

1h 30m

Ultra-rapid DC

up to 270kW · 0–80%

21 min

Estimates from usable battery size and the car's max charge rates (22kW AC, 270kW DC). Real times vary with temperature, starting charge, charger output and the charging curve.

Feature Showdown

The Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance features a 11.9-inch touchscreen paired with a 12.3-inch digital dash, while the Porsche Taycan gets a 10.9-inch display and 16.8-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance stands out with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto, panoramic roof, ventilated seats and Burmester audio that you will not find on the Porsche Taycan. The Porsche Taycan counters with Apple CarPlay, V2L and BOSE audio. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Interior trim differs: the Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance gets nappa leather upholstery while the Porsche Taycan offers leather.

Drivetrain

The Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance uses a Hybrid producing 500kW and 1020Nm of torque, sent through a 9-speed auto to a AWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 3.4 seconds.

The Porsche Taycan responds with a Electric making 300kW and 410Nm, paired to a 2-speed auto driving the rear wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 4.8 seconds.

The Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance has the clear power advantage at 500kW vs 300kW. In the real-world sprint, the Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance is 1.4s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Battery: 6.1kWh (Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance) vs 89kWh (Porsche Taycan).

Space & Comfort

The Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance measures 4,842mm long on a 2,865mm wheelbase, 121mm shorter than the Porsche Taycan at 4,963mm (2,900mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Porsche Taycan generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 280L in the Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance and 407L in the Porsche Taycan, giving the Porsche Taycan a 127L advantage. The Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance seats 5 vs 4.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

11.7m to 12.1m

TightestPorsche TaycanTightest turn at 11.7m, easiest U-turns and carparks
Porsche Taycan
11.7mTighter
Best
Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance Sedan
12.1m
Worst
Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance Sedan
12.1m · Large

Based on 12.1m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Porsche Taycan
11.7m · Average

Based on 11.7m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Compare U-turns side by side

Turning Circle · U-turn compare

kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars
Tap to add/remove
TightestPorsche TaycanTightest turn at 11.7m, needs the least road to swing around
Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance12.1 m
Large△ 3-point
Porsche TaycanTightest11.7 m
Average△ 3-point
Scrub the turn

0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep

Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.

True Cost to Own

Running cost data is not yet available for both models. We will update when figures are confirmed.

Warranty: 5 years / 999,999km (Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance) vs 3 years / 999,999km (Porsche Taycan). The Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance has longer coverage.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance if: You prioritise performance, value a longer warranty, or prefer Mercedes-Benz's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Porsche Taycan if: You want the lower entry price, need more boot space, or prefer Porsche's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Porsche Taycan takes 4 of 7 key spec categories and comes in at a lower price. If boot space matters, the Porsche Taycan has a clear edge. The Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance adds peace of mind with a longer 5-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance and Porsche Taycan?

The Porsche Taycan is the cheapest at $181,200 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance by $8,700.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance uses the least fuel at 6.1L/100km on the combined cycle.

What are the ANCAP safety ratings?

None of Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance and Porsche Taycan carry a published ANCAP rating yet — check back as they are tested.

Which has the most boot space?

The Porsche Taycan has the largest boot at 407L.

Which has the best warranty?

The Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance has the longest warranty at 5 years / Unlimited.

Which is the most powerful?

The Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance makes the most power at 500kW. The Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance is quickest to 100km/h in 3.4s.

Track the cars you're comparing

Sign up free for price-drop alerts on the models in this comparison, plus our weekly new-car rundown covering launches, deals and reviews. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.

By subscribing, you agree to receive marketing emails. You can unsubscribe at any time. View our Privacy Policy.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All Sedans · Best electric cars